FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3028484854> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3028484854 endingPage "e20346" @default.
• W3028484854 startingPage "e20346" @default.
• W3028484854 abstract "Background The high demand for health care services and the growing capability of artificial intelligence have led to the development of conversational agents designed to support a variety of health-related activities, including behavior change, treatment support, health monitoring, training, triage, and screening support. Automation of these tasks could free clinicians to focus on more complex work and increase the accessibility to health care services for the public. An overarching assessment of the acceptability, usability, and effectiveness of these agents in health care is needed to collate the evidence so that future development can target areas for improvement and potential for sustainable adoption. Objective This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness and usability of conversational agents in health care and identify the elements that users like and dislike to inform future research and development of these agents. Methods PubMed, Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Web of Science, and the Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library were systematically searched for articles published since 2008 that evaluated unconstrained natural language processing conversational agents used in health care. EndNote (version X9, Clarivate Analytics) reference management software was used for initial screening, and full-text screening was conducted by 1 reviewer. Data were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer and validated by another. Results A total of 31 studies were selected and included a variety of conversational agents, including 14 chatbots (2 of which were voice chatbots), 6 embodied conversational agents (3 of which were interactive voice response calls, virtual patients, and speech recognition screening systems), 1 contextual question-answering agent, and 1 voice recognition triage system. Overall, the evidence reported was mostly positive or mixed. Usability and satisfaction performed well (27/30 and 26/31), and positive or mixed effectiveness was found in three-quarters of the studies (23/30). However, there were several limitations of the agents highlighted in specific qualitative feedback. Conclusions The studies generally reported positive or mixed evidence for the effectiveness, usability, and satisfactoriness of the conversational agents investigated, but qualitative user perceptions were more mixed. The quality of many of the studies was limited, and improved study design and reporting are necessary to more accurately evaluate the usefulness of the agents in health care and identify key areas for improvement. Further research should also analyze the cost-effectiveness, privacy, and security of the agents. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/16934" @default.
• W3028484854 created "2020-05-29" @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5016763292 @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5022362845 @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5027399159 @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5046353834 @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5060629377 @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5068314952 @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5070253070 @default.
• W3028484854 creator A5081487022 @default.
• W3028484854 date "2020-10-22" @default.
• W3028484854 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W3028484854 title "The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review" @default.
• W3028484854 cites W1976639658 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W1995661738 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W1997714051 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2022401732 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2037859676 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2043884036 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2056176297 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2056698510 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2068433921 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2107130022 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2110526649 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2111722073 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2122473406 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2134807869 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2136608905 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2161466446 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2169205464 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2509826262 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2523328169 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2560393808 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2588443021 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2612630960 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2623779865 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2761423999 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2765304416 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2784186660 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2804380175 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2808528215 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2843010082 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2883096944 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2889335577 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2889463378 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2895995041 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2898910479 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2899754802 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2901869712 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2902116953 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2922711788 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2931716593 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2932047266 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2934309502 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2936963034 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2937215033 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2939330599 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2953532875 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2961793453 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2969756003 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2972203331 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2973004460 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2987917655 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W2990464492 @default.
• W3028484854 cites W3014634077 @default.
• W3028484854 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/20346" @default.
• W3028484854 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7644372" @default.
• W3028484854 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33090118" @default.
• W3028484854 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3028484854 type Work @default.
• W3028484854 sameAs 3028484854 @default.
• W3028484854 citedByCount "152" @default.
• W3028484854 countsByYear W30284848542021 @default.
• W3028484854 countsByYear W30284848542022 @default.
• W3028484854 countsByYear W30284848542023 @default.
• W3028484854 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5016763292 @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5022362845 @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5027399159 @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5046353834 @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5060629377 @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5068314952 @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5070253070 @default.
• W3028484854 hasAuthorship W3028484854A5081487022 @default.
• W3028484854 hasBestOaLocation W30284848541 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C173853756 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C190954187 @default.
• W3028484854 hasConcept C199539241 @default.

• next