FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3024062273> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3024062273 endingPage "e14161" @default.
• W3024062273 startingPage "e14161" @default.
• W3024062273 abstract "Interpersonal communication is critical for a healthy romantic relationship. Emotional disclosure, coupled with perceived partner responsiveness, fosters closeness and adjustment (better mood and relationship satisfaction). On the contrary, holding back from disclosure is associated with increased distress and decreased relationship satisfaction. Prior studies assessing these constructs have been cross-sectional and have utilized global retrospective reports of communication. In addition, studies assessing holding back or perceived partner responsiveness have not taken advantage of smartphone ownership for data collection and have instead required website access or use of a study-provided device.This study aimed to examine the (1) usability and acceptability of a smartphone app designed to assess partner communication, closeness, mood, and relationship satisfaction over 14 days and (2) between-person versus within-person variability of key constructs to inform the utility of their capture via ecological momentary assessment using the participants' own handheld devices.Adult community volunteers in a married or cohabiting partnered relationship received 2 smartphone prompts per day, one in the afternoon and one in the evening, for 14 days. In each prompt, participants were asked whether they had conversed with their partner either since awakening (afternoon prompt) or since the last assessment (evening prompt). If yes, a series of items assessed enacted communication, perceived partner communication, closeness, mood, and relationship satisfaction (evening only). Participants were interviewed by phone, 1 week after the end of the 14-day phase, to assess perceptions of the app. Content analysis was employed to identify key themes.Participants (N=27; mean age 36, SD 12 years; 24/27, 89% female; 25/27, 93% white and 2/27, 7% Hispanic) responded to 79.2% (555/701) of the total prompts sent and completed 553 (78.9%) of those assessments. Of the responded prompts, 79.3% (440/555) were characterized by a report of having conversed with one's partner. The app was seen as highly convenient (mean 4.15, SD 0.78, scale: 1-5) and easy to use (mean 4.39, SD 0.70, scale: 1-5). Qualitative analyses indicated that participants found the app generally easy to navigate, but the response window too short (45 min) and the random nature of receiving notifications vexing. With regard to the variability of the app-delivered items, intraclass correlation coefficients were generally <0.40, indicating that the majority of the variability in each measure was at the within-person level. Notable exceptions were enacted disclosure and relationship satisfaction.The findings of this study support the usability and acceptability of the app, with valuable user input to modify timing windows in future work. The findings also underscore the utility of an intensive repeated-measures approach, given the meaningful day-to-day variation (greater within-person vs between-person variability) in communication and mood." @default.
• W3024062273 created "2020-05-21" @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5005815587 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5008177460 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5032848575 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5038248166 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5043276724 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5049694130 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5052065796 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5054005844 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5062026466 @default.
• W3024062273 creator A5079684390 @default.
• W3024062273 date "2020-07-06" @default.
• W3024062273 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3024062273 title "Usability and Acceptability of a Smartphone App to Assess Partner Communication, Closeness, Mood, and Relationship Satisfaction: Mixed Methods Study" @default.
• W3024062273 cites W1493363413 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W1915733858 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W1985106592 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W1995082594 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2007486119 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2010014278 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2020236639 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2025013815 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2026952245 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2034587463 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2059442248 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2073703425 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2088692173 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2089228198 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2095102834 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2113630281 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2120574540 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2130042179 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2133674686 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2134563037 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2155002669 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2161879067 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2166026554 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2166190112 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2329241953 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2510423469 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2518324588 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2593483004 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2610951673 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2625383224 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2753518399 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2799280155 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2892194080 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2897589001 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2901717457 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2917381983 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2964904301 @default.
• W3024062273 cites W2979986229 @default.
• W3024062273 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/14161" @default.
• W3024062273 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7381078" @default.
• W3024062273 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32628614" @default.
• W3024062273 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3024062273 type Work @default.
• W3024062273 sameAs 3024062273 @default.
• W3024062273 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3024062273 countsByYear W30240622732020 @default.
• W3024062273 countsByYear W30240622732021 @default.
• W3024062273 countsByYear W30240622732022 @default.
• W3024062273 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5005815587 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5008177460 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5032848575 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5038248166 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5043276724 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5049694130 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5052065796 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5054005844 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5062026466 @default.
• W3024062273 hasAuthorship W3024062273A5079684390 @default.
• W3024062273 hasBestOaLocation W30240622731 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C164850336 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C2776476923 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C2779545769 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C2780733359 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C107457646 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C121332964 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C1276947 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C134306372 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C15744967 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C164850336 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C170130773 @default.
• W3024062273 hasConceptScore W3024062273C2776476923 @default.

• next