FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3024471208> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3024471208 endingPage "152" @default.
• W3024471208 startingPage "147" @default.
• W3024471208 abstract "PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The standard procedure in treating distal humerus fractures is the open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The surgical approach is still a matter of discussion. The submitted study focuses on comparing the conventional approach with olecranon osteotomy and the paratricipital approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS Since January 2015 a total of 18 patients have been operated on, who met the inclusion criteria of the study on type C distal humerus fracture without the use of olecranon osteotomy. This group of patients was subsequently compared with a control group of patients in whom the olecranon osteotomy was performed in the period 2010-2015. The patients were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the range of motion and complications, including the need for removal of osteosynthesis material. RESULTS The control group (Group 1), in which 22 patients operated directly by olecranon osteotomy were assessed, was compared with the group of operated patients (Group 2) consisting of 18 patients. When comparing the range of motion and MEPS, no significant difference was found between the groups (flexion: p = 0.519, extension: p = 0.382, MEPS: p = 0.110). Unlike Group 2, in Group 1 the osteosynthesis material of cerclage was removed in 13 cases. DISCUSSION Apart from the complexity of fracture and choice of fixation technique, it is the choice of surgical approach which constitutes another factor having effect on the final elbow function. Basically, the approaches to distal humerus can be divided into 4 groups, namely splitting, reflecting and sparing approaches and olecranon osteotomy which offers the best access to the fracture during fixation and which is recommended by many experts in treating these complex fractures which, however, has its disadvantages such as longer duration of surgery, longer healing time, non-union or malunion, protruding osteosynthesis material and secondary procedures necessary to remove the material. CONCLUSIONS In our study no significant difference in functional outcomes was found between the examined approaches. A difference was identified with respect to protruding material of the cerclage and soft tissue irritation with subsequent removal of osteosynthesis material after the olecranon osteotomy. Key words:distal humerus fracture, internal fixation, surgical approach, olecranon osteotomy, paratricipital approach, tricepssparing approach, triceps reflecting anconeus pedicle approach." @default.
• W3024471208 created "2020-05-21" @default.
• W3024471208 creator A5002161747 @default.
• W3024471208 creator A5022321729 @default.
• W3024471208 creator A5050602106 @default.
• W3024471208 creator A5084199295 @default.
• W3024471208 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W3024471208 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W3024471208 title "Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches for Osteosynthesis of Intraarticular Distal Humerus Fractures and Suggested New Treatment Algorithm for These Fractures" @default.
• W3024471208 cites W1828885056 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W1966576822 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W1972990697 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W1986137199 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2012163927 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2018551253 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2019768542 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2028880142 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2031874689 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2035788217 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2045074791 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2054868036 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2073161777 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2075145329 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2078385812 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2090849175 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2106870338 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2109576172 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2139291452 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2400991488 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2463720002 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W2770931452 @default.
• W3024471208 cites W4296315177 @default.
• W3024471208 doi "https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2019/021" @default.
• W3024471208 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31070575" @default.
• W3024471208 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3024471208 type Work @default.
• W3024471208 sameAs 3024471208 @default.
• W3024471208 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3024471208 countsByYear W30244712082022 @default.
• W3024471208 countsByYear W30244712082023 @default.
• W3024471208 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3024471208 hasAuthorship W3024471208A5002161747 @default.
• W3024471208 hasAuthorship W3024471208A5022321729 @default.
• W3024471208 hasAuthorship W3024471208A5050602106 @default.
• W3024471208 hasAuthorship W3024471208A5084199295 @default.
• W3024471208 hasBestOaLocation W30244712081 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2776206872 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2777304102 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2779330695 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2780711802 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C111335779 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C141071460 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C146249460 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2524010 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2776206872 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2776389721 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2777304102 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2779330695 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2780660378 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2780711802 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2781184374 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C2908647359 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C33923547 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C60465272 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C71924100 @default.
• W3024471208 hasConceptScore W3024471208C99454951 @default.
• W3024471208 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3024471208 hasLocation W30244712081 @default.
• W3024471208 hasLocation W30244712082 @default.
• W3024471208 hasOpenAccess W3024471208 @default.
• W3024471208 hasPrimaryLocation W30244712081 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W138938131 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W1479871144 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W2377476321 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W2587846616 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W2952393054 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W2995043995 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W3013788358 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W3175815326 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W4283327374 @default.
• W3024471208 hasRelatedWork W4317528624 @default.
• W3024471208 hasVolume "86" @default.
• W3024471208 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3024471208 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3024471208 magId "3024471208" @default.
• W3024471208 workType "article" @default.