Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3031377587> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W3031377587 endingPage "1166" @default.
- W3031377587 startingPage "1164" @default.
- W3031377587 abstract "Objective To compare the effect of high negative pressure drainage system and the traditional suction drainage system applied in thyroid surgery.Methods Eligible patients were selected randomly and divided into high negative pressure drainage group(30 cases) and traditional suction drainage group(30 cases).The draining rate within 24 hours after operation,delayed extubation rate,postoperative bleeding,rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve Injury,postoperative infection rate,degree of extubation pain and the incidence of severe pain of both groups were observed and difference of incidence of incision adhesions 1 month after operation were observed.Results The average drainage within 24 hours after operation in experimental group was (19.00 ± 6.79) ml,while (28.53 ± 14.74) ml in control group (P ＜ 0.05).Delayed extubation rate in experimental group was 3.33 ％,while 26.67％ in control group (x2 =4.71,P ＜ 0.05).Incidence of hematoma and bleeding after operation in experimental group was 0％,while 10％ in control group(x2 =1.40,P ＞ 0.05).No recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was found in either group,Incidence was 0％.The incidence of infection in experimental group was 0％,while 10％ in control group (x2 =1.40,P ＞0.05).The incidence of severe pain when extubation in experimental group was 0％,while 100％ in control group (x2 =60.00,P ＜ 0.05).Incidence of incision adhesions in experimental group was 0.33 ％,while 30％ in control group (x2 =6.14,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Draining rate,delayed extubation rate and incidence of incision adhesions could be reduced with high negative pressure drainage system applied in thyroid surgery,which is worthy of clinical.Key words: Thyroid surgery; High negative pressure; Traditional suction drainage system" @default.
- W3031377587 created "2020-06-05" @default.
- W3031377587 creator A5004553785 @default.
- W3031377587 creator A5067471098 @default.
- W3031377587 creator A5068732609 @default.
- W3031377587 date "2013-04-15" @default.
- W3031377587 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
- W3031377587 title "Comparison of the effect between high negative pressure drainage system and the traditional suction drainage system applied in thyroid surgery" @default.
- W3031377587 doi "https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2013.08.018" @default.
- W3031377587 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W3031377587 type Work @default.
- W3031377587 sameAs 3031377587 @default.
- W3031377587 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3031377587 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3031377587 hasAuthorship W3031377587A5004553785 @default.
- W3031377587 hasAuthorship W3031377587A5067471098 @default.
- W3031377587 hasAuthorship W3031377587A5068732609 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C23795335 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C2779662492 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C526584372 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C67592535 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C120665830 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C121332964 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C126322002 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C127413603 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C141071460 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C18903297 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C23795335 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C2779662492 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C42219234 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C526584372 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C61511704 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C67592535 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C71924100 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C78519656 @default.
- W3031377587 hasConceptScore W3031377587C86803240 @default.
- W3031377587 hasIssue "08" @default.
- W3031377587 hasLocation W30313775871 @default.
- W3031377587 hasOpenAccess W3031377587 @default.
- W3031377587 hasPrimaryLocation W30313775871 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2347708273 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2349411532 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2352785257 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2362352057 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2369264120 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2379360120 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2387038072 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2387393236 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2392176193 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2411599273 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2988688827 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2996530631 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W3029291076 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W3029352862 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W3029971396 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W3031071629 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W3031990055 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W3082663281 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2152868437 @default.
- W3031377587 hasRelatedWork W2345963534 @default.
- W3031377587 hasVolume "20" @default.
- W3031377587 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3031377587 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3031377587 magId "3031377587" @default.
- W3031377587 workType "article" @default.