Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3033972331> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 96 of
96
with 100 items per page.
- W3033972331 endingPage "1630" @default.
- W3033972331 startingPage "1597" @default.
- W3033972331 abstract "Pooling the relative risk (RR) across studies investigating rare events, for example, adverse events, via meta-analytical methods still presents a challenge to researchers. The main reason for this is the high probability of observing no events in treatment or control group or both, resulting in an undefined log RR (the basis of standard meta-analysis). Other technical challenges ensue, for example, the violation of normality assumptions, or bias due to exclusion of studies and application of continuity corrections, leading to poor performance of standard approaches. In the present simulation study, we compared three recently proposed alternative models (random-effects [RE] Poisson regression, RE zero-inflated Poisson [ZIP] regression, binomial regression) to the standard methods in conjunction with different continuity corrections and to different versions of beta-binomial regression. Based on our investigation of the models' performance in 162 different simulation settings informed by meta-analyses from the Cochrane database and distinguished by different underlying true effects, degrees of between-study heterogeneity, numbers of primary studies, group size ratios, and baseline risks, we recommend the use of the RE Poisson regression model. The beta-binomial model recommended by Kuss (2015) also performed well. Decent performance was also exhibited by the ZIP models, but they also had considerable convergence issues. We stress that these recommendations are only valid for meta-analyses with larger numbers of primary studies. All models are applied to data from two Cochrane reviews to illustrate differences between and issues of the models. Limitations as well as practical implications and recommendations are discussed; a flowchart summarizing recommendations is provided." @default.
- W3033972331 created "2020-06-12" @default.
- W3033972331 creator A5036458860 @default.
- W3033972331 creator A5037536465 @default.
- W3033972331 creator A5059345859 @default.
- W3033972331 date "2020-06-08" @default.
- W3033972331 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W3033972331 title "Comparison of random‐effects meta‐analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study" @default.
- W3033972331 cites W1964562561 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W1966784749 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W1989782940 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2006020119 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2012116364 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2031780439 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2051496470 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2052478986 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2074950349 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2077165978 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2095702029 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2109489289 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2114011456 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2119634512 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2123074327 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2128076015 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2130186688 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2130288184 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2139066039 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2148361291 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2151109508 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2151798316 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2170952317 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2264315242 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2326788999 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2438033049 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2508934593 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2783147278 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2784015963 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2786358356 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2796717871 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2802585811 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2811026575 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2886282933 @default.
- W3033972331 cites W2904702943 @default.
- W3033972331 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900379" @default.
- W3033972331 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32510177" @default.
- W3033972331 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3033972331 type Work @default.
- W3033972331 sameAs 3033972331 @default.
- W3033972331 citedByCount "13" @default.
- W3033972331 countsByYear W30339723312020 @default.
- W3033972331 countsByYear W30339723312021 @default.
- W3033972331 countsByYear W30339723312022 @default.
- W3033972331 countsByYear W30339723312023 @default.
- W3033972331 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3033972331 hasAuthorship W3033972331A5036458860 @default.
- W3033972331 hasAuthorship W3033972331A5037536465 @default.
- W3033972331 hasAuthorship W3033972331A5059345859 @default.
- W3033972331 hasBestOaLocation W30339723311 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C168743327 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C2777317252 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C105795698 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C126322002 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C149782125 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C168743327 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C2777317252 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C33923547 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C71924100 @default.
- W3033972331 hasConceptScore W3033972331C95190672 @default.
- W3033972331 hasFunder F4320320879 @default.
- W3033972331 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W3033972331 hasLocation W30339723311 @default.
- W3033972331 hasOpenAccess W3033972331 @default.
- W3033972331 hasPrimaryLocation W30339723311 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W1575356730 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W2055469806 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W2103418324 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W2147234629 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W2588254567 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W2766281042 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W2792076277 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W2945567754 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W3184514836 @default.
- W3033972331 hasRelatedWork W4292182933 @default.
- W3033972331 hasVolume "62" @default.
- W3033972331 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3033972331 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3033972331 magId "3033972331" @default.
- W3033972331 workType "article" @default.