FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3031263519> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3031263519 endingPage "278" @default.
• W3031263519 startingPage "273" @default.
• W3031263519 abstract "ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of tube voltage and iodine concentration of contrast medium (CM) on abdominal dynamic enhanced CT image quality.MethodsSix miniature pigs underwent repeated upper abdomen dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scans in 4 scanning protocols with different concentration of CM and tube voltage, namely, protocol 1, CM with iodine concentration of 270 milligrams iodine per milliliter (mg/ml) and 80 kV tube voltage; protocol 2, 270 mg/ml and 120 kV; protocol 3, 370 mg/ml and 80 kV and protocol 4, 370 mg/ml and 120 kV. The same iodine dose (600 mg/ml) and iodine delivery rate (IDR) (920 mg/s) were used in all protocols. The CM with iodine concentration of 270 mg/ml were injected at a flow rate of 3.4 ml/s, and 370 mg/ml CM injected at 2.5 ml/s. Image reconstruction was performed with iterative reconstruction (iDose4) in protocol 1 and 3,filtered back projection (FBP) was used in protocol 2 and 4. A subjective scoring system for image quality, image noise and sharpness was conducted by 2 radiologists independently. The measured values (peak of enhanced CT values, image noise of aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein, hepatic vein and liver parenchyma) as well as the calculated values [their time-to-peak, signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios] were compared between among 4 protocols. The CT volume dose index (CDTIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded from the CT console after each scanning. Factorial designed ANOVA was used for comparison of enhanced CT values of vessels and liver parenchyma, noise, SNR and CNR. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison of values among the 4 protocols, including the time-to-peak enhancement of vessels and liver parenchyma, the subjective scores of image quality indices.ResultThere was no significant differences in subjective scores of the image quality, image noise and image sharpness (P>0.05). The scored were more than 3, and the images with 4 scanning protocols were all acceptable for diagnosis. There was no significant differences between protocol 1 and 3, protocol 2 and 4 in the peak enhancement CT values of aorta [(729±46) HU vs.(707±59)HU,(515±84)HU vs. (513±53)HU], inferior vena cava [(366±95)HU vs. (368±92)HU, (282±39)HU vs. (262 ± 67)HU], portal vein [(213 ± 18)HU vs.(201 ± 29)HU, (180 ± 21)HU vs. (176 ± 27)HU], hepatic vein[(207±18)HU vs. (193±10)HU, (179±24)HU vs. (170±14)HU] and liver parenchyma [(128±7) HU vs. (127±4) HU,(135±5)HU vs.(135±6)HU] (P>0.05). But the CT values of vessels (aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein and hepatic vein) in protocol 1 and 3 were significantly higher than those in protocol 2 and 4 (P 0.05). No significant differences were observed on the peak times, SNR and CNR in aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein, hepatic vein and liver parenchyma among 4 protocols (P>0.05). The CDTIvol and DLP! were 199.67 mGy, 1 597.4 mGy·cm respectively in protocol 1 and 3,585.12 mGy and 4 680.9 mGy·cm in protocol 2 and 4 (scanning with 120 kV).ConclusionsCM with different iodinated concentration could achieve the same enhancement in the abdominal vessels and liver parenchyma by using the proper scan protocols, which have the same IDR and iodine dose per kilogram body weight.Higher vessel enhanced peak values were achieved when using the protocols with 80 kV tube voltage than 120 kV. By using a low dose protocol of 80 kV tube voltage with the iterative reconstruction algorithm, the quality of image can be warranted.Key words: Tomography, X-ray computed; Contrast media; Radiation dosage" @default.
• W3031263519 created "2020-06-05" @default.
• W3031263519 creator A5000745340 @default.
• W3031263519 creator A5026096050 @default.
• W3031263519 creator A5040083279 @default.
• W3031263519 creator A5069853343 @default.
• W3031263519 creator A5081917774 @default.
• W3031263519 date "2015-04-10" @default.
• W3031263519 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3031263519 title "Evaluation of contrast enhancement and image quality:a comparison between different tube voltages and iodine concentrations in abdominal dynamic CT scans in minipigs" @default.
• W3031263519 doi "https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2015.04.009" @default.
• W3031263519 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W3031263519 type Work @default.
• W3031263519 sameAs 3031263519 @default.
• W3031263519 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3031263519 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3031263519 hasAuthorship W3031263519A5000745340 @default.
• W3031263519 hasAuthorship W3031263519A5026096050 @default.
• W3031263519 hasAuthorship W3031263519A5040083279 @default.
• W3031263519 hasAuthorship W3031263519A5069853343 @default.
• W3031263519 hasAuthorship W3031263519A5081917774 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C2779980429 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C2780520971 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C2992612897 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C35772409 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C539932907 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C115961682 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C126838900 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C136229726 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C141071460 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C154945302 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C191897082 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C192562407 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C2779980429 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C2780520971 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C2989005 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C2992612897 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C35772409 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C41008148 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C539932907 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C55020928 @default.
• W3031263519 hasConceptScore W3031263519C71924100 @default.
• W3031263519 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3031263519 hasLocation W30312635191 @default.
• W3031263519 hasOpenAccess W3031263519 @default.
• W3031263519 hasPrimaryLocation W30312635191 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W1969516989 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W1998957699 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2090065835 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2321465907 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2355112159 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2356778731 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2363245958 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2363454583 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2364173319 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2387428587 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2507503132 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2804142653 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W2914697731 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W3028601598 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W3030386123 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W3031538645 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W3031790563 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W3032193964 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W3032377137 @default.
• W3031263519 hasRelatedWork W3157060439 @default.
• W3031263519 hasVolume "49" @default.
• W3031263519 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3031263519 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3031263519 magId "3031263519" @default.
• W3031263519 workType "article" @default.