Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3018282670> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W3018282670 endingPage "918" @default.
- W3018282670 startingPage "918" @default.
- W3018282670 abstract "<p class=abstract><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to compare the over underlay tympanoplasty technique with classical underlay tympanoplasty in terms of hearing impairment, graft acceptance and complications.</p><p class=abstract><strong>Methods:</strong> 60 patients of chronic otitis media, mucosal, inactive, aged between 16-60 years who presented to ENT OPD with small, medium, large and subtotal perforations having mild to moderate conductive hearing loss were included in the study. After taking informed consent, patients were randomly divided into 2 groups containing 30 patients each. In group A, graft was placed medial to the handle of malleus and medial to the annulus (underlay technique), while in group B, graft was placed lateral to the handle of malleus and medial to the annulus (over underlay technique). Both groups were reviewed after 6 months. Pre-operative and post-operative air bone gap were compared. Surgery was considered successful based on post-operative graft uptake, hearing improvement and maintenance of middle ear space. </p><p class=abstract><strong>Results:</strong> In group A, re-perforation was seen in 8 cases (26.7%) whereas only 3 cases (10%) in group B had re-perforation. Medialization was noted among 4 patients in group A (13.3%), and was absent in group B. Lateralization was absent in both the groups. Post-operative hearing threshold in group A was 6.2±4.56 dB and in group B was 11.45±7.38 dB.</p><p class=abstract><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Over underlay tympanoplasty is a safer technique as compared to classical underlay, showing lower rates of re-perforation or medialization and a significant improvement in hearing. Hence over-underlay is an effective method, having higher success rates.</p>" @default.
- W3018282670 created "2020-05-01" @default.
- W3018282670 creator A5012682525 @default.
- W3018282670 creator A5022416890 @default.
- W3018282670 creator A5044216516 @default.
- W3018282670 creator A5057154758 @default.
- W3018282670 creator A5081207906 @default.
- W3018282670 date "2020-04-21" @default.
- W3018282670 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W3018282670 title "Comparative study between over underlay with classical underlay techniques of tympanoplasty" @default.
- W3018282670 doi "https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20201687" @default.
- W3018282670 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3018282670 type Work @default.
- W3018282670 sameAs 3018282670 @default.
- W3018282670 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3018282670 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3018282670 hasAuthorship W3018282670A5012682525 @default.
- W3018282670 hasAuthorship W3018282670A5022416890 @default.
- W3018282670 hasAuthorship W3018282670A5044216516 @default.
- W3018282670 hasAuthorship W3018282670A5057154758 @default.
- W3018282670 hasAuthorship W3018282670A5081207906 @default.
- W3018282670 hasBestOaLocation W30182826701 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C13944312 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C2777679929 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C2779012872 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C2910531384 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C13944312 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C141071460 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C191897082 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C192562407 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C2777679929 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C2778456384 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C2778527123 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C2779012872 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C2910531384 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C41008148 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C548259974 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C71924100 @default.
- W3018282670 hasConceptScore W3018282670C76155785 @default.
- W3018282670 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W3018282670 hasLocation W30182826701 @default.
- W3018282670 hasOpenAccess W3018282670 @default.
- W3018282670 hasPrimaryLocation W30182826701 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W1964599956 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W2107313324 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W2163274728 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W2171885672 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W2376769477 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W2948836109 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W2993575345 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W3008277089 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W3031504196 @default.
- W3018282670 hasRelatedWork W3155030353 @default.
- W3018282670 hasVolume "6" @default.
- W3018282670 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3018282670 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3018282670 magId "3018282670" @default.
- W3018282670 workType "article" @default.