Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3022384733> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3022384733 endingPage "2085" @default.
- W3022384733 startingPage "2075" @default.
- W3022384733 abstract "Past practices of intensive forest management have resulted in a massive decline in key ecological elements, such as dead and moribund trees (Thorn et al., accepted; Whitehouse, 2006). In addition, with the recent increase in wood-fuel prices, the pressure on deadwood and logging residues, even of small diameter, has increased (Lassauce, Lieutier, & Bouget, 2012). In Europe, at least 20%–30% of all forest-dwelling species are regarded as saproxylic, that is, dependent on deadwood (e.g. many species of beetles and fungi) or able to use it facultatively, for example as shelter or as a foraging substrate (e.g. epixylic spiders; Siitonen, 2001). Saproxylic organisms are important drivers of wood decomposition and nutrient cycling (Alexander, 2008; Ulyshen, 2016) but with large-scale declines in deadwood amount many species have become endangered or extinct (Seibold, Bässler, et al., 2015; Seibold, Brandl, et al., 2015). The local alpha-diversity of saproxylic organisms is determined by several environmental drivers operating at the scale of a single deadwood object (Seibold, Bässler, et al., 2015; Seibold, Brandl, et al., 2015) and mainly determined by object type (e.g. snag/log/branch, laying/standing), microclimate, tree species and decomposition stage (Gossner et al., 2016; Krah et al., 2018). In addition, communities of saproxylic organisms differ between deadwood of different diameters (Heilmann-Clausen & Christensen, 2004; Pouska et al., 2011). The microclimatic conditions of deadwood objects are mainly determined by canopy openness, which correlates with differences in humidity and temperature (Chen et al., 1999; Scharenbroch & Bockheim, 2007; Seibold, Bässler, Baldrian, et al., 2016; Seibold, Bässler, Brandl, et al., 2016). For instance, within communities of saproxylic beetles and spiders the highest species numbers are typically reached on sun-exposed deadwood (Müller et al., 2015; Thorn et al., 2016), whereas wood-inhabiting fungi prefer sites where the humidity is higher (Bässler, Müller, & Dziock, 2010). Finally, the local characteristics of deadwood typically differ among different forest stands, which together with species-specific dispersal abilities cause a spatial turnover of community composition of saproxylic organisms (Komonen & Müller, 2018; Schall et al., 2018). Under natural conditions, the occurrence of particular tree species often correlates with the degree of sun exposure impeding the unravelling of the decisive factors for the diversity of saproxylic organisms in observational field studies (Seibold, Bässler, et al., 2015; Seibold, Brandl, et al., 2015). Hence, a complete understanding of the environmental drivers of species beta-diversity, which together with alpha-diversity determines the total gamma-diversity, is lacking. Integrative conservation strategies incorporating deadwood enrichment have been implemented within the last 20 years (Vítková et al., 2018) and are mainly of two types. The first involves the passive enrichment of deadwood, by terminating production in a forest stand and designating it as a protected area or by protecting single habitat trees and tree groups (Lindenmayer & Laurance, 2017; Vítková et al., 2018). This results in the accumulation of deadwood by natural processes, such as disturbances or natural senescence. A passive enrichment encompasses both, sun-exposed and shaded deadwood (Sebek et al., 2016; Vodka, Konvicka, & Cizek, 2009). The second strategy consists of the active enrichment of deadwood during harvest operations, in which deadwood is mainly created by leaving tree parts, for example treetops, on site (Sandström et al., 2019). Active strategies aim at integrating economic and ecological demands (Bauhus, Puettmann, & Messier, 2009) and thus focus on deadwood amount rather than deadwood diversity. As a consequence, deadwood is mostly enriched under the shaded conditions of uneven-aged forests and the majority of deadwood derives from the dominant tree species, although tree species and the degree of sun exposure of enriched deadwood can be controlled during regular harvest operations (Doerfler, Müller, Gossner, Hofner, & Weisser, 2017). In this study, we tested the role of deadwood quality for biodiversity by examining the alpha-, beta- and gamma-diversity of saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi, two obligate saproxylic groups that directly depend on deadwood, as well as spiders that use deadwood facultatively, i.e. as a structural component and feeding ground. In an experimental approach, all three taxa were sampled on the logs and branches of six tree species subjected to three treatments related to sun exposure. We predicted (a) higher species numbers of saproxylic beetles and spiders but lower species numbers of wood-inhabiting fungi under sun-exposed conditions and (b) the greater importance of tree species for saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi