FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3023016752> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3023016752 endingPage "274" @default.
• W3023016752 startingPage "271" @default.
• W3023016752 abstract "ABSTRACT: Internal patterns in PRL autoganzfeld database may shed some light on plausibility of that hypothesis. This hypothesis would predict stronger for sessions where subject is not sure about his ratings, because in those sessions experimenter may be able to influence him or her into another direction. A secondary analysis where scoring in sessions with an extreme rating is compared with scoring in sessions with a lower rating shows opposite trend. Therefore it can be concluded that this pattern does not support auditory sound leakage hypothesis. The PRL autoganzfeld database, which is available for serious independent researchers, is a rich source for secondary analyses. In its original form it consists of 354 records, each describing an individual session in PRL autoganzfeld series. Each record consists of 80 fields with information like time, date, set, target, and ratings, but also gender of sender, receiver, and experimenter, and lots of other dependent measures relating to session, and participants. In course of last few years a number of calculated fields have been added. For instance, number of sessions per day was inferred from time and date information. A number of informal analyses resulted from questions that researchers in field have asked. The results of these analyses were generally discussed within context of electronic discussion group PDF. For example, it turns out that PRL database did not support often heard supposition that having more than 1 session per day is detrimental for results. Also, there appears to be suggestive indications for a gender interaction effect where female experimenters with male receivers produce best results. In this short contribution we will focus on an analysis that was done in order to see if PEL database showed internal patterns that would support or contradict sound leakage hypothesis put forward by Wiseman et al. (Wiseman, R., Smith, M., & Kornbrot, D., 1994). The results of thisanalysis were communicated to Wiseman et al. before they published their report, but although they claim that the likelihood of potential non-psi explanations can also be assessed on basis of whether they account for internal effects (p. 450) they did not include these internal pattern figures in their report. THE SOUND LEAKAGE HYPOTHESIS According to sound leakage hypothesis, sound cues originating with sender could have been perceived by experimenter during an autoganzfeld (AGF) session. The experimenter could have inferred target from these cues and could subsequently have communicated this information to receiver during judging phase of expenment. The authors conclude after an e aborate evaluation of different acoustic pathways from sender to experimenter that within actual situation... it would have been almost impossible to consciously detect sender noise. However, some studies concerned with auditory sensory subliminal perception suggest unconscious registration (p. 449). Thus experimenter is supposed to have not been explicitly aware of target and it must be concluded that influence that experimenter must have exerted on subjects' choice has also been of a similar unconscious nature. Experimenters directly involved in AGF series have generally considered sound leakage hypothesis as a ridiculous proposal. …" @default.
• W3023016752 created "2020-05-13" @default.
• W3023016752 creator A5039848742 @default.
• W3023016752 date "1999-09-01" @default.
• W3023016752 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3023016752 title "The PRL Autoganzfeld revisited: Refuting the Sound Leakage hypothesis." @default.
• W3023016752 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W3023016752 type Work @default.
• W3023016752 sameAs 3023016752 @default.
• W3023016752 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3023016752 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3023016752 hasAuthorship W3023016752A5039848742 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C198104137 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C105795698 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C136764020 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C151730666 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C15744967 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C177264268 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C180747234 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C198104137 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C199360897 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C2779182362 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C2779343474 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C33923547 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C41008148 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C77805123 @default.
• W3023016752 hasConceptScore W3023016752C86803240 @default.
• W3023016752 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3023016752 hasLocation W30230167521 @default.
• W3023016752 hasOpenAccess W3023016752 @default.
• W3023016752 hasPrimaryLocation W30230167521 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W1506323970 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W1767284924 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W1966732228 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W1986758163 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2031089316 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2080847790 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2086947836 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2117735483 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2144108638 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2171732775 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2183941720 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2320374269 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2329337681 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W234359373 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W264058820 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W2770575457 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W6419873 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W72584535 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W1505517546 @default.
• W3023016752 hasRelatedWork W18871412 @default.
• W3023016752 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W3023016752 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3023016752 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3023016752 magId "3023016752" @default.
• W3023016752 workType "article" @default.