FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3024509284> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3024509284 endingPage "847.e1" @default.
• W3024509284 startingPage "838" @default.
• W3024509284 abstract "•Adjust the PISA assumptions to the type of mitral regurgitation encountered. •Consider the width and radius of the PISA to quantify functional mitral regurgitation. •To quantify double-jets mitral regurgitation, both PISA should be considered. Background Doppler echocardiographic methods, such as the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method, are used to quantify mitral regurgitations (MRs). However, their accuracy and reproducibility are still being discussed, especially in the case of MR of complex geometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the PISA method depending on the shape and number of regurgitant flows. Methods First, various MR shapes and severities (central, oblong, and multiple-jet MR) were mimicked in a left heart simulator. The effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) was calculated using the standard and modified PISA methods and was compared to a reference value obtained from an electromagnetic flowmeter. Second, in order to clinically validate the in vitro findings, 16 patients were examined with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The results were analyzed by comparing the PISA method and the echocardiographic 2D quantitative volumetric method. Results Both hemicylindrical and hemiellipsoidal PISA assumptions improved the quantification of the EROA for oblong MR compared with the traditional PISA method (hemispherical PISA assumption: 11 ± 4.6 mm2, P < .01; hemicylindrical PISA assumption: 2 ± 0.8 mm2, P = .83; hemiellipsoidal PISA assumption: 6 ± 3.7 mm2, P = .05). In the case of multiple jets of different sizes, an improved EROA calculation was measured when both jets were considered (single hemispherical PISA assumption: 4.5 ± 0.7 mm2, P < .01; double hemispherical PISA assumption: 2 ± 1.1 mm2, P = .64). Conclusion For a correct diagnosis of MR, the PISA geometry must be considered. A measurement of both PISA radius and PISA width is necessary for an accurate quantification of an oblong MR. In the case of a double-jet MR, a measurement of the two radii is recommended. Doppler echocardiographic methods, such as the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method, are used to quantify mitral regurgitations (MRs). However, their accuracy and reproducibility are still being discussed, especially in the case of MR of complex geometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the PISA method depending on the shape and number of regurgitant flows. First, various MR shapes and severities (central, oblong, and multiple-jet MR) were mimicked in a left heart simulator. The effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) was calculated using the standard and modified PISA methods and was compared to a reference value obtained from an electromagnetic flowmeter. Second, in order to clinically validate the in vitro findings, 16 patients were examined with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The results were analyzed by comparing the PISA method and the echocardiographic 2D quantitative volumetric method. Both hemicylindrical and hemiellipsoidal PISA assumptions improved the quantification of the EROA for oblong MR compared with the traditional PISA method (hemispherical PISA assumption: 11 ± 4.6 mm2, P < .01; hemicylindrical PISA assumption: 2 ± 0.8 mm2, P = .83; hemiellipsoidal PISA assumption: 6 ± 3.7 mm2, P = .05). In the case of multiple jets of different sizes, an improved EROA calculation was measured when both jets were considered (single hemispherical PISA assumption: 4.5 ± 0.7 mm2, P < .01; double hemispherical PISA assumption: 2 ± 1.1 mm2, P = .64). For a correct diagnosis of MR, the PISA geometry must be considered. A measurement of both PISA radius and PISA width is necessary for an accurate quantification of an oblong MR. In the case of a double-jet MR, a measurement of the two radii is recommended." @default.
• W3024509284 created "2020-05-21" @default.
• W3024509284 creator A5020565399 @default.
• W3024509284 creator A5024126564 @default.
• W3024509284 creator A5054218296 @default.
• W3024509284 creator A5054973088 @default.
• W3024509284 creator A5083828441 @default.
• W3024509284 date "2020-07-01" @default.
• W3024509284 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W3024509284 title "In Vitro Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation of Complex Geometry by the Modified Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method" @default.
• W3024509284 cites W1606134853 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W1965906087 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2017368257 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2019587008 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2025520169 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2033871286 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2037094635 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2040230057 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2052475385 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2088642712 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2092902993 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2095753497 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2111183899 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2112765803 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2122694177 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2132686646 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2136335380 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2140809814 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2155576173 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2591829721 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2596797126 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2751630023 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2795166628 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2886738924 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2888290077 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2889688444 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W2904560400 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W3138481475 @default.
• W3024509284 cites W4239414585 @default.
• W3024509284 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.008" @default.
• W3024509284 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32418654" @default.
• W3024509284 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3024509284 type Work @default.
• W3024509284 sameAs 3024509284 @default.
• W3024509284 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3024509284 countsByYear W30245092842020 @default.
• W3024509284 countsByYear W30245092842021 @default.
• W3024509284 countsByYear W30245092842022 @default.
• W3024509284 countsByYear W30245092842023 @default.
• W3024509284 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3024509284 hasAuthorship W3024509284A5020565399 @default.
• W3024509284 hasAuthorship W3024509284A5024126564 @default.
• W3024509284 hasAuthorship W3024509284A5054218296 @default.
• W3024509284 hasAuthorship W3024509284A5054973088 @default.
• W3024509284 hasAuthorship W3024509284A5083828441 @default.
• W3024509284 hasBestOaLocation W30245092841 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C119947313 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C194242075 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C2777543888 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C2780168065 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C2993279022 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C2993373945 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C3019130837 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C529618451 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C105702510 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C105795698 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C119947313 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C121332964 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C126838900 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C164705383 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C194242075 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C2524010 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C2777543888 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C2780168065 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C2989005 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C2993279022 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C2993373945 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C3019130837 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C33923547 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C529618451 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C57879066 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C71924100 @default.
• W3024509284 hasConceptScore W3024509284C9893847 @default.
• W3024509284 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3024509284 hasLocation W30245092841 @default.
• W3024509284 hasLocation W30245092842 @default.
• W3024509284 hasLocation W30245092843 @default.

• next