FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3020858566> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3020858566 endingPage "891" @default.
• W3020858566 startingPage "885" @default.
• W3020858566 abstract "Objective To investigate recent trends in mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse (POP)-related reconstruction procedures. Materials and Methods Using the 2001-2011 5% Medicare claims database, we identified POP diagnoses and related procedures. Transvaginal mesh use and sacrocolpopexy were first reported in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Results A total of 613,160 cases of vaginal and abdominal POP repair procedures were identified. The majority of procedures involved multiple compartments. The rate of mesh use increased dramatically from 2% of repairs in 2005 to 35% by 2008. After the Food and Drug Administration warning in 2008, mesh use plateaued and then decreased in 2011. Mesh was used more commonly in younger (odds ratio [OR] 0.722, P <.001), white (OR 0.712-0.791 for other races, P <.001) women in the South (OR 0.741-0.848 for non-South regions, P <.001). Starting in 2008, the rate of sacrocolpopexy procedures almost doubled yearly until 2011. Sacrocolpopexy was more common in younger patients (49% in women <70 years) and in white women (88%); the majority of sacrocolpopexies were performed in the South (60%) and laparoscopically (83%-98%). Conclusion The treatment of POP has changed over time. The use of mesh increased significantly until 2008, after which it plateaued following the Food and Drug Administration warning regarding mesh-related complications. Concurrently, the number of sacrocolpopexy procedures increased significantly starting in 2008 as the use of laparoscopic and/or robotic technique and concern regarding transvaginal mesh increased. To investigate recent trends in mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse (POP)-related reconstruction procedures. Using the 2001-2011 5% Medicare claims database, we identified POP diagnoses and related procedures. Transvaginal mesh use and sacrocolpopexy were first reported in 2005 and 2004, respectively. A total of 613,160 cases of vaginal and abdominal POP repair procedures were identified. The majority of procedures involved multiple compartments. The rate of mesh use increased dramatically from 2% of repairs in 2005 to 35% by 2008. After the Food and Drug Administration warning in 2008, mesh use plateaued and then decreased in 2011. Mesh was used more commonly in younger (odds ratio [OR] 0.722, P <.001), white (OR 0.712-0.791 for other races, P <.001) women in the South (OR 0.741-0.848 for non-South regions, P <.001). Starting in 2008, the rate of sacrocolpopexy procedures almost doubled yearly until 2011. Sacrocolpopexy was more common in younger patients (49% in women <70 years) and in white women (88%); the majority of sacrocolpopexies were performed in the South (60%) and laparoscopically (83%-98%). The treatment of POP has changed over time. The use of mesh increased significantly until 2008, after which it plateaued following the Food and Drug Administration warning regarding mesh-related complications. Concurrently, the number of sacrocolpopexy procedures increased significantly starting in 2008 as the use of laparoscopic and/or robotic technique and concern regarding transvaginal mesh increased." @default.
• W3020858566 created "2020-05-13" @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5004332532 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5013514468 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5019252348 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5024676913 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5035098566 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5044253698 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5059615238 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5074685464 @default.
• W3020858566 creator A5075317021 @default.
• W3020858566 date "2015-11-01" @default.
• W3020858566 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3020858566 title "Trends in Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair From the Medicare Database" @default.
• W3020858566 cites W1966623208 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2001932212 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2016378895 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2021318369 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2044621228 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2046877871 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2053776155 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2057696953 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2074664407 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2092649725 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2095730392 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2099673917 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2140579657 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2150221066 @default.
• W3020858566 cites W2161853504 @default.
• W3020858566 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.022" @default.
• W3020858566 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26344153" @default.
• W3020858566 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W3020858566 type Work @default.
• W3020858566 sameAs 3020858566 @default.
• W3020858566 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662016 @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662017 @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662018 @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662019 @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662020 @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662021 @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662022 @default.
• W3020858566 countsByYear W30208585662023 @default.
• W3020858566 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5004332532 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5013514468 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5019252348 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5024676913 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5035098566 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5044253698 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5059615238 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5074685464 @default.
• W3020858566 hasAuthorship W3020858566A5075317021 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C2779270285 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C3018890749 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C126322002 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C141071460 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C156957248 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C2779096551 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C2779270285 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C3018890749 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C71924100 @default.
• W3020858566 hasConceptScore W3020858566C99454951 @default.
• W3020858566 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3020858566 hasLocation W30208585661 @default.
• W3020858566 hasLocation W30208585662 @default.
• W3020858566 hasOpenAccess W3020858566 @default.
• W3020858566 hasPrimaryLocation W30208585661 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W1970652021 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W2032007372 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W2053955931 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W2418333763 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W3020858566 hasRelatedWork W1548483398 @default.
• W3020858566 hasVolume "86" @default.
• W3020858566 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3020858566 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3020858566 magId "3020858566" @default.
• W3020858566 workType "article" @default.