Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3028616641> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W3028616641 endingPage "680" @default.
- W3028616641 startingPage "676" @default.
- W3028616641 abstract "ObjectiveTo compare the effects of positioning robustness on dose distribution between intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck tumor, and to evaluate their needs for image-based guidance.MethodsThirty patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing IMRT were enrolled as subjects. The VMAT plans were designed according to the clinical dosimetric requirements and the dose calculation was made by the AAA method. For the two plans in each patient, the isocenters were shifted by ±1.0, ±3.0, and ±5.0 mm along the original x, y, and z axes to simulate the impacts of positioning errors in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively, on dose distribution. The dose-volume histogram parameters were analyzed in 60 references and 1080 re-calculated plans. Comparison was made by paired t-test.ResultsWhen the error was 1 mm, the average deviations of gross tumor volume (GTV) D98, clinical target volume (CTV) D95 and heterogeneity index, and planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) V95 were<0.5%. When the error was 3 mm, the average dose deviations of GTV and CTV were<1.0% and significantly larger in VMAT than in IMRT; the average dose deviation of PGTV was large (GTV D98, P=0.00; CTV D95, P=0.00); the average deviations of PGTVnx V95 and PGTVnd V95 were significantly smaller in IMRT than in VMAT (1.64% vs. 1.95%, P=0.01; 1.73% vs. 2.63%, P=0.00). The deviations of parameters became larger with the increasing positioning error and were significantly larger in VMAT than in IMRT (GTV D98, P=0.00; CTV D95, P=0.00; CTV HI; P=0.00; PGTV V95; P=0.01). Compared with the target volume, Dmax to the spinal cord and brain stem had larger deviations. However, there were no significant differences in Dmax to the spinal cord and brain stem between IMRT and VMAT.ConclusionsThe IMRT and VMAT plans are both robust when the positioning error is small (<3 mm). Compared with IMRT, VAMT is more sensitive to the positioning error, mainly in the target volume. The difference between the two plans becomes larger with the increasing positioning error. An increase in the frequency of image-based guidance is recommended for patients undergoing VMAT.Key words: Positioning robustness; Intedsity-modulated radiotherapy; Volumetric modulated arc therapy; Dosimetry" @default.
- W3028616641 created "2020-06-05" @default.
- W3028616641 creator A5010326436 @default.
- W3028616641 creator A5015485511 @default.
- W3028616641 creator A5017565357 @default.
- W3028616641 date "2016-07-15" @default.
- W3028616641 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W3028616641 title "Effects of positioning robustness on dosimetry for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy" @default.
- W3028616641 doi "https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2016.07.003" @default.
- W3028616641 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W3028616641 type Work @default.
- W3028616641 sameAs 3028616641 @default.
- W3028616641 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3028616641 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3028616641 hasAuthorship W3028616641A5010326436 @default.
- W3028616641 hasAuthorship W3028616641A5015485511 @default.
- W3028616641 hasAuthorship W3028616641A5017565357 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C2780198649 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C105795698 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C126838900 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C201645570 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C22679943 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C2780198649 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C2989005 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C33923547 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C509974204 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C71924100 @default.
- W3028616641 hasConceptScore W3028616641C75088862 @default.
- W3028616641 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W3028616641 hasLocation W30286166411 @default.
- W3028616641 hasOpenAccess W3028616641 @default.
- W3028616641 hasPrimaryLocation W30286166411 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W1860067247 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W1976463290 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W1982628688 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W1982982161 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W1984678504 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W1985984122 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2004735293 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2010283913 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2013768858 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2077704199 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2084302898 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2268644431 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2472164978 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2472555529 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2548711712 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W2987372469 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W3032692867 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W3092711802 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W948307439 @default.
- W3028616641 hasRelatedWork W984438949 @default.
- W3028616641 hasVolume "25" @default.
- W3028616641 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3028616641 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3028616641 magId "3028616641" @default.
- W3028616641 workType "article" @default.