Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3034235234> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3034235234 endingPage "100131" @default.
- W3034235234 startingPage "100131" @default.
- W3034235234 abstract "Local and systemic glucocorticoids are mainstay therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis. With respect to local glucocorticoids, nasal spray is used extensively, but some patients do not benefit from short-course treatment. Recently, some clinicians have focused on the effects of high-dose local glucocorticoids in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), such as treatment using nasal irrigation, transnasal nebulization, and nose-dripping therapy (nasal drop) with high-dose budesonide. However, there are little data comparing the effect of short-course high-dose local glucocorticoids with regular nasal spray and oral steroids in the treatment of preoperative CRSwNP patients. Furthermore, the appropriate use of different types of glucocorticoids in different endotypes of CRSwNP remains unclear.This randomized controlled clinical research study was performed at a single academic center. Patients who satisfied the criteria of chronic rhinosinusitis with bilateral nasal polyps were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive oral methylprednisolone, 24 mg/d and budesonide nasal spray, 256 μg/d, or intranasal budesonide suspension, 1 mg/d and budesonide nasal spray, 256 μg/d, or budesonide nasal spray, 256 μg/d for one week. Symptoms, endoscopic scores, and tissue and blood inflammatory cells were recorded before and after the study. Adverse events were recorded by clinicians.A total of 127 patients with CRSwNP underwent randomization. The total nasal symptoms scores (TNSS) decreased significantly in all groups compared to those at baseline. The assessment of the reduction in TNSS demonstrated that the change was significantly greater in the nasal drop group than in the nasal spray group (-7.47 vs -4.10, P = 0.032), and it was also greater in the oral steroid group than in the nasal spray group (-7.30 vs -4.10, P = 0.039). A similar trend also appeared in the reduction in Sinonasal-Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22). After treatment, a significantly reduction in NP score was observed in the nasal drop group (-0.82) and oral steroid group (-0.85) compared with that in the nasal spray group (-0.10), and there was no significant difference between the nasal drop and oral steroid groups (P = 0.98). While calculating the percentage of patients who were sensitive to glucocorticoid treatment, there was 10.26% in the nasal spray group, 47.37% in the nasal drop group, and 52.50% in the oral steroid group that were sensitive to glucocorticoid treatment. The reduction in NP score was more significant in patients with eosinophilic CRSwNP in the nasal drop group and oral steroid group than in the nasal spray group. However, in patients with non-eosinophilic CRSwNP, the change in NP size was similar in the different treatment groups.Budesonide suspension nasal drop can significantly improve the quality of life and reduce the endoscopic score following short-course treatment, and the treatment effect of nasal drop was better than that of regular nasal spray. Budesonide nasal suspension can be used as a regular treatment for eosinophilic CRSwNP and can be an alternative choice for patients with a high percentage of tissue eosinophil infiltration who cannot use oral glucocorticoids." @default.
- W3034235234 created "2020-06-19" @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5009329226 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5043362527 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5047645413 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5052759717 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5061125069 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5062877002 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5066295671 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5071263286 @default.
- W3034235234 creator A5081406793 @default.
- W3034235234 date "2020-06-01" @default.
- W3034235234 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W3034235234 title "Effect of short-course glucocorticoid application on patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps" @default.
- W3034235234 cites W1762605472 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W1895226062 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W1964685529 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W1970354614 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W1971420830 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W1972693426 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2013336553 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2019461774 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2020442272 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2020607200 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2052043039 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2052106072 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2059917187 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2086033558 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2096472145 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2124204692 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2138563820 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2158601360 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2158794676 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2164833918 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2168515303 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2181071576 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2209809104 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2273717210 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2289410164 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2507811495 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2615812620 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2765458711 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2765714933 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2802610523 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2891271335 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2896766242 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2898329328 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2902904275 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2911643863 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2915801199 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2915992747 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2917477123 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2952648852 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W2993259418 @default.
- W3034235234 cites W4254651116 @default.
- W3034235234 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100131" @default.
- W3034235234 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7300158" @default.
- W3034235234 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32566071" @default.
- W3034235234 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3034235234 type Work @default.
- W3034235234 sameAs 3034235234 @default.
- W3034235234 citedByCount "12" @default.
- W3034235234 countsByYear W30342352342021 @default.
- W3034235234 countsByYear W30342352342022 @default.
- W3034235234 countsByYear W30342352342023 @default.
- W3034235234 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5009329226 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5043362527 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5047645413 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5052759717 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5061125069 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5062877002 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5066295671 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5071263286 @default.
- W3034235234 hasAuthorship W3034235234A5081406793 @default.
- W3034235234 hasBestOaLocation W30342352341 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2776136866 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2776804153 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2777768476 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2778311950 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2780841215 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2780973058 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2781390199 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C2909814679 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C3019717275 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C85663871 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConceptScore W3034235234C126322002 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConceptScore W3034235234C141071460 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConceptScore W3034235234C197934379 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConceptScore W3034235234C203014093 @default.
- W3034235234 hasConceptScore W3034235234C2776136866 @default.