FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3021230299> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3021230299 abstract "Abstract Driven by the evidence of climate change many governments have decided to reduce carbon emissions associated with the production of electricity. Hence, there has been an increase in the use of renewable energy. Additional benefits include moving towards an energy supply which is more sustainable and more distributed. International targets for decarbonisation of the economy have been agreed at COP21 meetings in Paris in 2015. Of the renewable electricity technologies available, offshore wind allows electricity to be generated at scale and at a reasonable price (as can be seen from the second round of UK contract for difference see [1]). However, for many countries bottom fixed turbines are technically or commercial unfeasible due to water depth and seabed geology at suitable sites. This has been the inspiration for much research into floating wind turbines, see for example Musial et al [2]. Offshore Wind (OSW) is rapidly maturing sector and is increasingly seen as a major contributor to electricity supply in states with coastal demand centres and good wind resource. While there is a 28-year history and set of experiences that has been learned in the European theatre, the U.S. is only recently beginning to move forward with grid scale projects. The U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM) has, to date, leased fifteen Wind Energy Areas (WEAs) to developers along the eastern continental shelf of the U.S which to date have auctioned for a total of over $472 million [3]. Furthermore, in October of 2019 the Environmental Business Counsel of New England held a discussion of OSW in the Gulf of Maine which coincides with the new BOEM Gulf of Maine Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Task Force which has been chartered to facilitate coordination and consultation related to renewable energy planning activities in the Gulf of Maine. The first task force was held on December 12, 2019 and BOEM predicts that the new lease areas will be developed within the next ten years. States have also taken steps to support Offshore Wind development. As of 2020, 28 states and the District of Columbia states have mandatory Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) which require that a specific percentage of electricity utilities sell come from renewable resources [4] while 7 other states have adopted voluntary RPS programs. Several states have specific consideration for offshore wind by creating Offshore Renewable Energy Credits (ORECs). For example, the Maryland Offshore Wind Energy Act of 2013 established ORECs for sourcing 2.5% of the state's electricity supply from offshore wind [5]. Additionally, in 2019 New Jersey doubled its offshore wind commitment from 3,500 MW to 7,500 MW by 2035 [6]. Furthermore, other states have increased commitments to procure OSW such as Maine (5,000 MW by 2030), Massachusetts (3,200 MW by 2035), New York (9,000 MW by 2025), Connecticut (2,000 MW by 2030) and Virginia (2,500 MW by 2026) [7]. As of 2019, there are over 26 GW of OSW projects in the pipeline with a projection of over 35GW of OSW construction just on the East Coast by 2035 [8]. With dramatically decreasing Levelised Costs of Energy and large scale proposed build out, offshore wind is projected to play a major part in the US electricity grid and economy. The history of offshore wind power has included some notable hurdles and set-backs. Where these were due to fundamentals of design or analysis, large fleets of offshore assets were affected. Examples include failures of gearboxes, grounted connections and accelerated blade surface erosion. As floating wind is scaled up, to minimise similar exposure to technical risks, formal processes will help to identify the novel features, novel applications and components with the highest risk. Assumptions about suitability of existing onshore or offshore technical solutions must be challenged. Also care must be taken when using demonstration projects comprising single units as the basis for scaling up technologies. Currently, although monitored and scrutinised so as to be proven technically, these have comprised small-scale wind farms, under experimental conditions." @default.
• W3021230299 created "2020-05-13" @default.
• W3021230299 creator A5002624073 @default.
• W3021230299 date "2020-05-04" @default.
• W3021230299 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3021230299 title "Global Expansion of Offshore Wind Power Depends on Overcoming Significant Challenges Facing Floating Wind Turbines" @default.
• W3021230299 cites W1562045875 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2004216675 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2011670696 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2125194763 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2145897474 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2148987427 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2288792374 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2470099865 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2481353935 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2531008679 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2590525485 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2609240086 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W2795669220 @default.
• W3021230299 cites W3122071904 @default.
• W3021230299 doi "https://doi.org/10.4043/30524-ms" @default.
• W3021230299 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3021230299 type Work @default.
• W3021230299 sameAs 3021230299 @default.
• W3021230299 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3021230299 countsByYear W30212302992021 @default.
• W3021230299 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W3021230299 hasAuthorship W3021230299A5002624073 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C188573790 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C199104240 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C206658404 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C78600449 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConcept C8735168 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C119599485 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C127413603 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C134560507 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C144133560 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C162324750 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C175605778 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C188573790 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C199104240 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C206658404 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C39432304 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C78600449 @default.
• W3021230299 hasConceptScore W3021230299C8735168 @default.
• W3021230299 hasLocation W30212302991 @default.
• W3021230299 hasOpenAccess W3021230299 @default.
• W3021230299 hasPrimaryLocation W30212302991 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W16169764 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W18386131 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W22321746 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W26689757 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W30478045 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W32690664 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W3387149 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W41103483 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W46235460 @default.
• W3021230299 hasRelatedWork W49386969 @default.
• W3021230299 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3021230299 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3021230299 magId "3021230299" @default.
• W3021230299 workType "article" @default.