Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3032172105> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W3032172105 endingPage "869" @default.
- W3032172105 startingPage "865" @default.
- W3032172105 abstract "ObjectiveTo evaluate the current status of medical students' documentation of patient medical records and to investigate their feedback of the assessment.MethodsThe subjective-objective-assessment-plan (SOAP) notes are documented by 41 students of grade 2012 in grade five of 8-year clmical medicine major of Peking University Health Science Center, who were rotating in pediatric department were checked by two teachers. Students were required to complete the SOAP note within 30 minutes of a real patient. The completeness, appropriateness, and accuracy of SOAP notes were also analyzed. Reliability was checked by Cronbach's α score. A questionnaire was conduted to collect feedback from students.ResultsNo documentation of patients' names and date was observed in 48.8% and 53.7% of the 41 SOAP notes reviewed. Forty students described all four parts of the notes except that one student didn't fill any content in part four (plan). The ratio of average score to total score of subjective, objective, assessment and plan was 6.80, 5.69, 3.35, 3.92, respectively. It was worth noting that in the self-perception part of feedback, the total score (23.30±2.71) of those who feel unsatisfied with their performances was higher than that (21.56±2.18) of the satisfied ones. The difference was statistically significant (t=2.133, P=0.039). Furthermore, the rank of SOAP was highly related to the ranks of other forms of exams.ConclusionsThe most significant problems with completeness were the omission of patients' names and date. The items that need to be improved in SOAP writing are basic information and important negative medical history, symptoms, and meaningful sub-items for differential diagnosis.Key words: Medical records; Medical students; Pediatrics; Application; Assessment" @default.
- W3032172105 created "2020-06-05" @default.
- W3032172105 creator A5037803989 @default.
- W3032172105 creator A5041430390 @default.
- W3032172105 creator A5042118056 @default.
- W3032172105 creator A5051836464 @default.
- W3032172105 creator A5062587436 @default.
- W3032172105 date "2020-12-09" @default.
- W3032172105 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3032172105 title "“主观—客观—评估—计划”格式病历书写在儿科学见习中的应用与评价" @default.
- W3032172105 doi "https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677x.2018.06.015" @default.
- W3032172105 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3032172105 type Work @default.
- W3032172105 sameAs 3032172105 @default.
- W3032172105 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3032172105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3032172105 hasAuthorship W3032172105A5037803989 @default.
- W3032172105 hasAuthorship W3032172105A5041430390 @default.
- W3032172105 hasAuthorship W3032172105A5042118056 @default.
- W3032172105 hasAuthorship W3032172105A5051836464 @default.
- W3032172105 hasAuthorship W3032172105A5062587436 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C106906290 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C126322002 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C15744967 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C171606756 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C199360897 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C3018023364 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C41008148 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C509550671 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C512399662 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C56666940 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C70410870 @default.
- W3032172105 hasConceptScore W3032172105C71924100 @default.
- W3032172105 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W3032172105 hasLocation W30321721051 @default.
- W3032172105 hasOpenAccess W3032172105 @default.
- W3032172105 hasPrimaryLocation W30321721051 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W146957590 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W1869563289 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W204801645 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2061849691 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2069681824 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2126235084 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2170281123 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2186024363 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2345826357 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2591230691 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3028746729 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3028748124 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3028835257 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3028874145 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3028902892 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3029043378 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3029942353 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W3202589591 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2186827154 @default.
- W3032172105 hasRelatedWork W2267235241 @default.
- W3032172105 hasVolume "38" @default.
- W3032172105 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3032172105 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3032172105 magId "3032172105" @default.
- W3032172105 workType "article" @default.