FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3023373311> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3023373311 endingPage "507" @default.
• W3023373311 startingPage "507" @default.
• W3023373311 abstract "Much of our current understanding of physiology and cell biology is based on work in animals and established cell lines, but what if certain physiologic responses or intracellular mechanisms are specific to the sex of the animal or the sexual genome of that specific cell line? As many physiologists appreciate, certain animal experiments are easier to perform in either male or female animals; some animals are more readily available as the male or female sex. Cell lines may have a certain phenotype of interest, for example, malignancy, but has the genome of these cell lines arisen from a single “donor” and thereafter cloned many, many times, for instance, the HeLa cells? What if the donor was a male or a female? Does the genomic programming (not the phenotype but rather the genotype) affect intracellular signaling, mitochondrial function, cell-surface expression of certain receptors, immune response, etc. In this treatise by Yoon et al, the authors question (and challenge—rightfully so) previous work, much of which was carried out in animal models/cell lines in which the sex of the animal or cell lines, not the phenotype, was neither defined, possibly even known, and most importantly, probably not appreciated.Moreover, many/most studies never address the possible differences in men versus women. The editors understand this concept, appreciate its importance, and have now required authors to define the sex of the animal models studied and at least provide more insight into the origin of various cell lines used. This work by Yoon et al may prove to be a very valuable addition to the design of future studies across many disciplines. We ask the question again—Have some of the principles of physiology or cell biology that we accept as gospel been derived from a unisex model that might not be true in the other sex? The future will then be to address how other variables may influence the results – race, age, weight, etc. Much of our current understanding of physiology and cell biology is based on work in animals and established cell lines, but what if certain physiologic responses or intracellular mechanisms are specific to the sex of the animal or the sexual genome of that specific cell line? As many physiologists appreciate, certain animal experiments are easier to perform in either male or female animals; some animals are more readily available as the male or female sex. Cell lines may have a certain phenotype of interest, for example, malignancy, but has the genome of these cell lines arisen from a single “donor” and thereafter cloned many, many times, for instance, the HeLa cells? What if the donor was a male or a female? Does the genomic programming (not the phenotype but rather the genotype) affect intracellular signaling, mitochondrial function, cell-surface expression of certain receptors, immune response, etc. In this treatise by Yoon et al, the authors question (and challenge—rightfully so) previous work, much of which was carried out in animal models/cell lines in which the sex of the animal or cell lines, not the phenotype, was neither defined, possibly even known, and most importantly, probably not appreciated. Moreover, many/most studies never address the possible differences in men versus women. The editors understand this concept, appreciate its importance, and have now required authors to define the sex of the animal models studied and at least provide more insight into the origin of various cell lines used. This work by Yoon et al may prove to be a very valuable addition to the design of future studies across many disciplines. We ask the question again—Have some of the principles of physiology or cell biology that we accept as gospel been derived from a unisex model that might not be true in the other sex? The future will then be to address how other variables may influence the results – race, age, weight, etc. Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical researchSurgeryVol. 156Issue 3PreviewAlthough the Revitalization Act was passed in 1993 to increase enrollment of women in clinical trials, there has been little focus on sex disparity in basic and translational research. We hypothesize that sex bias exists in surgical biomedical research. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W3023373311 created "2020-05-13" @default.
• W3023373311 creator A5009676742 @default.
• W3023373311 creator A5071291870 @default.
• W3023373311 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W3023373311 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3023373311 title "Message from the Editors" @default.
• W3023373311 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.003" @default.
• W3023373311 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25175500" @default.
• W3023373311 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W3023373311 type Work @default.
• W3023373311 sameAs 3023373311 @default.
• W3023373311 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3023373311 countsByYear W30233733112015 @default.
• W3023373311 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3023373311 hasAuthorship W3023373311A5009676742 @default.
• W3023373311 hasAuthorship W3023373311A5071291870 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C127716648 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C1491633281 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C79879829 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C81885089 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C104317684 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C127716648 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C1491633281 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C54355233 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C71924100 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C79879829 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C81885089 @default.
• W3023373311 hasConceptScore W3023373311C86803240 @default.
• W3023373311 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3023373311 hasLocation W30233733111 @default.
• W3023373311 hasLocation W30233733112 @default.
• W3023373311 hasOpenAccess W3023373311 @default.
• W3023373311 hasPrimaryLocation W30233733111 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W2039317398 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W2077667255 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W2088133224 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W2088551093 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W2124550533 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W2225623601 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W2389266410 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W3045308325 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W4214822437 @default.
• W3023373311 hasRelatedWork W4214891786 @default.
• W3023373311 hasVolume "156" @default.
• W3023373311 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3023373311 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3023373311 magId "3023373311" @default.
• W3023373311 workType "article" @default.