FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3016009118> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3016009118 endingPage "1281" @default.
• W3016009118 startingPage "1275" @default.
• W3016009118 abstract "Background Because of poor soft-tissue coverage at the proximal ulna and prominent posteriorly positioned implants, hardware removal remains the most common reason for revision surgery of olecranon fractures that were operatively treated using plate osteosynthesis. We hypothesized that low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis would reduce the number of soft tissue–related hardware removals compared with single posterior plating whereas the functional results would be comparable. Methods This study retrospectively included patients who were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis or a posterior 2.7-/3.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) for isolated olecranon fractures from 3 study centers. In addition to the implant removal rate, functional outcome measures (range of motion; Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score) were statistically compared. Results The study included 79 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 36 months (range, 24-77 months). Of these patients, 37 were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and 42, with a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP. The mean age was 57 years (range, 18-93 years). Range of motion after treatment with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP measured 129° (range, 80°-155°) and 139° (range, 100°-155°), respectively. The Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were 95 (range, 65-100) and 99 (range, 85-100), respectively (P = .028), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were 5.0 (range, 0-49) and 4.6 (range, 0-28), respectively (P = .673). Hardware was removed in 32% and 50% of patients after treatment with double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP, respectively (P = .11). Hardware removal owing to soft-tissue irritation was noted in 27% of patients after double-plate osteosynthesis and 38% after LCP treatment (P = .30). Discussion Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for treating olecranon fractures resulted in good clinical outcomes. However, the rate of hardware removal was not significantly reduced, and the functional results were comparable to those of common single–posterior plate osteosynthesis. Because of poor soft-tissue coverage at the proximal ulna and prominent posteriorly positioned implants, hardware removal remains the most common reason for revision surgery of olecranon fractures that were operatively treated using plate osteosynthesis. We hypothesized that low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis would reduce the number of soft tissue–related hardware removals compared with single posterior plating whereas the functional results would be comparable. This study retrospectively included patients who were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis or a posterior 2.7-/3.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) for isolated olecranon fractures from 3 study centers. In addition to the implant removal rate, functional outcome measures (range of motion; Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score) were statistically compared. The study included 79 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 36 months (range, 24-77 months). Of these patients, 37 were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and 42, with a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP. The mean age was 57 years (range, 18-93 years). Range of motion after treatment with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP measured 129° (range, 80°-155°) and 139° (range, 100°-155°), respectively. The Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were 95 (range, 65-100) and 99 (range, 85-100), respectively (P = .028), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were 5.0 (range, 0-49) and 4.6 (range, 0-28), respectively (P = .673). Hardware was removed in 32% and 50% of patients after treatment with double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP, respectively (P = .11). Hardware removal owing to soft-tissue irritation was noted in 27% of patients after double-plate osteosynthesis and 38% after LCP treatment (P = .30). Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for treating olecranon fractures resulted in good clinical outcomes. However, the rate of hardware removal was not significantly reduced, and the functional results were comparable to those of common single–posterior plate osteosynthesis." @default.
• W3016009118 created "2020-04-17" @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5027672108 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5030206060 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5046372474 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5061017928 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5066747407 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5069461324 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5077113127 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5077782960 @default.
• W3016009118 creator A5088987423 @default.
• W3016009118 date "2020-06-01" @default.
• W3016009118 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3016009118 title "Can low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures reduce implant removal? A retrospective multicenter study" @default.
• W3016009118 cites W1970056882 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W1978828877 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W1984903404 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2000490097 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2027187561 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2032267086 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2038207866 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2053916548 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2074734550 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2082326424 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2105753846 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2119621051 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2147577873 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2181276201 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2341747703 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2608447116 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2622699418 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2742659212 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2844903137 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2915339620 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W2982130527 @default.
• W3016009118 cites W4236035003 @default.
• W3016009118 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.091" @default.
• W3016009118 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32284307" @default.
• W3016009118 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3016009118 type Work @default.
• W3016009118 sameAs 3016009118 @default.
• W3016009118 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W3016009118 countsByYear W30160091182020 @default.
• W3016009118 countsByYear W30160091182021 @default.
• W3016009118 countsByYear W30160091182022 @default.
• W3016009118 countsByYear W30160091182023 @default.
• W3016009118 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5027672108 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5030206060 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5046372474 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5061017928 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5066747407 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5069461324 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5077113127 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5077782960 @default.
• W3016009118 hasAuthorship W3016009118A5088987423 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C2777304102 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C2780711802 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C136948725 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C141071460 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C167135981 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C2777304102 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C2780711802 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C2781184374 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C2781411149 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C60465272 @default.
• W3016009118 hasConceptScore W3016009118C71924100 @default.
• W3016009118 hasFunder F4320311356 @default.
• W3016009118 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3016009118 hasLocation W30160091181 @default.
• W3016009118 hasLocation W30160091182 @default.
• W3016009118 hasOpenAccess W3016009118 @default.
• W3016009118 hasPrimaryLocation W30160091181 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W185955521 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W1990206169 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W2106870338 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W2126747139 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W2238028513 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W236273979 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W2471654586 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W2528655216 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W3016009118 @default.
• W3016009118 hasRelatedWork W354829993 @default.
• W3016009118 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W3016009118 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3016009118 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3016009118 magId "3016009118" @default.
• W3016009118 workType "article" @default.