Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3021672024> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W3021672024 endingPage "S253" @default.
- W3021672024 startingPage "S253" @default.
- W3021672024 abstract "BackgroundTo date, sparse data exists on the safety margins we should include for benign meningiomas treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT).Purpose/Objective(s)The purpose of this study was to investigate intra-observer and inter-observer variability in contouring benign meningiomas in order to select an appropriate margin.Materials/MethodsTwelve consecutive patients who had undergone FSRT for benign intracranial meningiomas were studied. Two radiation oncologists and one neuroradiologist independently contoured the target volume on two occasions, separated by at least a one week interval, on merged MRI and CT-scan. The stereotactic planning system used was Brainscan, version 5.31, BrainLAB AG. Absolute and relative variability in intra-observer volume measurements were calculated. Concerning inter-observer variability, we analyzed the mean absolute difference between volumes as well as the absolute positional shift in three dimensions.ResultsThe mean intra-observer variability was 5.2% (0.56cc) with a maximum of 12.97% (0.59cc). For inter-observer measurements, the mean maximal difference was 2.13cc with a maximum of 7.14cc. The average standard deviation (SD) for all volumes was ±0.84cc. The mean absolute positional shift was 1.03mm (±0.44mm SD) with a maximum of 2.79mm.ConclusionsOptimal radiotherapy planning relies on accurate delimitation of tumor volumes in order to spare critical structures and normal tissue. These results demonstrate that intra-observer variability does not seem to be significant. Inter-observer volume determination is more variable. However, the absolute positional shift is of small magnitude. We conclude that the application of a 2mm margin on the target volume seems safe in order to cover 95% (two SD) of the inter-observer variability. BackgroundTo date, sparse data exists on the safety margins we should include for benign meningiomas treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). To date, sparse data exists on the safety margins we should include for benign meningiomas treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Purpose/Objective(s)The purpose of this study was to investigate intra-observer and inter-observer variability in contouring benign meningiomas in order to select an appropriate margin. The purpose of this study was to investigate intra-observer and inter-observer variability in contouring benign meningiomas in order to select an appropriate margin. Materials/MethodsTwelve consecutive patients who had undergone FSRT for benign intracranial meningiomas were studied. Two radiation oncologists and one neuroradiologist independently contoured the target volume on two occasions, separated by at least a one week interval, on merged MRI and CT-scan. The stereotactic planning system used was Brainscan, version 5.31, BrainLAB AG. Absolute and relative variability in intra-observer volume measurements were calculated. Concerning inter-observer variability, we analyzed the mean absolute difference between volumes as well as the absolute positional shift in three dimensions. Twelve consecutive patients who had undergone FSRT for benign intracranial meningiomas were studied. Two radiation oncologists and one neuroradiologist independently contoured the target volume on two occasions, separated by at least a one week interval, on merged MRI and CT-scan. The stereotactic planning system used was Brainscan, version 5.31, BrainLAB AG. Absolute and relative variability in intra-observer volume measurements were calculated. Concerning inter-observer variability, we analyzed the mean absolute difference between volumes as well as the absolute positional shift in three dimensions. ResultsThe mean intra-observer variability was 5.2% (0.56cc) with a maximum of 12.97% (0.59cc). For inter-observer measurements, the mean maximal difference was 2.13cc with a maximum of 7.14cc. The average standard deviation (SD) for all volumes was ±0.84cc. The mean absolute positional shift was 1.03mm (±0.44mm SD) with a maximum of 2.79mm. The mean intra-observer variability was 5.2% (0.56cc) with a maximum of 12.97% (0.59cc). For inter-observer measurements, the mean maximal difference was 2.13cc with a maximum of 7.14cc. The average standard deviation (SD) for all volumes was ±0.84cc. The mean absolute positional shift was 1.03mm (±0.44mm SD) with a maximum of 2.79mm. ConclusionsOptimal radiotherapy planning relies on accurate delimitation of tumor volumes in order to spare critical structures and normal tissue. These results demonstrate that intra-observer variability does not seem to be significant. Inter-observer volume determination is more variable. However, the absolute positional shift is of small magnitude. We conclude that the application of a 2mm margin on the target volume seems safe in order to cover 95% (two SD) of the inter-observer variability. Optimal radiotherapy planning relies on accurate delimitation of tumor volumes in order to spare critical structures and normal tissue. These results demonstrate that intra-observer variability does not seem to be significant. Inter-observer volume determination is more variable. However, the absolute positional shift is of small magnitude. We conclude that the application of a 2mm margin on the target volume seems safe in order to cover 95% (two SD) of the inter-observer variability." @default.
- W3021672024 created "2020-05-13" @default.
- W3021672024 creator A5015309906 @default.
- W3021672024 creator A5024987561 @default.
- W3021672024 creator A5031159541 @default.
- W3021672024 creator A5033134999 @default.
- W3021672024 creator A5063841558 @default.
- W3021672024 creator A5073690902 @default.
- W3021672024 creator A5090365208 @default.
- W3021672024 date "2006-11-01" @default.
- W3021672024 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W3021672024 title "2079" @default.
- W3021672024 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.482" @default.
- W3021672024 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W3021672024 type Work @default.
- W3021672024 sameAs 3021672024 @default.
- W3021672024 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3021672024 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3021672024 hasAuthorship W3021672024A5015309906 @default.
- W3021672024 hasAuthorship W3021672024A5024987561 @default.
- W3021672024 hasAuthorship W3021672024A5031159541 @default.
- W3021672024 hasAuthorship W3021672024A5033134999 @default.
- W3021672024 hasAuthorship W3021672024A5063841558 @default.
- W3021672024 hasAuthorship W3021672024A5073690902 @default.
- W3021672024 hasAuthorship W3021672024A5090365208 @default.
- W3021672024 hasBestOaLocation W30216720241 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C105054674 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C120934525 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C199639397 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C2779104521 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C2780704645 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C2992393070 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C105054674 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C105795698 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C120934525 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C121332964 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C126322002 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C126838900 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C127413603 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C199639397 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C22679943 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C2779104521 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C2780387249 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C2780704645 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C2989005 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C2992393070 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C33923547 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C44249647 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C509974204 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C62520636 @default.
- W3021672024 hasConceptScore W3021672024C71924100 @default.
- W3021672024 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W3021672024 hasLocation W30216720241 @default.
- W3021672024 hasOpenAccess W3021672024 @default.
- W3021672024 hasPrimaryLocation W30216720241 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W1979381110 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W1993051078 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W2078275218 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W2085374921 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W2091197545 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W2095436210 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W2580869318 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W4240889116 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W4313169552 @default.
- W3021672024 hasRelatedWork W59540747 @default.
- W3021672024 hasVolume "66" @default.
- W3021672024 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3021672024 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3021672024 magId "3021672024" @default.
- W3021672024 workType "article" @default.