compared to spiders, because of their direct dependence on deadwood. We then determined which combination of tree species and sun exposure promotes highest gamma-diversity. Our study was conducted in the Steigerwald forest, located in northern Bavaria, Germany (N 49°50′; E 10°29′). This area covers around ~16,500 ha of forested area by a mean annual temperature of 7–8°C and an annual precipitation of 750–850 mm (BayFORKLIM, 1996). Forest stands consist mainly of European beech Fagus sylvatica (44%), sessile oak Quercus petraea (20%) and Scots pine Pinus sylvestris (14%). Other broad-leaved tree species account for 10% and other coniferous trees, such as Norway spruce Picea abies for 12% of the forested area. Intensive management over a period of centuries depleted the forest of deadwood and moribund trees. However, active enrichment of deadwood has been practiced by the local forest administration since 2005 (Doerfler et al., 2017). In 2015, we established six study sites, each containing three subplots differing in their levels of sun exposure (Figure1): (a) sun exposed on a forest meadow, (b) canopy shaded within a closed forest stand and (c) artificially shaded by mesh nets on a forest meadow. The third treatment was implemented to obtain shaded conditions without any bias of covarying factors from the forest stand. Freshly cut logs of six different tree species were randomly exposed in early 2015 on each subplot, including two softwood broadleaf tree species: European hornbeam Carpinus betulus and European aspen Populus tremula; two hardwood broadleaf tree species: European beech F. sylvatica and sessile oak Q. petraea; and two coniferous tree species: silver fir Abies alba and Scots pine P. sylvestris (henceforth only the genus names are used for simplicity). All logs were felled in the study area and had a similar mean diameter of 32.9 (SD ± 5.6) cm and a similar mean length of 303 (SD ± 10.4) cm. To prevent possible influences of ground vegetation, all logs were placed on oak logs with a diameter of 25 cm. In addition, branch bundles of all tree species were exposed under the same treatments on each subplot from April 2016 to June 2016. The branches in the bundles had a mean length of 220.6 (SD ± 29.4) cm and a mean diameter of 2.2 (SD ± 0.5) cm. We focused on saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi, as both groups are important drivers of deadwood decay (Ulyshen, 2016), and spiders as facultative users of deadwood. Communities of saproxylic beetles and spiders were sampled using stem emergence traps. This type of trap is tightly covering a given log section of a log and enables to trap all arthropods which develop or overwinter in the respective log section. Traps were filled with saturated saline solution as sampling fluid and emptied monthly between April and September in 2016, 2017 and 2018. Between years, trap positions were shifted on the logs to avoid bias due to trap coverage. Branch bundles were reared from July 2016 to September 2017 in plastic tubes to which ethanol-filled trapping bottles had been attached (see Figure S1). Emerging beetles and spiders were determined by taxonomic specialists according to Freude, Harde, and Lohse (1963–1984) and Heimer and Nentwig (1991). Beetles were classified as saproxylic according to Schmidl and Bussler (2004). Basidiomes of wood-inhibiting fungi were assessed visually on the log surfaces in October 2016, 2017 and 2018. Species were identified either in the field or, for cryptic species, in the laboratory. Because of the low numbers of records of wood-inhabiting fungi and spiders in branch bundles, these taxa were analysed only from logs. All analyses were performed using r 3.3.2 (R Development Core Team, 2019). The effects of different treatments and tree species on alpha-diversity were tested by applying generalized linear mixed-effects models for each taxonomic group and for logs and branches separately (package lme4; Bates, Mächler, Bolker, & Walker, 2014). The effects of treatment and tree species on species numbers were tested independently within two models and the combined effects of treatment and tree species in a third model. The branch surface was added as an additional predictor to control for resource amount, while the resource amount was standardized for the logs by the respective trap area. Plot identity and year were added as random effects to all models. A linear inference procedure with the simultaneous adjustment of p-values was applied by means of the function ‘glht’ (package multcomp; Hothorn, Bretz, Westfall, & Heiberger, 2008) to compare species numbers between treatments, tree species and their combinations. Differences in community composition between treatments, tree species and combinations thereof were visualized by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (package vegan; Oksanen et al., 2013). The effects of tree species, treatment and space on the beta-diversity were measured as Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of communities by multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM; Lichstein, 2007) and regularized