FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3032814356> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3032814356 endingPage "102" @default.
• W3032814356 startingPage "98" @default.
• W3032814356 abstract "ObjectiveBy contrastive analysis of different treponema pallidum (TP) detection schemes between blood services and medical institutions, to explore the best TP screening and diagnosis schemes, so as to guide the clinical diagnosis and unpaid blood donation and TP screening before marriage.MethodsFrom May 2013 to December 2014, a total of 22 471 cases of patients receiving TP screening in Dongying District People's Hospital of Dongying, Shandong Province, as medical institution group (n=22 471) and from January 2013 to December 2014, a total of 26 148 cases of blood donors in Dongying Central Blood Station, as blood service group (n=26 148) were included into this study. In Dongying Central Blood Station, two kinds of TP-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from different manufacturers and toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST) kit were used to detect these donors' TP, respectively. The donors whose TP-ELISA or TRUST detection results were positive were required to be retested by TP particle agglutination (TPPA) test. In Dongying District People's Hospital of Dongying, TP-ELISA was used to detect patients who wanted to receive TP screening at first. And the patients whose TP-ELISA detection results were positive were required to be retested by TRUST and TPPA test. The two TP detection schemes were analyzed by statistical methods. In addition, an example in Dongying District People's Hospital of Dongying was introduced to explain the disadvantages of only detecting TP nonspecific antibody before marriage in family planning services. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Dongying District People's Hospital of Dongying and Dongying Central Blood Station. All donors were confirmed by the Requirements of Donor Health Examination (GB18467-2011). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. There were no significant differences about age and gender composition between two groups (P>0.05).Results①Among 22 471 cases of patients in medical institution group, a total of 315 cases were TP-ELISA positive, accounting for 1.40% which was obviously higher than that of blood service group (108/26 148, 0.41%), and the difference was statistically different (χ2=234, P<0.05). While the TRUST and TPPA positive rates of medical institution group were both obviously lower than those of blood service group (0.03% vs 0.23%, 0.04% vs 0.23%), and the differences were statistically different (χ2=35, 64; P<0.05). ② In blood service group, a total of 108 cases were TP-ELISA positive, 61 cases were TRUST positive and 63 cases were TPPA positive, 32 cases were all TP-ELISA, TRUST and TPPA positive, 62 cases were both TP-ELISA and TPPA positive, 33 cases were both TRUST and TPPA positive, one case were TP-ELISA negative but TRUST and TPPA positive. ③ In a family planning service department, only TP nonspecific antibody screening was carried out for premarital TP screening. So one case of pregnant woman's TP nonspecific antibody screening results were negative before marriage while TP specific antibody test results were positive after marriage, and thus leading to breakdown of marriage.ConclusionsDifferent services should adopt different TP detection schemes. The main purpose of medical institutions is diagnosis and treatment, and the blood services aim at ensuring the blood quality, the current detection scheme is the best, that is the combination of TP specific antibody and nonspecific antibody detection scheme is the best. Family planning service departments do not pay so much attention to TP detection, and just take TP nonspecific antibody screening.Key words: Medical institutions; Blood services; Treponema pallidum detection scheme; Residual unpaid blood donation; Premarital screening" @default.
• W3032814356 created "2020-06-05" @default.
• W3032814356 creator A5000401562 @default.
• W3032814356 creator A5010921118 @default.
• W3032814356 creator A5032509645 @default.
• W3032814356 creator A5056101043 @default.
• W3032814356 date "2015-03-20" @default.
• W3032814356 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3032814356 title "Contrastive analysis of different treponema pallidum detection schemes between medical institutions and blood services in Dongying City, Shandong Province" @default.
• W3032814356 doi "https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-419x.2015.02.002" @default.
• W3032814356 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W3032814356 type Work @default.
• W3032814356 sameAs 3032814356 @default.
• W3032814356 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3032814356 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3032814356 hasAuthorship W3032814356A5000401562 @default.
• W3032814356 hasAuthorship W3032814356A5010921118 @default.
• W3032814356 hasAuthorship W3032814356A5032509645 @default.
• W3032814356 hasAuthorship W3032814356A5056101043 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C159654299 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C2776983459 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C2780187896 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C2993617979 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C3013748606 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C45189115 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConcept C73878171 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C126322002 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C159654299 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C203014093 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C2776983459 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C2780187896 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C2993617979 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C3013748606 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C45189115 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C512399662 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C71924100 @default.
• W3032814356 hasConceptScore W3032814356C73878171 @default.
• W3032814356 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3032814356 hasLocation W30328143561 @default.
• W3032814356 hasOpenAccess W3032814356 @default.
• W3032814356 hasPrimaryLocation W30328143561 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W1999613953 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2277206835 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2332802904 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2347367951 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2351928805 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2363259996 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2364019881 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2364434930 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2364567168 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2368360969 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2372049063 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2378765850 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2380148530 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2381867604 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2383758600 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2389180128 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2391207992 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2392036587 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2392439296 @default.
• W3032814356 hasRelatedWork W2756089982 @default.
• W3032814356 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W3032814356 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3032814356 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3032814356 magId "3032814356" @default.
• W3032814356 workType "article" @default.