FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3022260092> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3022260092 endingPage "1302" @default.
• W3022260092 startingPage "1277" @default.
• W3022260092 abstract "Purpose The overall aim of this paper was to examine the impact of the Australian research assessment exercise on the research approaches (positivist/non-positivist) favoured by accounting disciplines in Australia. Our key research question examined how the outputs and foci of research in elite accounting disciplines changed over a 16-year period. Our analysis was informed by Bourdieu's notions of academic elitism and symbolic violence. Design/methodology/approach We analysed all papers published in 20 major accounting journals across a 16-year period by Australian accounting disciplines that were highly rated in the research assessment exercise. We also compared our results from this group against two case study accounting disciplines that were not rated as “world class”. Findings Our key finding is that the introduction of a research assessment exercise in Australia has resulted in research outputs of elite accounting disciplines over this period being increasingly focused on positivist rather than non-positivist research. Our findings evidence a narrowing of accounting disciplines' research agendas and foci across the period. Research limitations/implications Our findings highlight a considerable narrowing of the research agenda and paradigms in accounting disciplines that is not in the public interest. Our findings also have implications for the literature on academic elitism. The narrowing of the research agenda and greater foci on positivist research exhibited in our findings demonstrates the role of dominant elites in controlling the research agenda through a research assessment exercise. Practical implications A practical implication is that proper research, regardless of the approach used, must be appropriately recognised and accepted by Accounting Disciplines, not ostracised or discouraged. Research implications are the breadth of accounting research should be celebrated and concentration eschewed. Australian accounting discipline leaders should not fall for the illusion that the only good research is that which is published in a small number of North American positivist journals. Originality/value Our findings provide insights into Bourdieu's work through demonstrating how dominant players have successfully exploited an external regulatory mechanism, a research assessment exercise, to strengthen their position within a field and exert control over the research agendas of accounting disciplines. Previous work by Bourdieu has not directly examined how actors utilise these outside forces as instruments for shaping their own field." @default.
• W3022260092 created "2020-05-13" @default.
• W3022260092 creator A5009628749 @default.
• W3022260092 creator A5013121978 @default.
• W3022260092 creator A5044672079 @default.
• W3022260092 creator A5053528881 @default.
• W3022260092 date "2020-05-26" @default.
• W3022260092 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3022260092 title "Impact of research assessment exercises on research approaches and foci of accounting disciplines in Australia" @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1532042092 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1605698558 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1711789986 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1820103240 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1954840444 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1975504145 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1975853573 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1979468689 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1981307554 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1990367023 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1990375393 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1990513354 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1995344023 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W1997914096 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W200006900 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2002326789 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2002908692 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2040679808 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2053089201 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2061921273 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2073700701 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2081377020 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2086214802 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2086337745 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2090376779 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2105646367 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2139224124 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2147868529 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2170644172 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2478068331 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2498784299 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2531867139 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2612466137 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2796379753 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2888461389 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W2914261123 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W3005722924 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W3121185331 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W3122201942 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W3123143066 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W3124154616 @default.
• W3022260092 cites W782808780 @default.
• W3022260092 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-12-2019-4293" @default.
• W3022260092 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3022260092 type Work @default.
• W3022260092 sameAs 3022260092 @default.
• W3022260092 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W3022260092 countsByYear W30222600922020 @default.
• W3022260092 countsByYear W30222600922021 @default.
• W3022260092 countsByYear W30222600922022 @default.
• W3022260092 countsByYear W30222600922023 @default.
• W3022260092 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3022260092 hasAuthorship W3022260092A5009628749 @default.
• W3022260092 hasAuthorship W3022260092A5013121978 @default.
• W3022260092 hasAuthorship W3022260092A5044672079 @default.
• W3022260092 hasAuthorship W3022260092A5053528881 @default.
• W3022260092 hasBestOaLocation W30222600922 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C128706718 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C2775987171 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C2777861003 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C2780514539 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C2780688418 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C2780801425 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C2781291010 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C8795937 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C120912362 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C121332964 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C121955636 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C127413603 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C128706718 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C144024400 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C162324750 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C17744445 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C199360897 @default.
• W3022260092 hasConceptScore W3022260092C199539241 @default.

• next