discriminant analysis (RDA; Friedman, 1989). Although MRM and Mantel tests are widely used in spatial analyses, they have less power to detect spatial autocorrelations in the response data (Legendre & Borcard, 2015). RDA offers an alternative method, as in the detection of spatial structure it has a higher power than the Mantel tests used for MRM (Legendre & Borcard, 2015). For the MRM, distance matrices were generated using the function ‘dist’ (package proxy; (Meyer & Buchta, 2019) and by applying: (a) a Gower distance based on the treatment of each subplot, (b) a cophenetic distance based on the phylogenetic tree of European flora provided by Durka and Michalski (2012), as a proxy of distances between different tree species and (c) a spatial distance between each deadwood object based on the distance-based Morans's eigenvector map (Dray, Legendre, & Peres-Neto, 2006). Distances in species compositions between deadwood objects were calculated as Bray–Curtis distances using the function ‘vegdist’ (Oksanen et al., 2013). The MRM was applied using the function ‘MRM’ (package ecodist; Goslee & Urban, 2017). The same distance matrices were used in the RDA, together with treatment as a factor. The function ‘ANOVA’ was then applied to test the impact of treatment, tree species and space (package vegan; Oksanen et al., 2013). Since the RDA and MRM (see Table S8; Table 1) generated comparable results, only the RDA was used in data interpretation. Effects of treatment and tree species and combinations thereof on gamma-diversity were compared using the rarefaction-extrapolation framework (Chao et al., 2014), implemented in the iNEXT package (Hsieh, Ma, & Chao, 2014). Finally, the combination of tree species and sun exposure yielding the highest gamma-diversity was determined. Deadwood objects shaded by mesh nets were excluded from the analysis, since mesh treatment is not feasible as an integrative strategy to deadwood enrichment. The remaining 72 experimental deadwood objects (six plots × six tree species × sun exposed/canopy shaded) were subjected to random selections of one to 12 different deadwood objects (i.e. only sun-exposed deadwood objects of one tree species or up to one sun-exposed and one canopy-shaded deadwood object of each tree species). To standardize for the amount of exposed deadwood, the sampling effort was rarefied to six deadwood objects (package iNEXT; Hsieh et al., 2014). The same approach was used to calculate a pooled gamma-diversity for combinations of tree species and sun exposure for all taxa associated with the logs. The possible combinations of tree species and sun exposure are listed in Tables S12–S16. During 3 years of sampling, 238 species (16,264 individuals) of saproxylic beetles, 109 species of wood-inhabiting fungi and 126 species (2,421 individuals) of spiders were identified in logs while 57 species (2,189 individuals) of saproxylic beetles were reared from the branches (see Tables S17–S20). The species numbers of all species groups were higher on sun-exposed than on canopy-shaded logs (see Table S2). The species numbers of saproxylic beetles and spiders were lower on the artificially shaded plots than on the canopy-shaded plots but there were no differences in these treatments for wood-inhabiting fungi. Tree species affected the species numbers of saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi but not that of spiders (see Table S3). Species numbers of saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi were highest in logs of Carpinus, Fagus and Populus (Figure 2). A comparison of single tree species showed either higher species numbers in sun-exposed logs or no differences between treatments (see Table S4; Figure 3). A comparison of sun-exposed and canopy-shaded plots showed higher species numbers of saproxylic beetles in logs of Abies, Populus and Quercus, and of wood-inhabiting fungi in logs of Abies, Carpinus, Fagus and Quercus. The species numbers of spiders were highest in logs from the sun-exposed plots, regardless of the tree species. The community composition of saproxylic beetles and spiders, but not of wood-inhabiting fungi, differed significantly between sun-exposed, artificially shaded and canopy-shaded plots (see Figure S5). Community composition in logs of the different tree species differed only for saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi (see Figures S6 and S7). Lower species numbers of saproxylic beetles were found in sun-exposed branches than on artificially shaded and canopy-shaded branches (see Table S2). The species numbers of saproxylic beetles also differed between tree species (see Table S3; Figure 2) and were higher in branches of Abies, Fagus and Quercus than in Carpinus, Pinus and Populus branches. For Carpinus and Pinus, canopy-shaded branches supported a larger number of species than did sun-exposed branches (see Table S4; Figure 3). The community composition of saproxylic beetles did not differ between treatments or tree species (see Figures S5–S7). The beta-diversity of saproxylic beetles in logs was most strongly affected by treatment, followed by tree species and