FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3018836047> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3018836047 endingPage "1" @default.
• W3018836047 startingPage "1" @default.
• W3018836047 abstract "Introduction The concepts of Education applied in the healthcare professional training undergo a strong influence from society and the evolution of technical knowledge. At the Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, the Bachelor’s Degree Courses in Medicine, Nursing, Speech Therapy and Technologists in Radiology and Biomedical Systems are organized according to the curriculum guidelines and the Education Ministry Resolutions. These do not present the terms ‘teaching”, “learn”, “learning” and “evaluation” in a homogenous manner. An instrument in the student-teacher partnership for the verification of vicissitudes, faults, analyzing the quantity and quality of what is understood and of what is understood by academics, the meaning of the impact of the terms teaching, learning and evaluation, presents relevant aspects in becoming a strong ally in the support of the path to knowledge. Objectives To qualitatively analyze the learning components in the acquisition of skills, attitudes and competencies by means of the interpretation of the necessities, difficulties and barriers in the learning of the Morphology Disciplines. Method The students in the disciplines of the Morphology Department in the Courses of Medicine, Nursing, Speech Therapy, Technologist in Radiology and in Biomedical Systems participated in the study. A Questionnaire was elaborated, presented and applied by means of an electronic form in two phases: initial and final thirds of the discipline. The students responded to the questions, referring to the degree of satisfaction: “fully”, “partially”, “rarely”, “never” and “do not know”, according to the Lickert Scale. The statistical analysis was performed using the software NVIVO, QSR International. The questions were: 1st Phase, “What do you feel lacking in the learning process?”; Which are the difficulties in learning?”; “What improvements would you suggest, we want to know: open your heart.”, and; 2nd Phase: “We learn together: describe your trajectory, successes, difficulties and suggestions.” Results In Table 1, these are the terms with the greatest incidence in the 1st Phase. In the 2nd phase, the terms most listed by the students are presented in Figure 1. Discussion and Conclusion The evaluation process in undergraduate education reflects the pedagogical choices made by professors, the circular guidelines and the teaching institution culture itself. In this manner, the institutional culture, quirks, tendencies, beliefs, obviousnesses and the defense, convenience and written-in-stone stances will support or not the necessities and vicissitudes of the student. In our perception, the academic feels more secure in having the professor “material”, imagining that therein lies the crux of what he or she should know to obtain a favorable result in terms of grades, often limiting the active striving for learning on the student’s part. The evaluations made throughout a course open the perspective of intervention by the teacher in the choice of new teaching tools, as well as by the student in his or her learning process. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint The terms most listed by the students in the 2nd phase. Table 1. Opinions gathered by course. Questions MEDICINE NURSING SPEECH THERAPY TECHNOLOGIST lacking for learning slides time for studying slides less content time for studying dificulties in learning slides time for studying slides menosconteúdo time for studying booklets suggest for improvement slides more practice more time slides less content “more time”" @default.
• W3018836047 created "2020-05-01" @default.
• W3018836047 creator A5006498807 @default.
• W3018836047 creator A5071271320 @default.
• W3018836047 creator A5077825999 @default.
• W3018836047 creator A5081872928 @default.
• W3018836047 creator A5084525786 @default.
• W3018836047 date "2020-04-01" @default.
• W3018836047 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3018836047 title "SEEKING EXCELLENCE IN THE TEACHING/LEARNING BINOMY. ACADEMIC NECESSITIES AND VICISSITUDES IN HUMAN MORPHOLOGY" @default.
• W3018836047 doi "https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.06841" @default.
• W3018836047 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3018836047 type Work @default.
• W3018836047 sameAs 3018836047 @default.
• W3018836047 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3018836047 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3018836047 hasAuthorship W3018836047A5006498807 @default.
• W3018836047 hasAuthorship W3018836047A5071271320 @default.
• W3018836047 hasAuthorship W3018836047A5077825999 @default.
• W3018836047 hasAuthorship W3018836047A5081872928 @default.
• W3018836047 hasAuthorship W3018836047A5084525786 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C2777352838 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C2777626052 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C71750763 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C15744967 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C160735492 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C17744445 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C19417346 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C199539241 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C2777352838 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C2777626052 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C2780876879 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C47177190 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C509550671 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C542102704 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C71750763 @default.
• W3018836047 hasConceptScore W3018836047C71924100 @default.
• W3018836047 hasIssue "S1" @default.
• W3018836047 hasLocation W30188360471 @default.
• W3018836047 hasOpenAccess W3018836047 @default.
• W3018836047 hasPrimaryLocation W30188360471 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2354892964 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2358733519 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2513985622 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2738599333 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2790769735 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2791911687 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W3030122002 @default.
• W3018836047 hasRelatedWork W3210789465 @default.
• W3018836047 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W3018836047 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3018836047 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3018836047 magId "3018836047" @default.
• W3018836047 workType "article" @default.