FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3024370538> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3024370538 endingPage "611" @default.
• W3024370538 startingPage "607" @default.
• W3024370538 abstract "To evaluate the clinical results of locking proximal femur plate(LPFP), proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty(BPH) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.Retrospective analysis of the 86 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures during June 2011 and August 2016 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups: 26 cases in LPFP group included 10 males and 16 females with an average age of (72.54±4.78) years old, 5 cases of type II of Evans, 12 cases of type III and 9 cases of type IV; 39 cases in PFNA group included 17 males and 22 females with an average age of 74.41±5.65, 11 cases of type II, 18 cases of type III and 10 cases of type IV; 21 cases in BPH group included 9 males and 12 females with an average age of 76.23±6.97, 1 case of type II, 10 cases of type III and 10 cases of type IV. The data of three groups were collected for statistical analysis on the following aspects: operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and Harris score of the hip joint function.The wound healed well and no complication occurred. Eighty-four cases were follow-up, while 2 cases were lost, the follow-up rate was 97.6%. The patients were followed up for 22 to 41 months with an average of 26.3 months. For comparison of operation time and time of the hospital stay, BPH group was shorter than the LPFP and PFNA group(F=19.782, 21.981, P<0.05). For comparison of the intraoperative blood loss, the BPH group was less blood loss than the LPFP and PFNA group(F=12.976, P<0.05), while there was no significant means between the LPFP and PFNA group(t=10.879, P>0.05). For comparison of the postoperative complications, LPFP group was higher than BHP and PFNA group(F=30.976, P<0.05), while there was no significant means between LPFP and PFNA group(t=9.902, P>0.05). For comparison of the Harris score of the hip joint at 1 year after operation, BPH and PFNA group were both higher than LPFP group(F=19.692, P<0.05), while there was no significant means between BPH and PFNA group (t=4.971, P>0.05).For elder patient with femoral intertrochanteric fracture, BPH could be the best optional for the shorter operation time and less complications. And the PFNA also could be optional choice for the patients while the LPFP was forbidden for the elder patients." @default.
• W3024370538 created "2020-05-21" @default.
• W3024370538 creator A5033164005 @default.
• W3024370538 creator A5059022745 @default.
• W3024370538 creator A5059760738 @default.
• W3024370538 creator A5077706721 @default.
• W3024370538 date "2017-07-25" @default.
• W3024370538 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3024370538 title "[Clinical analysis of LPFP, PFNA and BPH in treating femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients]." @default.
• W3024370538 doi "https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.005" @default.
• W3024370538 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29424148" @default.
• W3024370538 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W3024370538 type Work @default.
• W3024370538 sameAs 3024370538 @default.
• W3024370538 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3024370538 countsByYear W30243705382021 @default.
• W3024370538 countsByYear W30243705382022 @default.
• W3024370538 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3024370538 hasAuthorship W3024370538A5033164005 @default.
• W3024370538 hasAuthorship W3024370538A5059022745 @default.
• W3024370538 hasAuthorship W3024370538A5059760738 @default.
• W3024370538 hasAuthorship W3024370538A5077706721 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C2776211809 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C2780554211 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C2991743468 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C3019737254 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C141071460 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C167135981 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C2776211809 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C2778336525 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C2780554211 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C2991743468 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C3019737254 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C71924100 @default.
• W3024370538 hasConceptScore W3024370538C81182388 @default.
• W3024370538 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3024370538 hasLocation W30243705381 @default.
• W3024370538 hasOpenAccess W3024370538 @default.
• W3024370538 hasPrimaryLocation W30243705381 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2356926998 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2364187227 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2368271611 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2375173177 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2377634484 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2388826795 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2551994224 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W2978322787 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W3030753595 @default.
• W3024370538 hasRelatedWork W3031394689 @default.
• W3024370538 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W3024370538 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3024370538 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3024370538 magId "3024370538" @default.
• W3024370538 workType "article" @default.