FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3033353695> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3033353695 endingPage "AB550" @default.
• W3033353695 startingPage "AB549" @default.
• W3033353695 abstract "Forceps polypectomy of non-diminutive colorectal polyps is associated with higher rates of incomplete polyp resection compared to snare polypectomy, and for this reason the ESGE and others recommend snare polypectomy for non-diminutive polyps. However, there are a paucity of data on the rate of inappropriate use of forceps for polypectomy, and no data on efforts to improve this rate. We sought to quantify the incidence and predictors of inappropriate forceps use and to measure the effect of a quality improvement initiative to encourage snare polypectomy for non-diminutive polyps. We performed a retrospective study of all colonoscopies with polypectomies performed at two U.S. health systems (an academic tertiary care hospital and safety-net health system) between 10/1/2017 and 9/30/2019. The primary outcome was colonoscopies with an inappropriate forceps polypectomy, i.e. use of forceps polypectomy for any polyp ≥5mm. We measured the prevalence of inappropriate forceps polypectomy and used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with inappropriate forceps polypectomy. We examined the effect of a quality improvement initiative, implemented 11/15/2019, in which avoidance of inappropriate forceps polypectomy was included as a quality metric tied to a modest financial incentive for the gastroenterology division. We identified 10118 colonoscopies with polypectomies. Overall, 1940 (18.9%) included inappropriate forceps polypectomy, including 20.8% of colonoscopies at the tertiary care hospital and 18.5% at the safety-net health system. Implementation of the quality improvement initiative was associated with a reduction in inappropriate forceps polypectomy (27.0% vs. 14.7%; OR 0.45, 95%CI 0.40 – 0.51) in adjusted analysis (Figure 1). In multivariate analysis, an adequate bowel preparation (OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66 – 0.91) and fellow involvement in the procedure (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.55 – 0.71) were associated with decreased odds of inappropriate forceps polypectomy, while number of polyps (OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.98 – 2.60 for 3-9 polyps; OR 4.65, 95%CI 3.57 – 6.05 for 10 or more polyps) and polyps in the right and left colon (OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.23 – 1.69) were associated with increased inappropriate forceps use. Among colonoscopies that employed forceps polypectomy for non-diminutive polyps, 41% included forceps polypectomy for polyps 6mm or larger. Nearly 1 in 5 colonoscopies had inappropriate forceps polypectomy for non-diminutive polyps, with higher proportions in those with inadequate bowel prep, higher number of polyps, and the presence of polyps in both the right and left colon. A simple quality improvement initiative significantly reduced use of inappropriate forceps polypectomy." @default.
• W3033353695 created "2020-06-12" @default.
• W3033353695 creator A5014214683 @default.
• W3033353695 creator A5062111882 @default.
• W3033353695 creator A5089069575 @default.
• W3033353695 creator A5089866477 @default.
• W3033353695 date "2020-06-01" @default.
• W3033353695 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3033353695 title "Tu1111 EFFECT OF A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE ON INAPPROPRIATE FORCEPS POLYPECTOMY FOR NON-DIMINUTIVE POLYPS" @default.
• W3033353695 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3283" @default.
• W3033353695 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3033353695 type Work @default.
• W3033353695 sameAs 3033353695 @default.
• W3033353695 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3033353695 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3033353695 hasAuthorship W3033353695A5014214683 @default.
• W3033353695 hasAuthorship W3033353695A5062111882 @default.
• W3033353695 hasAuthorship W3033353695A5089069575 @default.
• W3033353695 hasAuthorship W3033353695A5089866477 @default.
• W3033353695 hasBestOaLocation W30333536951 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C2776914593 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C2780581329 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C121608353 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C126322002 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C141071460 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C2776914593 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C2778435480 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C2780581329 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C526805850 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C61434518 @default.
• W3033353695 hasConceptScore W3033353695C71924100 @default.
• W3033353695 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3033353695 hasLocation W30333536951 @default.
• W3033353695 hasOpenAccess W3033353695 @default.
• W3033353695 hasPrimaryLocation W30333536951 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W1945695017 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W1976070689 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W2074234728 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W2152560568 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W2153146911 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W2182707076 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W2341679857 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W2808209715 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W2810899190 @default.
• W3033353695 hasRelatedWork W3142085503 @default.
• W3033353695 hasVolume "91" @default.
• W3033353695 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3033353695 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3033353695 magId "3033353695" @default.
• W3033353695 workType "article" @default.