space, while the tree species was most important for wood-inhabiting fungi in logs (Table 1). Spiders in logs were only affected by treatment and space. For saproxylic beetles reared from branches only the tree species, followed by treatment, showed an influence. Overall, an increasing number of tree species, and a larger spatial distance resulted in a higher species turnover. The gamma-diversity across all tree species in logs and branches did not differ between the sun-exposed, canopy-shaded and artificially shaded subplots in any of the analysed taxa (see Figure S9). For all species groups, gamma-diversity differed marginally between logs of the different tree species (see Figure S10) but was significantly lower in Pinus branches than in branches of any of the other tree species. A tree species-specific analysis of the effects of treatments showed generally a lower gamma-diversity of saproxylic beetles on artificially shaded logs than on canopy-shaded logs (see Figure S11). For wood-inhabiting fungi, gamma-diversity on Carpinus logs was lower in the canopy-shaded treatment than in either the artificially shaded or sun-exposed treatment. Spiders had a higher gamma-diversity on Fagus logs that were sun exposed compared to artificially shaded logs. For saproxylic beetles, gamma-diversity was lower in the sun-exposed branches of Carpinus than in the artificially shaded or canopy-shaded branches of the same species. The gamma-diversity resulting from combinations of tree species and sun exposure increased as the number of combined experimental deadwood objects increased (Figure 4) and was highest for combinations of one to five different objects (see Tables S12–S16). For saproxylic beetles in logs, gamma-diversity was highest for the combination of canopy-shaded logs of Carpinus and Pinus and sun-exposed logs of Carpinus (see Table S12). Wood-inhabiting fungi had the highest gamma-diversity in sun-exposed logs of Populus (see Table S13). For spiders, a combination of canopy-shaded Pinus and sun-exposed Populus logs resulted in the highest gamma-diversity (see Table S14). Overall, the combination of shaded Carpinus and sun-exposed Populus logs yielded the highest species numbers of all investigated taxa in logs (see Table S15). For saproxylic beetles in branches, gamma-diversity was highest in canopy-shaded branches of Quercus alone (see Table S16). Our results showed a strong influence of sun exposure and tree species on the alpha- and beta-diversity of saproxylic communities. Divergent from our hypotheses, the effect of sun exposure was generally positive for all taxa recorded in logs, but negative for saproxylic beetles reared from branches. Tree species was of variable importance for taxa of saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi. These results demonstrate the importance of considering tree species and the degree of sun exposures in integrative conservation strategies aimed at enhancing saproxylic biodiversity in European forests. Sun exposure was the most important driver of alpha-diversity across all analysed taxa in logs and for the beta-diversity of saproxylic beetles and spiders, but not for the beta-diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi (see Tables S2 and S4; Table 1). Higher numbers of saproxylic beetle and spider species in sun-exposed logs were among the predictions of this study and consistent with earlier studies (Seibold, Bässler, Baldrian, et al., 2016; Thorn et al., 2016). Our results similarly showed that sun exposure was the most important driver of the beta-diversity of these groups (Table 1). The preference of saproxylic beetles for sun-exposed deadwood was previously described (Seibold, Bässler, et al., 2015; Seibold, Brandl, et al., 2015) and can perhaps be explained by the fact that greater sun exposure increases the body temperature and thus the metabolism of poikilothermic arthropods (Brown, Gillooly, Allen, Savage, & West, 2004; Müller et al., 2015). Spiders might also benefit from sun-exposed deadwood by the increase in their activity resulting from the higher temperatures and by the greater availability of potential prey. Contrasting to our hypothesis, the higher species numbers of wood-inhabiting fungi on sun-exposed logs were, however, surprising, as fungal species numbers were predicted to be higher in the artificially shaded or canopy-shaded logs, as both would have offered a higher humidity (Bässler, Müller, Dziock, & Brandl, 2010; Talley, Coley, & Kursar, 2002). However, the laboratory experiment of Venugopal et al. (2016) showed that fungal activity increases with increasing temperature and humidity. Hence, the higher temperatures in combination with higher humidity might be preferential and have interacted with the activity of wood-inhabiting fungi to promote their species diversity in response to the more rapidly decaying wood. Nonetheless, we detected no differences in fungal species numbers between sun-exposed and artificially shaded plots. In contrast to saproxylic beetles and spiders, sun exposure had lower impact on the beta-diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi than