FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3027985890> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3027985890 abstract "Teaching any law subject is inevitably a struggle to reconcile theory with practice, but administrative law offers its own particular challenges in this regard. Despite its potentially rich subject matter and its ability to intersect with other areas of law, a lack of perceptible cohesion and a ‘disconnect’ with the ‘real world’ continues to vex students and teachers of administrative law alike. Understanding how merits review, judicial review and other accountability mechanisms ‘fit together’, and how they interact with the various judicial and quasi-judicial institutions as well as primary and delegated legislation and government policy, can be a herculean task. Students often find connecting the theory and principles of administrative law with ‘real life’ legal and social situations confounding, which is exacerbated by the fact that administrative law does not deal with one cohesive subject matter or legislative scheme but crosses a variety of subject matters, the only unifying factor being government regulation. Further, principles of judicial review and the framework for merits and judicial review can prove conceptually challenging and students can find the material dry and uninteresting. Whilst this affliction is by no means unique to administrative law, when combined with issues of cohesion and disconnect, administrative law presents distinct pedagogical challenges for its teachers. The challenges that administrative law poses for its teachers and learners have not been overlooked in legal education scholarship. Common to this research is recognition of the need to ‘contextualise’ administrative law, or place it in the ‘real world’. Methods suggested include the use of topical issues that can help place administrative law in a historical, political and socio-economic context, express incorporation of indigenous content, investigation of the work of citizen advocate services and the utilisation of clients through clinical legal education. Might mooting, a rite of passage for all law students, help students contextualise administrative law through an understanding of how a matter proceeds through the levels of review? Could mooting help create the elusive connection between theory and practice? This paper reports upon on a three-year pilot of an assessable moot that was introduced into the subject Administrative Law at the University of Wollongong in 2016. Structured student feedback provides an insight into the pedagogical and administrative challenges and successes of assessable moots in promoting a skills-based, student-centred learning experience that encourages the development of advocacy skills and substantive knowledge that may be transferred to professional practice." @default.
• W3027985890 created "2020-05-29" @default.
• W3027985890 creator A5034458269 @default.
• W3027985890 date "2020-05-21" @default.
• W3027985890 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3027985890 title "Assessable Moots in Administrative Law: The Role of Student Feedback in Creating Cohesion" @default.
• W3027985890 doi "https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.12914" @default.
• W3027985890 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3027985890 type Work @default.
• W3027985890 sameAs 3027985890 @default.
• W3027985890 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3027985890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3027985890 hasAuthorship W3027985890A5034458269 @default.
• W3027985890 hasBestOaLocation W30279858901 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C58583792 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C144024400 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C17744445 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C199539241 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C2776007630 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C2777351106 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C2778061430 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C48764862 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C58583792 @default.
• W3027985890 hasConceptScore W3027985890C83009810 @default.
• W3027985890 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3027985890 hasLocation W30279858901 @default.
• W3027985890 hasOpenAccess W3027985890 @default.
• W3027985890 hasPrimaryLocation W30279858901 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2115878287 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2349206851 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2354973714 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2355159130 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2378637038 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2381679920 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2384168330 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W2385749796 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W3138981827 @default.
• W3027985890 hasRelatedWork W4287887782 @default.
• W3027985890 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W3027985890 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3027985890 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3027985890 magId "3027985890" @default.
• W3027985890 workType "article" @default.