FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3021293329> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3021293329 endingPage "1464" @default.
• W3021293329 startingPage "1463" @default.
• W3021293329 abstract "We thank Dr Yoshimura and colleagues for their comments regarding our article [1Takayama H. Sekiguchi A. Chikada M. Noma M. Ishizawa A. Takamoto S. Mortality of pulmonary artery banding in the current era recent mortality of PA banding.Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74: 1219-1224Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar] and congratulate them on their excellent results. We showed that there was no improvement in terms of hospital mortality after pulmonary artery (PA) banding in the last decade and suggested that our results may justify the recent trend toward primary repair in accordance with accumulating evidence of better outcome with primary repair. We speculated that the palliative procedure may limit further improvement.It is very encouraging for congenital heart surgeons that Dr Yoshimura and co-workers showed reduction in mortality to essentially 0% after PA banding in the last decade. However, these results could lead us to perform PA banding on patients who potentially could undergo repair at an earlier age.The difference in mortality rates between the two studies, however, could be associated with different durations of observation, which was hospital mortality in our series, and different comorbid conditions. More importantly, we need to know long-term results comparing staged repair with primary repair to prove that PA banding is a “safe” procedure.As we wrote in our article, PA banding still has an important role, and it can be performed with reasonable mortality even in smaller patients. There is no doubt that there is a certain percentage of patients who cannot avoid this procedure. Enthusiastic research continues to seek a better outcome [2Leeuwenburgh B.P. Schoof P.H. Steendijk P. Baan J. Mooi W.J. Helbing W.A. Chronic and adjustable pulmonary artery banding.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 125: 231-237Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar, 3Corno A.F. Bonnet D. Sekarski N. Sidi D. Vouhe P. von Segesser L.K. Remote control of pulmonary blood flow initial clinical experience.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1775-1780Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar]. In other words, clinicians know that a breakthrough is necessary for better results. Individual studies comparing the different outcomes between primary repair and staged repair may be helpful in further delineating the role of PA banding. We thank Dr Yoshimura and colleagues for their comments regarding our article [1Takayama H. Sekiguchi A. Chikada M. Noma M. Ishizawa A. Takamoto S. Mortality of pulmonary artery banding in the current era recent mortality of PA banding.Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74: 1219-1224Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar] and congratulate them on their excellent results. We showed that there was no improvement in terms of hospital mortality after pulmonary artery (PA) banding in the last decade and suggested that our results may justify the recent trend toward primary repair in accordance with accumulating evidence of better outcome with primary repair. We speculated that the palliative procedure may limit further improvement. It is very encouraging for congenital heart surgeons that Dr Yoshimura and co-workers showed reduction in mortality to essentially 0% after PA banding in the last decade. However, these results could lead us to perform PA banding on patients who potentially could undergo repair at an earlier age. The difference in mortality rates between the two studies, however, could be associated with different durations of observation, which was hospital mortality in our series, and different comorbid conditions. More importantly, we need to know long-term results comparing staged repair with primary repair to prove that PA banding is a “safe” procedure. As we wrote in our article, PA banding still has an important role, and it can be performed with reasonable mortality even in smaller patients. There is no doubt that there is a certain percentage of patients who cannot avoid this procedure. Enthusiastic research continues to seek a better outcome [2Leeuwenburgh B.P. Schoof P.H. Steendijk P. Baan J. Mooi W.J. Helbing W.A. Chronic and adjustable pulmonary artery banding.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 125: 231-237Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar, 3Corno A.F. Bonnet D. Sekarski N. Sidi D. Vouhe P. von Segesser L.K. Remote control of pulmonary blood flow initial clinical experience.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1775-1780Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar]. In other words, clinicians know that a breakthrough is necessary for better results. Individual studies comparing the different outcomes between primary repair and staged repair may be helpful in further delineating the role of PA banding." @default.
• W3021293329 created "2020-05-13" @default.
• W3021293329 creator A5002395787 @default.
• W3021293329 creator A5030737416 @default.
• W3021293329 creator A5056945999 @default.
• W3021293329 creator A5079078412 @default.
• W3021293329 creator A5091614286 @default.
• W3021293329 date "2005-04-01" @default.
• W3021293329 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3021293329 title "Pulmonary Artery Banding Still Has an Important Role in the Treatmant of Congenital Heart Disease: Reply" @default.
• W3021293329 cites W2009246412 @default.
• W3021293329 cites W2046242549 @default.
• W3021293329 cites W2079245008 @default.
• W3021293329 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.053" @default.
• W3021293329 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W3021293329 type Work @default.
• W3021293329 sameAs 3021293329 @default.
• W3021293329 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3021293329 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3021293329 hasAuthorship W3021293329A5002395787 @default.
• W3021293329 hasAuthorship W3021293329A5030737416 @default.
• W3021293329 hasAuthorship W3021293329A5056945999 @default.
• W3021293329 hasAuthorship W3021293329A5079078412 @default.
• W3021293329 hasAuthorship W3021293329A5091614286 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConcept C179755657 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConcept C2776657402 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConcept C2780074459 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConcept C2780940725 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConceptScore W3021293329C141071460 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConceptScore W3021293329C164705383 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConceptScore W3021293329C179755657 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConceptScore W3021293329C2776657402 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConceptScore W3021293329C2780074459 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConceptScore W3021293329C2780940725 @default.
• W3021293329 hasConceptScore W3021293329C71924100 @default.
• W3021293329 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3021293329 hasLocation W30212933291 @default.
• W3021293329 hasOpenAccess W3021293329 @default.
• W3021293329 hasPrimaryLocation W30212933291 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W1996049721 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2026792198 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2032519429 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2083166340 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2163108837 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2167107972 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2303667617 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2345946035 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W2614294707 @default.
• W3021293329 hasRelatedWork W3023853455 @default.
• W3021293329 hasVolume "79" @default.
• W3021293329 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3021293329 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3021293329 magId "3021293329" @default.
• W3021293329 workType "article" @default.