tree species (Table 1). This finding indicates that wood-inhabiting fungi do not underlie large dispersal limitations in our study area and that colonization success of wood-inhabiting fungi is more likely to be determined by tree species than by the spatial distance between deadwood structures (Abrego et al., 2018; Krah et al., 2018). The alpha- and beta-diversity of saproxylic beetles in branches were also influenced by sun exposure (see Tables S2 and S4; Table 1), but divergent from our hypothesis. In theory, sun exposure might have a much stronger effect on deadwood of small than of larger dimensions (Müller et al., 2015). The less constant microclimatic conditions that occur within deadwood of small diameter increase the probability of humidity drainage, in turn challenging the survival and successful larval development of saproxylic beetles. This would explain the lower alpha-diversity of saproxylic beetles determined in our study (see Table S2). Indeed, saproxylic beetles in deadwood of small diameters benefited more from shaded than from sun-exposed conditions, as evidenced by the higher species numbers under artificially shaded and canopy-shaded conditions (see Table S2). For saproxylic beetles in logs, species numbers were highest in Carpinus followed by Populus (Figure 2). Gossner et al. (2016) similarly found that alpha-diversity was higher in Carpinus logs than in the logs of 12 other tree species, but it was lower in Populus logs, although only shaded conditions were investigated in that study. Both Carpinus and Populus as softwood tree species undergo faster decay than, for example, Quercus (Kahl et al., 2017), which might have resulted in a higher diversity of niches per log within the investigated time period and thus a higher species richness. Hardwood tree species with distinct heartwood, including Quercus, also tend to have a higher resistance to decomposers, as the concentrations of tree metabolites are often higher than in sapwood and more toxic (Noll et al., 2016). The lower species numbers of saproxylic beetles in Abies and Pinus are consistent with the production by coniferous tree species of larger amounts of primary and secondary metabolites that prevent colonization (Kahl et al., 2017). Additionally, coniferous tree species have a higher lignin content, which also slows their decomposition (Weedon et al., 2009). Divergent decay rates among tree species might also have been responsible for the differences in the species numbers of saproxylic beetles in logs and branches. The importance of branches, but not of logs from Quercus can be explained by the slower decay rate and thus the greater durability of logs compared to branches. This would extend the time available for the successful colonization and development in deadwood of a larger number of species. Similar to saproxylic beetles, wood-inhabiting fungi had the highest species numbers in logs of Fagus, Carpinus and Populus (Figure 2). This is partially in contrast to the results of a previous study (Purahong et al., 2018b) in which higher numbers of fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were found associated with logs of coniferous than of deciduous trees in early decay, although no basidiomes were recorded and DNA of wood-inhabiting fungal species can be present without fructification. The colonization and fructification of wood-inhabiting fungi are determined by certain characteristics of the host tree species (Purahong et al., 2018), the presence of other fungal species (Fukami et al., 2010) and the amount of time elapsed after the death of the tree (Yuan et al., 2017). Fungal species colonizing coniferous tree species might fructify at a later time than those that colonize broad-leaved tree species, as the larger amounts and longer persistence of metabolites of coniferous trees and the slower rate of decomposition of those species may inhibit fructification (Kahl et al., 2017; Weedon et al., 2009). Larger amounts of metabolites might also reduce the colonization of living trees by endophytic wood-inhabiting fungi, which are inactive in the living tree and become active as it weakens or dies (Parfitt et al., 2010). The alpha-diversity of single tree species across all investigated taxa followed the general positive trend determined for sun exposure (see Tables S2 and S4; Figure 3). However, a positive correlation between sun exposure and the species numbers of the studied taxa (Figure 3) was identified only for shade-intolerant (Quercus, Populus and Pinus), not for shade-tolerant (Fagus, Carpinus and Abies) tree species. These findings suggest that shade-intolerant tree species and their associated communities are adapted to sun-exposed conditions whereas the opposite is the case for shade-tolerant tree species (Lindhe, Lindelöw, & Asenblad, 2005; Müller et al., 2015). For instance, many saproxylic specialists on oak prefer sun-exposed deadwood (Ranius & Jansson, 2000). Our results are in line with those of Gossner et al. (2016), who also reported that the shade preference of tree species did not correlate with alpha-diversity; rather, there was only a general