FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3034040898> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3034040898 endingPage "AB284" @default.
• W3034040898 startingPage "AB284" @default.
• W3034040898 abstract "ERCP is usually the technique of choice to solve biliary obstruction due to its minimally invasive nature. Patients and medical staff have high expectations in the procedure. However, when ERCP fails, patients, their relatives and the doctors in charge might experience some frustration that can be transferred to the endoscopist. Besides, the limit between a failed ERCP with or without complications is very narrow. The psychological response of the endoscopist following a failed ERCP is very poorly studied. To study the possible negative psychological impact on the endoscopist that failure of biliary drainage by means of ERCP may have. Members of the Spanish Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, registered at institutions offering ERCP were sent a questionnaire about the way in which ERCP failure usually affects them. Some modified items from the Hamilton Depresion Rating Scale (HDRS) [1], frequently used in Psychiatry, were employed. Self-reported data were pooled for analysis. 123 endoscopists from across Spain participated in the study. There were 76 or 62% in tertiary referral centers and 47 or 38% in community hospitals. In general, after a failed ERCP 36.5% experienced frequently some decrease in self-esteem. In 44% appeared often feelings of guilt and self-reproach. The usual thoughts for taking the blame were having had a lack of technique, not having carefully studied the image tests or not having been more cautious about indications. 16% experienced sometimes difficulty in falling asleep and they complained of being restless and disturbed during the night. 38% experienced some worry and fear that any complication may arise. 23.5% had from time to time tension and irritability. They also complained slowness of thought and restlessness associated with some kind of anxiety. 44% suffered oftentimes from rumination thinking and their thoughts were repetitively over the failed ERCP. For most endoscopists (82%), what was learned from a failed ERCP was more important than the trouble of failure. 62% claimed that subsequent scheduled procedures after the failed ERCP may be affected. No statistically significant differences were found among either endoscopists working in tertiary or community centers. It appears that ERCP is a highly demanding procedure both technically and psychologically. In our study, up to 34% of endoscopists may suffer from some kind of negative psychological feeling after a failed procedure, although for most of them, every failed ERCP is mainly used in order to improve success in the next. No significant differences between physicians working in large or small centers were found." @default.
• W3034040898 created "2020-06-12" @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5015615329 @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5030043156 @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5048128715 @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5052386432 @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5066249487 @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5069071384 @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5074505299 @default.
• W3034040898 creator A5075424924 @default.
• W3034040898 date "2020-06-01" @default.
• W3034040898 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3034040898 title "Su1055 PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF A FAILED ERCP ON THE ENDOSCOPIST" @default.
• W3034040898 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.1900" @default.
• W3034040898 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3034040898 type Work @default.
• W3034040898 sameAs 3034040898 @default.
• W3034040898 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3034040898 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5015615329 @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5030043156 @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5048128715 @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5052386432 @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5066249487 @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5069071384 @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5074505299 @default.
• W3034040898 hasAuthorship W3034040898A5075424924 @default.
• W3034040898 hasBestOaLocation W30340408981 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2778444009 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2779079380 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2779302386 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2779978724 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C2781466463 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C118552586 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C122980154 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C138496976 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C141071460 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C15744967 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2775967933 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2776135927 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2778444009 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2778451229 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2779079380 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2779302386 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2779978724 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C2781466463 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C512399662 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C558461103 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C61434518 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C71924100 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C77805123 @default.
• W3034040898 hasConceptScore W3034040898C83849319 @default.
• W3034040898 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3034040898 hasLocation W30340408981 @default.
• W3034040898 hasOpenAccess W3034040898 @default.
• W3034040898 hasPrimaryLocation W30340408981 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W2071446026 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W2103410884 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W2144066144 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W2412171526 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W2623551868 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W2724457435 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W3122479492 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W3166674286 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W4214609024 @default.
• W3034040898 hasRelatedWork W7644404 @default.
• W3034040898 hasVolume "91" @default.
• W3034040898 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3034040898 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3034040898 magId "3034040898" @default.
• W3034040898 workType "article" @default.