FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3019387678> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3019387678 endingPage "15" @default.
• W3019387678 startingPage "14" @default.
• W3019387678 abstract "ObjectiveDeep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum may be managed by full-thickness disc excision, with the goal of preserving rectal function and avoiding low anterior rectal resection syndrome (Supplemental Appendix 1). Transanal staplers may be successfully used to remove rectal wall discs and concomitantly to perform rectal suture. The goal of this video article is to identify 10 steps that may render the procedure standardized and reproducible.DesignStep-by-step video demonstration of the procedure.SettingA French tertiary referral center.InterventionsThe video presents disc excision of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum using a transanal circular stapler, following 10 steps: (1Nezhat C Nezhat F Pennington E Nezhat CH Ambroze W Laparoscopic disk excision and primary repair of the anterior rectal wall for the treatment of full-thickness bowel endometriosis.Surg Endosc. 1994; 8: 682-685Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar, 2Gordon SJ Maher PJ Woods R Use of the CEEA stapler to avoid ultra-low segmental resection of a full-thickness rectal endometriotic nodule.J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001; 8: 312-316Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar, 3Ng A Yang P Wong S Vancaillie T Krishnan S Medium to long-term gastrointestinal outcomes following disc resection of the rectum for treatment of endometriosis using a validated scoring questionnaire.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 56: 408-413Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar, 4Roman H Darwish B Bridoux V et al.Functional outcomes after disc excision in deep endometriosis of the rectum using transanal staplers: a series of 111 consecutive patients.Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: 977-986Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, 5Roman H Bubenheim M Huet E et al.Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial.Hum Reprod. 2018; 33: 47-57Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar) nodule dissection and rectum releasing; (2) rectal shaving; (3) removal of fat tissue on the lateral rectal wall; (4) placement of a suture on the shaved area; (5) introduction of the closed transanal circular stapler; (6) stapler opening at the nodule's level; (7) knot performing; (8) stapler closing and firing; (9) stitches reinforcing the stapled line; and (10) performing a bubbles test. From 2009 to 2020, the author has performed this procedure in 205 patients: the mean disc diameter was 40 ± 8 mm; microscopic foci were found on the disc edges in 25.7%; and the rectal recurrence rate was 1.5%, whereas the leakage rate was 4.4%. The local institutional review board stated that approval was not required because the video describes a technique and does not report a clinical case.ConclusionDisc excision using a transanal circular stapler following 10 steps is a standardized and reproducible procedure. The learning curve may be short because colorectal surgeons routinely employ the stapler to perform laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis." @default.
• W3019387678 created "2020-05-01" @default.
• W3019387678 creator A5077151564 @default.
• W3019387678 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W3019387678 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3019387678 title "Disc Excision using Transanal Circular Stapler for Deep Endometriosis of the Rectum in 10 Steps" @default.
• W3019387678 cites W1972599428 @default.
• W3019387678 cites W2329663919 @default.
• W3019387678 cites W2437047059 @default.
• W3019387678 cites W2580872069 @default.
• W3019387678 cites W2769306603 @default.
• W3019387678 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.017" @default.
• W3019387678 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32335183" @default.
• W3019387678 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3019387678 type Work @default.
• W3019387678 sameAs 3019387678 @default.
• W3019387678 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3019387678 countsByYear W30193876782021 @default.
• W3019387678 countsByYear W30193876782023 @default.
• W3019387678 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3019387678 hasAuthorship W3019387678A5077151564 @default.
• W3019387678 hasBestOaLocation W30193876781 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConcept C2779522080 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConcept C2781074409 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConceptScore W3019387678C141071460 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConceptScore W3019387678C2779522080 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConceptScore W3019387678C2781074409 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConceptScore W3019387678C29456083 @default.
• W3019387678 hasConceptScore W3019387678C71924100 @default.
• W3019387678 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3019387678 hasLocation W30193876781 @default.
• W3019387678 hasOpenAccess W3019387678 @default.
• W3019387678 hasPrimaryLocation W30193876781 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W1983547475 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2141170103 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2356476264 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2360993163 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2375032663 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2383760906 @default.
• W3019387678 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3019387678 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W3019387678 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3019387678 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3019387678 magId "3019387678" @default.
• W3019387678 workType "article" @default.