increase in species richness with increasing sun exposure. However, the experimental approach used in those studies was limited to a short canopy-cover gradient ranging from 60% to 100%. The lack of a high sun exposure condition in those studies might have masked potential correlations between the shade tolerance of the different tree species and the species richness of the studied organisms. An influence of spatial distance on beta-diversity was consistently observed, but only for the saproxylic taxa recorded in logs (Table 1). Spatial distance serves as a proxy for several factors, including local stand characteristics, stand management type, the geology of the respective site and the spatial arrangement of the deadwood (Baber et al., 2016; Gossner et al., 2016). Saproxylic species are limited in their dispersal abilities, which range from a few hundreds of metres to a few kilometres (saproxylic beetles) to tens of kilometres (wood-inhabiting-fungi), although studies investigating long-distance dispersal are scarce (Komonen & Müller, 2018). For instance communities of wood-inhabiting fungi analysed by air sampling of spores showed no variation collected <10 km apart in their composition, but >100 km apart sites (Abrego et al., 2018). By contrast, spatial distance had no influence on saproxylic beetles reared from branches. Small-diameter deadwood is more frequent than deadwood of larger diameters and its resource patches are better connected. Moreover, smaller diameters might be colonized by smaller species and in general of larger populations (Bussler et al., 2011). Hence, saproxylic species colonizing smaller diameter deadwood are more equally distributed and do not have to overcome large distances to find new resources suitable for colonization. Overall, the combinations of tree species and sun exposure that supported the highest diversity were composed of Carpinus and Populus together with branches of Quercus and coniferous trees and in part of other broad-leaved tree species (see Tables S12–S16). Those combinations likely merged the most complementary saproxylic communities, as demonstrated by Gossner et al. (2016) and Andringa et al. (2019) for combinations of tree species and of tree species and decay stages. Differences in the community composition of saproxylic taxa have been attributed to differences in sun exposure (Seibold, Bässler, Brandl, et al., 2016) and to the wood-related properties of single tree species (Purahong et al., 2018b). Hence, most of the effectual combinations of sun exposure and tree species seem to depend on the most complementary niches in deadwood. Beside the accumulation of deadwood by passive conservation measures, an active enrichment of deadwood has been promoted to accelerate habitat restoration. However, strategies of active deadwood enrichment in Central European managed forests mainly consist of enriching deadwood amounts at high economic efforts but disregard the recently identified higher importance of deadwood quality and diversity for biodiversity. Our study demonstrated that different tree species and particularly different degrees of sun exposure are needed to effectively promote biodiversity. We therefore recommend to create deadwood structures at sun-exposed forest edges or with the help of gap cuttings. Additionally, standing dead trees or natural disturbances such as wind-throws can be used, as both naturally generate many different types of sun-exposed structures. Based on the six model tree species included in this study, we recommend prioritizing Carpinus, Pinus, Populus and Quercus to achieve the highest diversity among the taxa analysed in this study. Generally, combinations of tree species should include hardwood and softwood broadleaf trees as well as coniferous tree species. Lastly, a landscape wide enrichment of deadwood should be considered to cover different local conditions and to increase the effectiveness of enrichment strategies based on deadwood. S.V. was supported by the Scholarship Program of the German Federal Environmental Foundation. We thank especially Boris Büche, Joseline Griese, Andreas Gminder and Ingmar Weiß for species identification, the forestry administration Ebrach for technical support as well as numerous helpers in the field. M.M.G. and J.M. designed the experiment; S.V., U.M. and S.T. established the study and collected data; S.V., J.M. and S.T. analysed and interpreted the data; S.V. led the writing of the manuscript, with substantial input from all co-authors. All the authors gave their final approval for the publication of the manuscript. Data available via the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rn8pk0p6n (Vogel, Gossner, Mergner, Müller, & Thorn, 2020). Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article." @default.
- W3022384733 created "2020-05-13" @default.
- W3022384733 creator A5000721933 @default.
- W3022384733 creator A5002862503 @default.
- W3022384733 creator A5042399318 @default.
- W3022384733 creator A5045362154 @default.
- W3022384733 creator A5057148458 @default.
- W3022384733 date "2020-06-24" @default.
