FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3015914828> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3015914828 endingPage "1182" @default.
• W3015914828 startingPage "1167" @default.
• W3015914828 abstract "The sum of forecasts of disaggregated time series is often required to equal the forecast of the aggregate, giving a set of coherent forecasts. The least squares solution for finding coherent forecasts uses a reconciliation approach known as MinT, proposed by Wickramasuriya, Athanasopoulos, and Hyndman (2019). The MinT approach and its variants do not guarantee that the coherent forecasts are non-negative, even when all of the original forecasts are non-negative in nature. This has become a serious issue in applications that are inherently non-negative such as with sales data or tourism numbers. While overcoming this difficulty, we reconsider the least squares minimization problem with non-negativity constraints to ensure that the coherent forecasts are strictly non-negative. The constrained quadratic programming problem is solved using three algorithms. They are the block principal pivoting (BPV) algorithm, projected conjugate gradient (PCG) algorithm, and scaled gradient projection algorithm. A Monte Carlo simulation is performed to evaluate the computational performances of these algorithms as the number of time series increases. The results demonstrate that the BPV algorithm clearly outperforms the rest, and PCG is the second best. The superior performance of the BPV algorithm can be partially attributed to the alternative representation of the weight matrix in the MinT approach. An empirical investigation is carried out to assess the impact of imposing non-negativity constraints on forecast reconciliation over the unconstrained method. It is observed that slight gains in forecast accuracy have occurred at the most disaggregated level. At the aggregated level, slight losses are also observed. Although the gains or losses are negligible, the procedure plays an important role in decision and policy implementation processes." @default.
• W3015914828 created "2020-04-17" @default.
• W3015914828 creator A5007778033 @default.
• W3015914828 creator A5043676060 @default.
• W3015914828 creator A5081147777 @default.
• W3015914828 date "2020-04-08" @default.
• W3015914828 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3015914828 title "Optimal non-negative forecast reconciliation" @default.
• W3015914828 cites W1974687599 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2000218110 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2014165366 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2015131139 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2017288758 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2035177710 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2048584787 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2072794528 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2073210389 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2076605490 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2093492509 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2096571934 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2105119576 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2109449402 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2116512828 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2497264409 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2790781641 @default.
• W3015914828 cites W2911254004 @default.
• W3015914828 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-020-09930-0" @default.
• W3015914828 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3015914828 type Work @default.
• W3015914828 sameAs 3015914828 @default.
• W3015914828 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W3015914828 countsByYear W30159148282020 @default.
• W3015914828 countsByYear W30159148282021 @default.
• W3015914828 countsByYear W30159148282022 @default.
• W3015914828 countsByYear W30159148282023 @default.
• W3015914828 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3015914828 hasAuthorship W3015914828A5007778033 @default.
• W3015914828 hasAuthorship W3015914828A5043676060 @default.
• W3015914828 hasAuthorship W3015914828A5081147777 @default.
• W3015914828 hasBestOaLocation W30159148282 @default.
• W3015914828 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W3015914828 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3015914828 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3015914828 hasConceptScore W3015914828C149782125 @default.
• W3015914828 hasConceptScore W3015914828C33923547 @default.
• W3015914828 hasConceptScore W3015914828C41008148 @default.
• W3015914828 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3015914828 hasLocation W30159148281 @default.
• W3015914828 hasLocation W30159148282 @default.
• W3015914828 hasLocation W30159148283 @default.
• W3015914828 hasOpenAccess W3015914828 @default.
• W3015914828 hasPrimaryLocation W30159148281 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W1974891317 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W2007596026 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W2044189972 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W2069964982 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W2313400459 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W2965437270 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W4225152035 @default.
• W3015914828 hasRelatedWork W4245490552 @default.
• W3015914828 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W3015914828 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3015914828 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3015914828 magId "3015914828" @default.
• W3015914828 workType "article" @default.