Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3028673208> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3028673208 endingPage "535" @default.
- W3028673208 startingPage "527" @default.
- W3028673208 abstract "How systematic review authors address missing data among eligible primary studies remains uncertain.To assess whether systematic review authors are consistent in the way they handle missing data, both across trials included in the same meta-analysis, and with their reported methods.We first identified 100 eligible systematic reviews that included a statistically significant meta-analysis of a patient-important dichotomous efficacy outcome. Then, we successfully retrieved 638 of the 653 trials included in these systematic reviews' meta-analyses. From each trial report, we extracted statistical data used in the analysis of the outcome of interest to compare with the data used in the meta-analysis. First, we used these comparisons to classify the analytical method actually used for handling missing data by the systematic review authors for each included trial. Second, we assessed whether systematic reviews explicitly reported their analytical method of handling missing data. Third, we calculated the proportion of systematic reviews that were consistent in their analytical method actually used across trials included in the same meta-analysis. Fourth, among systematic reviews that were consistent in the analytical method actually used across trials and explicitly reported on a method for handling missing data, we assessed whether the analytical method actually used and the reported methods were consistent.We were unable to determine the analytical method reviews actually used for handling missing outcome data among 397 trials. Among the remaining 241, systematic review authors most commonly conducted complete case analysis (n=128, 53%) or assumed none of the participants with missing data had the event of interest (n=58, 24%). Only eight of 100 systematic reviews were consistent in their approach to handling missing data across included trials, but none of these reported methods for handling missing data. Among seven reviews that did explicitly report their analytical method of handling missing data, only one was consistent in their approach across included trials (using complete case analysis), and their approach was inconsistent with their reported methods (assumed all participants with missing data had the event).The majority of systematic review authors were inconsistent in their approach towards reporting and handling missing outcome data across eligible primary trials, and most did not explicitly report their methods to handle missing data. Systematic review authors should clearly identify missing outcome data among their eligible trials, specify an approach for handling missing data in their analyses, and apply their approach consistently across all primary trials." @default.
- W3028673208 created "2020-06-05" @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5011665522 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5013491140 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5013667470 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5020341898 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5020862497 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5024948628 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5026942372 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5031717153 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5032397387 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5038506317 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5041615321 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5050066824 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5067205817 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5070327169 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5072861069 @default.
- W3028673208 creator A5084495124 @default.
- W3028673208 date "2020-05-01" @default.
- W3028673208 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W3028673208 title "<p>Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey</p>" @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1257307100 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1744788682 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1976568348 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1981210131 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1981680557 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1988301094 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1989844406 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W1991556223 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2032160051 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2061410297 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2076828944 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2083815143 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2085508623 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2108709318 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2109318634 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2115176304 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2117776447 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2131726718 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2136991564 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2164624078 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2166887354 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2167225742 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2258698375 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2267019052 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2279032135 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2288516595 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2410591240 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2521413662 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2604779588 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2615921597 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2759741092 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2792220848 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2794756688 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2895487096 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2945881465 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2947151211 @default.
- W3028673208 cites W2959374711 @default.
- W3028673208 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s242080" @default.
- W3028673208 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7266325" @default.
- W3028673208 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32547244" @default.
- W3028673208 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3028673208 type Work @default.
- W3028673208 sameAs 3028673208 @default.
- W3028673208 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W3028673208 countsByYear W30286732082021 @default.
- W3028673208 countsByYear W30286732082023 @default.
- W3028673208 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5011665522 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5013491140 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5013667470 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5020341898 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5020862497 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5024948628 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5026942372 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5031717153 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5032397387 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5038506317 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5041615321 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5050066824 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5067205817 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5070327169 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5072861069 @default.
- W3028673208 hasAuthorship W3028673208A5084495124 @default.
- W3028673208 hasBestOaLocation W30286732081 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C9357733 @default.
- W3028673208 hasConcept C95190672 @default.