FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3032820993> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3032820993 endingPage "44" @default.
• W3032820993 startingPage "34" @default.
• W3032820993 abstract "Abstract Background Prosthetic breast reconstruction has been gaining popularity and a variety of implant options are currently available. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the safety and efficacy of newly developed shaped implants compared with those of conventional round implants. To date, few studies have investigated the outcomes of breast reconstruction with shaped versus round implants. Objectives The present study aimed to comprehensively compare, via meta-analytic methodology, shaped and round breast implant reconstruction in terms of complication profiles and aesthetic satisfaction. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies presenting the complication rates for shaped and round implant groups. The relative risks of the following complications between the groups were calculated: infection, seroma, capsular contracture, rupture, rippling, reconstruction failure, and implant exchange or removal. Outcomes of aesthetic satisfaction included aesthetic results and patient-reported outcomes. Results Meta-analysis of 8 retrospective cohort studies, representing 2490 cases of implant-based breast reconstruction, was performed. There were no significant differences in the risks of infection, seroma, capsular contracture, and reconstruction failure between the 2 groups. The risks of implant rupture and rippling were significantly reduced with shaped implants. In a subgroup analysis of shaped/textured and round/smooth implants, the risk of infection was significantly enhanced in the former, whereas incidences of other complications, including capsular contracture and reconstruction failure, were similar. Aesthetic satisfaction analysis of the 2 groups demonstrated similar outcome scores with favorable overall results. Conclusions Our results suggest that both shaped and round implants might provide favorable breast reconstruction outcomes with similarly low complication rates and aesthetic results. Level of Evidence: 4" @default.
• W3032820993 created "2020-06-05" @default.
• W3032820993 creator A5012593655 @default.
• W3032820993 creator A5079514839 @default.
• W3032820993 creator A5080007765 @default.
• W3032820993 date "2020-05-25" @default.
• W3032820993 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3032820993 title "Comprehensive Comparison Between Shaped Versus Round Implants for Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W3032820993 cites W1019350574 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W1759788859 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W1970225199 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W1971226776 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W1979423827 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W1987365087 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W1993959464 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2001136631 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2002009301 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2007104994 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2010479705 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2017057316 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2017922564 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2048315973 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2048904093 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2050657547 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2054234212 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2067722551 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2072005917 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2076794765 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2083141852 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2084924898 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2089512106 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2106630810 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2230565492 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2313591387 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2313661281 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2319677873 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2321114481 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2321300087 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2325617828 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2326091359 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2332098367 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2409829264 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2487366390 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2564892039 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2607848457 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2766993364 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2775603076 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2922213909 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W2964369635 @default.
• W3032820993 cites W4247392957 @default.
• W3032820993 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa128" @default.
• W3032820993 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32449906" @default.
• W3032820993 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3032820993 type Work @default.
• W3032820993 sameAs 3032820993 @default.
• W3032820993 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3032820993 countsByYear W30328209932021 @default.
• W3032820993 countsByYear W30328209932022 @default.
• W3032820993 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3032820993 hasAuthorship W3032820993A5012593655 @default.
• W3032820993 hasAuthorship W3032820993A5079514839 @default.
• W3032820993 hasAuthorship W3032820993A5080007765 @default.
• W3032820993 hasBestOaLocation W30328209931 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2775951664 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2778187792 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2778614594 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2779409168 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2781001896 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2781037480 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C121608353 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C126322002 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C141071460 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C187960798 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C199343813 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2775944032 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2775951664 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2778187792 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2778614594 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2779409168 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2781001896 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2781037480 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C2781411149 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C530470458 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C71924100 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C81182388 @default.
• W3032820993 hasConceptScore W3032820993C95190672 @default.
• W3032820993 hasIssue "1" @default.

• next