Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3022330150> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3022330150 endingPage "518.e3" @default.
- W3022330150 startingPage "508" @default.
- W3022330150 abstract "Background and Aims The aim of this study was to compare a low-residual diet (LRD) with a clear-liquid diet (CLD) for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials comparing LRD with CLD for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The last search was performed on September 20, 2019. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation. The outcomes were compared using systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). Results Twenty randomized controlled trials published between 2005 and 2019 with 4323 participants were included. LRD was comparable with CLD for adequate bowel preparation (P = .79; odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.29). The detection rates for polyps (P = .68; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86-1.27) or adenomas (P = .78; OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.86-1.23) were similar between the groups. There were significantly fewer advents in individuals in the LRD group: nausea (P = .02; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94), vomiting (P = .04; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98), hunger (P < .001; OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.53), and headache (P = .02; OR ,0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93). In addition, significantly more individuals in the LRD group found it easy to complete the diet (P = .01; OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.15-3.00) and showed willingness to repeat it (P = .005; OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.28-3.89). TSA demonstrated that the cumulative Z curve crossed both the traditional boundary and the trial sequential monitoring boundary for adequate bowel preparation. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that LRD was comparable with CLD in the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy. More clinical trials are needed to confirm other outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare a low-residual diet (LRD) with a clear-liquid diet (CLD) for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials comparing LRD with CLD for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The last search was performed on September 20, 2019. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation. The outcomes were compared using systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). Twenty randomized controlled trials published between 2005 and 2019 with 4323 participants were included. LRD was comparable with CLD for adequate bowel preparation (P = .79; odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.29). The detection rates for polyps (P = .68; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86-1.27) or adenomas (P = .78; OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.86-1.23) were similar between the groups. There were significantly fewer advents in individuals in the LRD group: nausea (P = .02; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94), vomiting (P = .04; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98), hunger (P < .001; OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.53), and headache (P = .02; OR ,0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93). In addition, significantly more individuals in the LRD group found it easy to complete the diet (P = .01; OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.15-3.00) and showed willingness to repeat it (P = .005; OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.28-3.89). TSA demonstrated that the cumulative Z curve crossed both the traditional boundary and the trial sequential monitoring boundary for adequate bowel preparation. The present study demonstrated that LRD was comparable with CLD in the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy. More clinical trials are needed to confirm other outcomes." @default.
- W3022330150 created "2020-05-13" @default.
- W3022330150 creator A5001916762 @default.
- W3022330150 creator A5007245762 @default.
- W3022330150 creator A5045772195 @default.
- W3022330150 creator A5051756286 @default.
- W3022330150 creator A5053884126 @default.
- W3022330150 creator A5066815390 @default.
- W3022330150 creator A5074884748 @default.
- W3022330150 date "2020-09-01" @default.
- W3022330150 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W3022330150 title "Low-residual diet versus clear-liquid diet for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials" @default.
- W3022330150 cites W1838067016 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W1892226397 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W1944202795 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W1972105225 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W1976759383 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2043419158 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2045963071 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2047739279 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2067639596 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2072473652 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2086989596 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2095169416 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2131931518 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2170892587 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2321693498 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2339998814 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2476052136 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2754801025 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2766145563 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2767462882 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2809915560 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2810619033 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2884890093 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2889646458 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2895129793 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2908381522 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2914214656 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2921067099 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2955541446 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2958754876 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2971994193 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2975446965 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2976061559 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2979082983 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2979821979 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2982391556 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2982862200 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2983879469 @default.
- W3022330150 cites W2984270432 @default.
- W3022330150 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.069" @default.
- W3022330150 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32376331" @default.
- W3022330150 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3022330150 type Work @default.
- W3022330150 sameAs 3022330150 @default.
- W3022330150 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W3022330150 countsByYear W30223301502021 @default.
- W3022330150 countsByYear W30223301502022 @default.
- W3022330150 countsByYear W30223301502023 @default.
- W3022330150 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3022330150 hasAuthorship W3022330150A5001916762 @default.
- W3022330150 hasAuthorship W3022330150A5007245762 @default.
- W3022330150 hasAuthorship W3022330150A5045772195 @default.
- W3022330150 hasAuthorship W3022330150A5051756286 @default.
- W3022330150 hasAuthorship W3022330150A5053884126 @default.
- W3022330150 hasAuthorship W3022330150A5066815390 @default.
- W3022330150 hasAuthorship W3022330150A5074884748 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C2780580376 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C121608353 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C126322002 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C156957248 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C168563851 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C2778435480 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C2780580376 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C44249647 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C526805850 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C71924100 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C90924648 @default.
- W3022330150 hasConceptScore W3022330150C95190672 @default.
- W3022330150 hasFunder F4320321540 @default.
- W3022330150 hasFunder F4320322990 @default.
- W3022330150 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W3022330150 hasLocation W30223301501 @default.
- W3022330150 hasOpenAccess W3022330150 @default.
- W3022330150 hasPrimaryLocation W30223301501 @default.
- W3022330150 hasRelatedWork W2022808982 @default.
- W3022330150 hasRelatedWork W2047252483 @default.