Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3024464527> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 80 of
80
with 100 items per page.
- W3024464527 endingPage "593" @default.
- W3024464527 startingPage "585" @default.
- W3024464527 abstract "Every organization wants to run with profit only and it is a common trend to acquire the new technologies, methods and models to enhance the quality of software product. Quality of product is directly proportional to the value of the product and the profit of the organization. Different quality model are used by different organization foundation upon the requirements. Different thoughts of software quality attributes with various software quality models are evaluated and examined in this survey. Also researcher performed comparative study of different software quality models utilized by different organizations. Making software by using open source software (OSS) and commercial of the shelf (COTS) component is very useful for any organization. So as to quantify quality in software, quality models can be used to check the quality of existing COTS and OSS software components. The purpose of this research is to do the comparative study to check software quality prediction using COTS and OSS components. In this survey the researcher do study of more than 100 papers and identified that OSS as the development technique is more better then COTS development. Because COTS development is black box in nature, so some tradition quality metrics cannot be apply but in case of OSS as development methodology source code is available. So we can apply all software quality metrics to assess the OSS quality. But still there is no proper technique, model and tool is available by which we can evaluate the quality of OSS. In future the researcher can improve the software quality by creating some tools and models for estimation of quality characteristics according to the modified ISO-9126 quality assurance model for OSS." @default.
- W3024464527 created "2020-05-21" @default.
- W3024464527 creator A5006479709 @default.
- W3024464527 creator A5010379237 @default.
- W3024464527 creator A5039235003 @default.
- W3024464527 creator A5048894747 @default.
- W3024464527 date "2020-02-17" @default.
- W3024464527 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3024464527 title "A systematic literature review and comparative study of different software quality models" @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2047923533 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2076081773 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2095436771 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2099402163 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2101519029 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2140243388 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2220771328 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2761482520 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2770331094 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2770356892 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W2952481429 @default.
- W3024464527 cites W4231804988 @default.
- W3024464527 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2020.1747188" @default.
- W3024464527 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3024464527 type Work @default.
- W3024464527 sameAs 3024464527 @default.
- W3024464527 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W3024464527 countsByYear W30244645272020 @default.
- W3024464527 countsByYear W30244645272021 @default.
- W3024464527 countsByYear W30244645272022 @default.
- W3024464527 countsByYear W30244645272023 @default.
- W3024464527 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3024464527 hasAuthorship W3024464527A5006479709 @default.
- W3024464527 hasAuthorship W3024464527A5010379237 @default.
- W3024464527 hasAuthorship W3024464527A5039235003 @default.
- W3024464527 hasAuthorship W3024464527A5048894747 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C117447612 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C176035894 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C188329197 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C48306297 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConcept C529173508 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C111472728 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C115903868 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C117447612 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C138885662 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C176035894 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C188329197 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C199360897 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C2777904410 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C2779530757 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C41008148 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C48306297 @default.
- W3024464527 hasConceptScore W3024464527C529173508 @default.
- W3024464527 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W3024464527 hasLocation W30244645271 @default.
- W3024464527 hasOpenAccess W3024464527 @default.
- W3024464527 hasPrimaryLocation W30244645271 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W1514039603 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W2104023961 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W2152524519 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W2154905013 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W2182174874 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W2186344636 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W4251546000 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W4297538176 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W2156326464 @default.
- W3024464527 hasRelatedWork W2184812271 @default.
- W3024464527 hasVolume "23" @default.
- W3024464527 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3024464527 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3024464527 magId "3024464527" @default.
- W3024464527 workType "article" @default.