FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3024765186> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3024765186 endingPage "781" @default.
• W3024765186 startingPage "727" @default.
• W3024765186 abstract "Purpose In the context of the trade war in full swing, the global supply chain systems have experienced a serious shock and become very vulnerable. The purpose of this paper is to explore the intertwining effects between the export-supporting subsidy policy and the import-deterring tariff policy to develop better insights for trade policy-making under the intra-industry-trade (IIT) conflicts. The research results may provide the trade policy makers and international businesses with better insights in making rational trade policy and business decisions. Design/methodology/approach Two-stage game-/bargaining-theoretical models for the dual competing international supply chains with a unilateral/bilateral tariff imposing or subsidy implementing under six different scenarios of IIT conflict are developed, analyzed and compared. On this basis, the corresponding numerical analyses are conducted to assess the impact of the tariff and subsidy policies and derive the trade policy implications and business insights. Findings The research results indicate that: (1) the bilateral subsidy implementing from both governments is the best policy for all stakeholders in two countries, which would lead to the highest profits, social welfare and consumer surplus than those of the other scenarios; (2) the bilateral tariff imposing of both governments is the worst policy for all stakeholders in two countries, which would lead to the lowest profits, social welfare and consumer surplus than those of the other scenarios; (3) the fair trade scenario without tariff imposing and subsidy implementing turns out to be the second-best trade policy for the governments. Under the World Trade Organization rule and fair-trade principles, the bilateral subsidy policy is not allowed in most of the cases. Thus, adopting a fair-trade policy may be the most appropriate trade policy for two trading countries. Originality/value The modeling approach developed for this study is original and innovative due to the following characteristics. First, based on three trade policy alternatives – fair trade , tariff imposing and subsidy implementing – of two generic governments under IIT conflict, nine different combinations of three policy alternatives are defined. Second, excluding the symmetrical combinations, six IIT conflict scenarios under various tariff/subsidy policy pairs ranging from no conflict to high conflict are assumed for two dual competing international supply chains. Third, a novel two-stage game-/bargaining-theoretical modeling approach is applied to investigate the optimal/equilibrium decisions regarding pricing, ordering quantity and their critical economic outcomes for all possible trade policy scenarios. Fourth, this study lays down a research foundation for the future trade conflict study using a game-theoretical modeling approach." @default.
• W3024765186 created "2020-05-21" @default.
• W3024765186 creator A5011247748 @default.
• W3024765186 creator A5057723713 @default.
• W3024765186 creator A5074878515 @default.
• W3024765186 date "2020-05-07" @default.
• W3024765186 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3024765186 title "Imposing tariff or implementing subsidy?" @default.
• W3024765186 cites W1975192801 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W1988128519 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W1988172690 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2017990047 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2029031896 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2029585856 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2062957830 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2076005379 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2079954586 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2080193198 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2082183964 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2100604203 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2286499438 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2317566511 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2347201762 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2602864448 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2752096741 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2767947761 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2769409617 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2770131998 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2775670358 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2789734341 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2791663454 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2794195944 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W2794571297 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W3123261330 @default.
• W3024765186 cites W4246355649 @default.
• W3024765186 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-10-2018-0165" @default.
• W3024765186 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3024765186 type Work @default.
• W3024765186 sameAs 3024765186 @default.
• W3024765186 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3024765186 countsByYear W30247651862022 @default.
• W3024765186 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3024765186 hasAuthorship W3024765186A5011247748 @default.
• W3024765186 hasAuthorship W3024765186A5057723713 @default.
• W3024765186 hasAuthorship W3024765186A5074878515 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C140413371 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C18547055 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C2776060655 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C84265765 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C140413371 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C144133560 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C151730666 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C155202549 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C162324750 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C18547055 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C2776060655 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C2779343474 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C34447519 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C84265765 @default.
• W3024765186 hasConceptScore W3024765186C86803240 @default.
• W3024765186 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3024765186 hasLocation W30247651861 @default.
• W3024765186 hasOpenAccess W3024765186 @default.
• W3024765186 hasPrimaryLocation W30247651861 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W1504650465 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W1512498437 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W1515631719 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W1533627612 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W1560090733 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W1586098065 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W2091828047 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W2134984620 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W2461433587 @default.
• W3024765186 hasRelatedWork W368457901 @default.
• W3024765186 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W3024765186 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3024765186 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3024765186 magId "3024765186" @default.
• W3024765186 workType "article" @default.