FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3017174862> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3017174862 endingPage "189" @default.
• W3017174862 startingPage "184" @default.
• W3017174862 abstract "Good analgesia has been shown to reduce the risk of pneumonia, chronic pain, and mortality in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). This survey explores the current analgesic practice in the UK, protocol use, barriers to provision, and physician preferences.A web-based survey was distributed nationally to an enriched cohort of clinicians working in UK trauma units with an interest in MRF management.Seventy-nine healthcare professionals responded. A third (31.4%) reported that their department had a rib fracture pain protocol, 52.9% did not, and 15.7% were unsure. Significantly more respondents reported adequate pain control when a hospital protocol was present compared to when not (χ2, p < 0.01). Inadequate analgesia, a poor cough, and inability to breathe deeply were the commonest complications reported by 81.4, 78.6, and 65.7%, respectively. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was the most commonly used form of analgesia (38.6%) followed by thoracic epidural (TEA) (30.0%) and continuous opioid infusion (18.6%). However, TEA was the preferred method of analgesia among respondents (37.1%) followed by serratus block (21.4%), paravertebral block (17.1%), and PCA (14.3%).There is considerable variation among physicians in their current use of analgesic modalities, with opiate-based methods predominating despite a physician preference for regional techniques. Thoracic epidurals are preferred by physicians but of limited use as a result of contraindications, time pressures, and staff skill mix. Pain control is reported to be better handled when protocols are present. Further research focusing on currently utilized regional techniques is required in order to produce a validated standardized national protocol that is informed by the current practice, the evidence base, and limitations to service provision.There is considerable variation among physicians in their current use of analgesic modalities. Opiate-based methods dominate for thoracic trauma despite a physician preference for regional techniques, which can be challenging in this cohort due to contraindications, staff skill mix, and time pressures. Inadequate analgesia is common but is better managed when pain management protocols are available.Beard L, Holt B, Snelson C, Parcha C, Smith FG, Veenith T. Analgesia of Patients with Multiple Rib Fractures in Critical Care: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in the UK. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(3):184-189." @default.
• W3017174862 created "2020-04-24" @default.
• W3017174862 creator A5002686430 @default.
• W3017174862 creator A5018202193 @default.
• W3017174862 creator A5019138306 @default.
• W3017174862 creator A5022122214 @default.
• W3017174862 creator A5030839086 @default.
• W3017174862 creator A5078765625 @default.
• W3017174862 date "2011-08-25" @default.
• W3017174862 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3017174862 title "Analgesia of Patients with Multiple Rib Fractures in Critical Care: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in the UK" @default.
• W3017174862 cites W1203519664 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W1983030468 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2009101536 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2022378767 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2049819706 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2050709806 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2053879607 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2072292439 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2081543449 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2098067880 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2131331364 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2179735573 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2305906555 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2416737106 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2509742726 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2509836083 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2512880410 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2516538464 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2571326272 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2613968971 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W2807180839 @default.
• W3017174862 cites W4214491140 @default.
• W3017174862 doi "https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23375" @default.
• W3017174862 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7225763" @default.
• W3017174862 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32435097" @default.
• W3017174862 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W3017174862 type Work @default.
• W3017174862 sameAs 3017174862 @default.
• W3017174862 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3017174862 countsByYear W30171748622022 @default.
• W3017174862 countsByYear W30171748622023 @default.
• W3017174862 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3017174862 hasAuthorship W3017174862A5002686430 @default.
• W3017174862 hasAuthorship W3017174862A5018202193 @default.
• W3017174862 hasAuthorship W3017174862A5019138306 @default.
• W3017174862 hasAuthorship W3017174862A5022122214 @default.
• W3017174862 hasAuthorship W3017174862A5030839086 @default.
• W3017174862 hasAuthorship W3017174862A5078765625 @default.
• W3017174862 hasBestOaLocation W30171748621 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C2779903281 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C144024400 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C160735492 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C162324750 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C194828623 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C2779903281 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C2780820201 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C36289849 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C42219234 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C50522688 @default.
• W3017174862 hasConceptScore W3017174862C71924100 @default.
• W3017174862 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3017174862 hasLocation W30171748621 @default.
• W3017174862 hasLocation W30171748622 @default.
• W3017174862 hasLocation W30171748623 @default.
• W3017174862 hasLocation W30171748624 @default.
• W3017174862 hasOpenAccess W3017174862 @default.
• W3017174862 hasPrimaryLocation W30171748621 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W1486790737 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2025193597 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2042489430 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2083479052 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2213819692 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2460986560 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2585911313 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2766832809 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W2799994636 @default.
• W3017174862 hasRelatedWork W4244159572 @default.
• W3017174862 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W3017174862 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3017174862 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3017174862 magId "3017174862" @default.
• W3017174862 workType "article" @default.