FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3017423463> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3017423463 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology & Simulation: Instrumentation & Technology I (MP04)1 Apr 2020MP04-17 SUPRAPUBIC-ASSISTED LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE-SITE SURGERY VERSUS OPEN URETEROVESICAL REIMPLANTATION USING INSERTION METHOD Guoxi Zhang*, Xiaofeng Zou, Liang Wang, and Rihai Xiao Guoxi Zhang*Guoxi Zhang* More articles by this author , Xiaofeng ZouXiaofeng Zou More articles by this author , Liang WangLiang Wang More articles by this author , and Rihai XiaoRihai Xiao More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000818.017AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (SA-LESS) and open ureterovesical reimplantation using insertion method, and to evaluate its clinical value. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent SA-LESS ureterovesical reimplantation and 32 patients who underwent open ureterovesical reimplantation using insertion method were selected from July 2010 to December 2016 in the Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College. To collect the material such as gender, age, preoperative water accumulation, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, postoperative day 1 visual analog simulation score (Visual Analogue Scale/Score, VAS), postoperative analgesia time, postoperative ventilation time, postoperative drainage withdrawal time, postoperative catheter indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay. The main clinical items were compared and analyzed. All patients were reexamined 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, and then every year. The follow-up included urinary color Doppler ultrasound, urinary analysis, renal function, intravenous urography and cystography, and patient scar assessment questionnaire. The differences of intraoperative and postoperative items between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: All 30 patients in the SA-LESS group were successful with no open surgery, no addtion port. 32 cases of the open group were successfully operated. No significant differences were found in operative time [(116.7±25.2)min vs (107.9±16.4)min, P=0.065], and postoperative catheter indwelling time [(8.0±1.8)d vs (8.9±2.1)d, P=0.088] between the two groups. Significant differences in intraoperative blood loss [(61.2±37.8)ml vs (110.8±39.1)ml, P=0.000], intraoperative incision length [(2.7±0.3)cm vs (12.8±2.4)cm, P=0.000], and postoperative intestinal function recovery time [(36.0±13.9)h vs (50.2±18.4)h, P=0.001] between the two groups were found. Significant differences in VAS score on the first postoperative day [(2.1±1.0) vs (3.8±1.2), P=0.001], VAS score on the third day after surgery [(1.0±1.0) vs (1.8±1.2), P=0.009], and postoperative analgesia time [(22.8±14.6)h vs (37.2±14.5)h, P=0.000] between the two groups were also found. There were significant differences in postoperative drainage tube indwelling time [(4.4±1.5)d vs (5.9±2.4)d, P=0.003],and postoperative hospital stay [(9.1±2.0)d vs (11.0±3.1)d, P=0.003] between the two groups. Complications occurred in 2 patients in the SA-LESS group, all of which were anastomotic leakage. In the open group, 9 patients had complications after operation. Among them, 4 patients had anastomotic leakage and 5 patients developed a wound infection. Significant difference was found in complication rates (x2=4.885, P=0.027). The total PSAQ of the SA-LESS group was lower than that of the open group at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year [(61.9±8.7) vs (85.9±8.3), P=0.000; (48.2±6.4) vs (74.0±8.2), P=0.000; (37.5±4.8) vs (64.9±6.3), P=0.000]. The SA-LESS group was followed up for 24-90 months, and the open group was followed up for 28-91 months. All cases were followed up for B-ultrasound and IVU, and postoperative hydronephrosis was improved to varying degrees. All cases were followed up for cystoscopy and no ureteral reflux was seen. CONCLUSIONS: SA-LESS ureterovesical reimplantation using insertion method, can result in small trauma, rapid postoperative recovery, less complications, and better cosmetic results with stable, long-term postoperative effect, which is worthy of application in clinic. Source of Funding: National Nature Science Foudation of China (Grant no. 81760462) © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e38-e39 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Guoxi Zhang* More articles by this author Xiaofeng Zou More articles by this author Liang Wang More articles by this author Rihai Xiao More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W3017423463 created "2020-05-01" @default.
• W3017423463 creator A5049512760 @default.
• W3017423463 creator A5059900841 @default.
• W3017423463 creator A5066337920 @default.
• W3017423463 creator A5080899913 @default.
• W3017423463 date "2020-04-01" @default.
• W3017423463 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3017423463 title "MP04-17 SUPRAPUBIC-ASSISTED LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE-SITE SURGERY VERSUS OPEN URETEROVESICAL REIMPLANTATION USING INSERTION METHOD" @default.
• W3017423463 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000818.017" @default.
• W3017423463 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3017423463 type Work @default.
• W3017423463 sameAs 3017423463 @default.
• W3017423463 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3017423463 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3017423463 hasAuthorship W3017423463A5049512760 @default.
• W3017423463 hasAuthorship W3017423463A5059900841 @default.
• W3017423463 hasAuthorship W3017423463A5066337920 @default.
• W3017423463 hasAuthorship W3017423463A5080899913 @default.
• W3017423463 hasBestOaLocation W30174234631 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConcept C2777907090 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConceptScore W3017423463C134018914 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConceptScore W3017423463C141071460 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConceptScore W3017423463C14184104 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConceptScore W3017423463C2776664737 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConceptScore W3017423463C2777907090 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConceptScore W3017423463C71924100 @default.
• W3017423463 hasConceptScore W3017423463C77411442 @default.
• W3017423463 hasIssue "Supplement 4" @default.
• W3017423463 hasLocation W30174234631 @default.
• W3017423463 hasOpenAccess W3017423463 @default.
• W3017423463 hasPrimaryLocation W30174234631 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W1530075032 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2022269959 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2119841606 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2131834835 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2402944716 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2418511342 @default.
• W3017423463 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3017423463 hasVolume "203" @default.
• W3017423463 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3017423463 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3017423463 magId "3017423463" @default.
• W3017423463 workType "article" @default.