- W3022384733 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
- W3022384733 title "Optimizing enrichment of deadwood for biodiversity by varying sun exposure and tree species: An experimental approach" @default.
- W3022384733 cites W1562325322 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W1672554666 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W1931677568 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W1951724000 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W1965821606 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2008364286 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2014875363 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2022499517 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2046649434 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2048146571 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2076039876 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2102148959 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2108971311 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2112570676 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2114795157 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2119225691 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2120608313 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2123480948 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2132599590 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2132608592 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2151481737 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2154225693 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2154377865 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2159267296 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2160061095 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2160177241 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2163471072 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2164568072 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2171783890 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2188683326 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2223440733 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2466692542 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2475053462 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2490819332 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2492388958 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2520503011 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2524955821 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2536427458 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2580767461 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2590063642 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2622605761 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2726801217 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2767038868 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2783628884 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2789355934 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2792164505 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2883950919 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2888889797 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2930790428 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W2941437674 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W3023561686 @default.
- W3022384733 cites W804704732 @default.
- W3022384733 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13648" @default.
- W3022384733 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3022384733 type Work @default.
- W3022384733 sameAs 3022384733 @default.
- W3022384733 citedByCount "33" @default.
- W3022384733 countsByYear W30223847332020 @default.
- W3022384733 countsByYear W30223847332021 @default.
- W3022384733 countsByYear W30223847332022 @default.
- W3022384733 countsByYear W30223847332023 @default.
- W3022384733 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3022384733 hasAuthorship W3022384733A5000721933 @default.
- W3022384733 hasAuthorship W3022384733A5002862503 @default.
- W3022384733 hasAuthorship W3022384733A5042399318 @default.
- W3022384733 hasAuthorship W3022384733A5045362154 @default.
- W3022384733 hasAuthorship W3022384733A5057148458 @default.
- W3022384733 hasBestOaLocation W30223847331 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C113174947 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C192158950 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C113174947 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C130217890 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C134306372 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C185933670 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C18903297 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C192158950 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C33923547 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C39432304 @default.
- W3022384733 hasConceptScore W3022384733C86803240 @default.
- W3022384733 hasFunder F4320309954 @default.
- W3022384733 hasIssue "10" @default.