FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3030101780> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3030101780 endingPage "232596712092257" @default.
• W3030101780 startingPage "232596712092257" @default.
• W3030101780 abstract "Primary shoulder stabilization is successful, but there continues to be a risk of recurrence after operative repair, particularly in the young athlete. It is important for surgeons to understand the outcomes after various revision stabilization techniques to best counsel patients and manage expectations.To analyze recurrent instability and revision surgery rates in patients who underwent revision anterior glenohumeral stabilization procedures with either arthroscopic repair, open repair, coracoid transfer, free bone block, or capsular reconstruction.Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.We performed a systematic review of level 2 to 4 evidence studies using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Clinical studies of revision anterior glenohumeral stabilization (arthroscopic repair, open repair, coracoid transfer, free bone block, or capsular reconstruction) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were analyzed. The rate of recurrent instability, rate of revision surgery, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion were extracted and reported. Study methodological quality was evaluated using the Downs and Black quality assessment score.A total of 37 studies met inclusion criteria and were available for analysis: 20 studies evaluated arthroscopic repair, 8 evaluated open repair, 5 evaluated Latarjet procedure, 3 evaluated bone block, and 2 evaluated capsular reconstruction. There was 1 study included in both arthroscopic and Latarjet procedures, for a total of 1110 revision cases. There was 1 level 2 study, and the remainder were level 3 or 4 with poor Downs and Black scores. Participants analyzed were most commonly young (weighted mean age, 26.1 years) and male (78.4%). The weighted mean clinical follow-up after revision surgery was 47.8 months. The weighted mean rate of recurrent instability was 3.8% (n = 245) after the Latarjet procedure, 13.4% (n = 260) after open repair, 16.0% (n = 531) after arthroscopic repair, 20.8% (n = 72) after bone block, and 31.0% (n = 35) after capsular reconstruction. The weighted mean rate of additional revision surgery was 0.0% after bone block, 0.02% after the Latarjet procedure, 9.0% after arthroscopic repair, 9.3% after open repair, and 22.8% after capsular reconstruction. Patient-reported outcomes and objective measures of range of motion and strength improved with all revision techniques.The current review identifies a deficiency in the literature pertaining to consistent meaningful outcomes and the effect of bone loss after revision shoulder stabilization. Published studies demonstrate, however, that revision shoulder stabilization using arthroscopic, open, coracoid transfer, or bone block techniques yielded satisfactory objective and patient-reported outcomes. The Latarjet procedure exhibited the lowest recurrent instability rate. This study confirms that recurrent instability remains a common problem, despite revision shoulder stabilization. The quality of research in revision shoulder stabilization remains poor, and higher quality studies are needed to establish best practices for treatment of this complex problem." @default.
• W3030101780 created "2020-06-05" @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5008547285 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5008760758 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5009334663 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5014764476 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5030835139 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5038488725 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5042855170 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5048158101 @default.
• W3030101780 creator A5056960926 @default.
• W3030101780 date "2020-05-01" @default.
• W3030101780 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3030101780 title "Outcomes After Revision Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1814784336 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1919654699 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1969370755 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1972191805 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1978367590 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1989833599 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1993954043 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W1997391892 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2000428822 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2003744793 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2004683474 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2014472662 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2015492015 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2029968979 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2030068359 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2032194199 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2037518920 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2048075259 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2050258501 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2057728533 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2058140724 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2060846458 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2073902299 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2087377818 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2091406266 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2097611152 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2100514156 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2101551176 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2101603428 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2105615070 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2114488753 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2117830631 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2122685145 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2137334374 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2140032313 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2148079220 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2161374186 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2164010508 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2168226052 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2243207040 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2328847594 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2342590541 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2488824485 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2525508529 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2554702146 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2564649146 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2726103166 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2785867647 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2887740911 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W2889037203 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W3043537159 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W3090541375 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W4243961153 @default.
• W3030101780 cites W4366657988 @default.
• W3030101780 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120922571" @default.
• W3030101780 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7263126" @default.
• W3030101780 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32528993" @default.
• W3030101780 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3030101780 type Work @default.
• W3030101780 sameAs 3030101780 @default.
• W3030101780 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3030101780 countsByYear W30301017802021 @default.
• W3030101780 countsByYear W30301017802022 @default.
• W3030101780 countsByYear W30301017802023 @default.
• W3030101780 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5008547285 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5008760758 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5009334663 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5014764476 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5030835139 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5038488725 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5042855170 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5048158101 @default.
• W3030101780 hasAuthorship W3030101780A5056960926 @default.
• W3030101780 hasBestOaLocation W30301017801 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C126249036 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3030101780 hasConcept C2777307732 @default.

• next