FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3029120967> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3029120967 endingPage "1255" @default.
• W3029120967 startingPage "1252" @default.
• W3029120967 abstract "ObjectiveDiscuss the effect of different shaping methods in fixing of butterfly uninjured needle in venous port.MethodsA total of 241 breast cancer patients using port for chemotherapy were selecteel as the study objects. Subjects were randomly divided into group A and group B according to the hospital. There were 120 patients in group A and 121 patients in group B, respectively, and group crossover design was adopted. Group A first adopted the traditional shape fixed method for butterfly uninjured needle in port, while next time modified shape fixed method was adopted to fix butterfly uninjured needle in port. And group B patients taking method was just the opposite. Main observation indexes included: the refixed rate of butterfly uninjured needle, accident take off rate of butterfly uninjured needle, comfortable degree of patients.ResultsThere was statistically significant difference between the two groups in the refixed rate for butterfly uninjured needle at the first stage, and the number of refixed in group A was 24, while the number of refixing in group B was 8 (χ2 =9.379, P < 0.01). There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in the refixed rate for butterfly uninjured needle at the second stage, and the number of refixed in group A was 9, while the number of refixing in group B was 27 (χ2=10.406, P <0.01). There was statistically significant difference respectively between two stages in group A and group B about the number of refixed for butterfly uninjured needle. There was statistically significant difference respectively between two stages in group A and group B about the number of refixed for butterfly uninjured needle (χ2=7.905, 12.058, P < 0.01), and modified shape fixed method group was lower than the traditional shape fixed method group .There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in the accident take off rate of butterfly uninjured needle, and the rate in two groups was 0. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in the scores of comfortable degree at the first stage (t=13.014, P < 0.01), and scores was (3.462±1.067), (5.657±1.514) respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in the scores of comfortable degree at the second stage (t=15.476, P < 0.01), and scores was (6.291±1.494), (3.902±0.795) respectively. There was statistically significant difference respectively between two stages in group A and group B about the scores of comfortable degree (P < 0.05).ConclusionsModified shape fixed method used in fixing butterfly uninjured needle can reduce the refixed rate, and increase patients comfortable degree.Key words: Breast cancer; Venous port; Butterfly uninjured needle; Fix; Shaping" @default.
• W3029120967 created "2020-06-05" @default.
• W3029120967 creator A5059365254 @default.
• W3029120967 creator A5087669313 @default.
• W3029120967 date "2016-06-01" @default.
• W3029120967 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3029120967 title "Application of different shaping methods in fixing of butterfly uninjured needle in venous port" @default.
• W3029120967 doi "https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2016.16.014" @default.
• W3029120967 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W3029120967 type Work @default.
• W3029120967 sameAs 3029120967 @default.
• W3029120967 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3029120967 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3029120967 hasAuthorship W3029120967A5059365254 @default.
• W3029120967 hasAuthorship W3029120967A5087669313 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C2778605236 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C126322002 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C141071460 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C146357865 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C151730666 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C18903297 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C2778605236 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C3018023364 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C71924100 @default.
• W3029120967 hasConceptScore W3029120967C86803240 @default.
• W3029120967 hasIssue "16" @default.
• W3029120967 hasLocation W30291209671 @default.
• W3029120967 hasOpenAccess W3029120967 @default.
• W3029120967 hasPrimaryLocation W30291209671 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W1969248501 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W1983172432 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2026593489 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2361884789 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2380687458 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2385900451 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2391770730 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2394217359 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2398137760 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W2511162544 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W3028858116 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W3029395679 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W3030563954 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W3031256496 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W3032339604 @default.
• W3029120967 hasRelatedWork W3136597449 @default.
• W3029120967 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W3029120967 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3029120967 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3029120967 magId "3029120967" @default.
• W3029120967 workType "article" @default.