FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3016162954> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3016162954 endingPage "133" @default.
• W3016162954 startingPage "123" @default.
• W3016162954 abstract "<h3>Background</h3> Medical students and residents often evaluate training sites in vascular surgery with minimal exposure to those programs. We sought to identify factors associated with vascular surgery trainee satisfaction in relation to their current work environment and how they made their rank list. <h3>Methods</h3> All integrated residents and fellows currently in United States vascular training programs were queried using an anonymous electronic survey for variables of their current training environment, factors that influenced their rank order list, and satisfaction. Questions were graded on a Likert scale. Continuous, ordinal, and categorical variables were respectively analyzed using the two-sample <i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test/Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Fisher's exact test. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 166 of 517 (32%) trainees completed the survey with equal distribution across postgraduate years. Respondents reported high rates of satisfaction with their training program overall (84%), including 88% (<i>n</i> = 83) of residents and 78% (<i>n</i> = 56) of fellows. Several work environment variables were associated with both resident and fellow satisfaction including program-funded trips for conferences and presentations (<i>P</i> = 0.027 for residents; <i>P</i> = 0.001 for fellows), diversity of operative cases (<i>P</i> = 0.024; <i>P</i> < 0.001), perception of a strong supportive social network at the hospital (<i>P</i> = 0.006; <i>P</i> = 0.001), and perception of appreciation by attending surgeons (<i>P</i> < 0.001; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Fellows who felt appreciated by nursing staff (<i>P</i> = 0.047), ancillary staff (<i>P</i> = 0.013), and patients were more likely to be satisfied (<i>P</i> = 0.011); however, this was not true for integrated residents. Social outings with nontrainee family and friends were associated with satisfaction for fellows (<i>P</i> = 0.002) but not integrated residents (<i>P</i> = 0.138), whereas social outings with vascular trainees were associated with satisfaction for integrated residents (<i>P</i> = 0.047) but not fellows (<i>P</i> = 0.375). Similarly, satisfied integrated residents were more likely to have close relationships with their vascular cotrainees (<i>P</i> = 0.035) than fellows (<i>P</i> = 0.349). No rank list factors were found to be predictive of current trainee satisfaction for integrated residents. Rank list factors associated with fellow satisfaction included recommendation of the institution from a mentor (<i>P</i> < 0.001), success of program graduates (<i>P</i> = 0.002), faculty (<i>P</i> = 0.014), perceived program prestige (<i>P</i> = 0.040), and amount of early operative exposure (<i>P</i> = 0.042). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Vascular surgery trainees report a high level of satisfaction with their training program. Fellow satisfaction was more dependent on the perception of their workplace peers than integrated residents. Satisfied integrated residents were more likely to have close relationships with their vascular cotrainees than fellows." @default.
• W3016162954 created "2020-04-17" @default.
• W3016162954 creator A5032744186 @default.
• W3016162954 creator A5044406238 @default.
• W3016162954 creator A5082395439 @default.
• W3016162954 date "2020-08-01" @default.
• W3016162954 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3016162954 title "Are Vascular Surgery Trainees Satisfied and are They Using the Right Factors to Choose a Training Program?" @default.
• W3016162954 cites W1776737697 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W1947967250 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W1987220752 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W1990281511 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2071609379 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2102806183 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2111724273 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2130835641 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2155333222 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2418531435 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2567565970 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2620720350 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2803440831 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2803609331 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2893675592 @default.
• W3016162954 cites W2911976249 @default.
• W3016162954 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.029" @default.
• W3016162954 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32272145" @default.
• W3016162954 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3016162954 type Work @default.
• W3016162954 sameAs 3016162954 @default.
• W3016162954 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3016162954 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3016162954 hasAuthorship W3016162954A5032744186 @default.
• W3016162954 hasAuthorship W3016162954A5044406238 @default.
• W3016162954 hasAuthorship W3016162954A5082395439 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C191093355 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C206041023 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C2777010666 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C2778789114 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C5274069 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C105776082 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C105795698 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C126322002 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C12868164 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C138496976 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C141071460 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C151730666 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C15744967 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C191093355 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C206041023 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C2777010666 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C2777267654 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C2778789114 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C33923547 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C509550671 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C512399662 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C5274069 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C71924100 @default.
• W3016162954 hasConceptScore W3016162954C86803240 @default.
• W3016162954 hasLocation W30161629541 @default.
• W3016162954 hasLocation W30161629542 @default.
• W3016162954 hasOpenAccess W3016162954 @default.
• W3016162954 hasPrimaryLocation W30161629541 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W2095010742 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W2124147071 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W2314919571 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W2321437396 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W2410865645 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W2513100907 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W3162634036 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W3177851450 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W3210238706 @default.
• W3016162954 hasRelatedWork W4282930744 @default.
• W3016162954 hasVolume "67" @default.
• W3016162954 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3016162954 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3016162954 magId "3016162954" @default.
• W3016162954 workType "article" @default.