FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3034249610> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3034249610 endingPage "668.e1" @default.
• W3034249610 startingPage "658" @default.
• W3034249610 abstract "Rationale & Objective The effect of glycemic status on nephrolithiasis risk remains controversial. This study sought to examine the association of glycemic status and insulin resistance with incident nephrolithiasis. Study Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants 278,628 Korean adults without nephrolithiasis who underwent a comprehensive health examination between 2011 and 2017. Exposures Glucose level, glycated hemoglobin level, and Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Outcome Nephrolithiasis ascertained using abdominal ultrasound. Analytical Approach A parametric proportional hazard model was used to estimate adjusted HRs and 95% CIs. We explored prespecified potential sex differences in the association of glycemic status and incident nephrolithiasis. Results During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 6,904 participants developed nephrolithiasis. Associations between levels of glycemic status and incident nephrolithiasis were examined separately in men and women (P for interaction = 0.003). Among men, multivariable-adjusted HRs for incident nephrolithiasis comparing glucose levels of 90-99, 100-125, and ≥ 126 mg/dL were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.19), 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.21), and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.10-1.46), respectively, while HRs for incident nephrolithiasis comparing glycated hemoglobin levels of 5.7%-5.9%, 6.0%-6.4%, and 6.5%-<5.7% were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.96-1.10), 1.18 (95% CI, 1.07-1.31), and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.06-1.37), respectively. The HR for incident nephrolithiasis comparing the highest HOMA-IR quintile to the lowest quintile was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.06-1.31). Among women, no apparent association was found between glycemic status and nephrolithiasis risk. Limitations Glucose tolerance testing and computed tomography assessment for nephrolithiasis were not available. Conclusions Higher glycemic values, even within the normoglycemic range, and HOMA-IR were positively associated with increased risk for nephrolithiasis, associations that were only observed among men. Insulin resistance and hyperglycemia may contribute to the development of nephrolithiasis, particularly among men. The effect of glycemic status on nephrolithiasis risk remains controversial. This study sought to examine the association of glycemic status and insulin resistance with incident nephrolithiasis. A retrospective cohort study. 278,628 Korean adults without nephrolithiasis who underwent a comprehensive health examination between 2011 and 2017. Glucose level, glycated hemoglobin level, and Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Nephrolithiasis ascertained using abdominal ultrasound. A parametric proportional hazard model was used to estimate adjusted HRs and 95% CIs. We explored prespecified potential sex differences in the association of glycemic status and incident nephrolithiasis. During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 6,904 participants developed nephrolithiasis. Associations between levels of glycemic status and incident nephrolithiasis were examined separately in men and women (P for interaction = 0.003). Among men, multivariable-adjusted HRs for incident nephrolithiasis comparing glucose levels of 90-99, 100-125, and ≥ 126 mg/dL were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.19), 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.21), and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.10-1.46), respectively, while HRs for incident nephrolithiasis comparing glycated hemoglobin levels of 5.7%-5.9%, 6.0%-6.4%, and 6.5%-<5.7% were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.96-1.10), 1.18 (95% CI, 1.07-1.31), and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.06-1.37), respectively. The HR for incident nephrolithiasis comparing the highest HOMA-IR quintile to the lowest quintile was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.06-1.31). Among women, no apparent association was found between glycemic status and nephrolithiasis risk. Glucose tolerance testing and computed tomography assessment for nephrolithiasis were not available. Higher glycemic values, even within the normoglycemic range, and HOMA-IR were positively associated with increased risk for nephrolithiasis, associations that were only observed among men. Insulin resistance and hyperglycemia may contribute to the development of nephrolithiasis, particularly among men." @default.
• W3034249610 created "2020-06-19" @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5000954129 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5023237097 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5035938328 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5037291245 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5037316372 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5051939978 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5054372269 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5059869660 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5068397724 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5075231184 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5086842226 @default.
• W3034249610 creator A5087158458 @default.
• W3034249610 date "2020-11-01" @default.
• W3034249610 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3034249610 title "Glycemic Status, Insulin Resistance, and the Risk of Nephrolithiasis: A Cohort Study" @default.
• W3034249610 cites W1914925872 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W1964804876 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W1976656734 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W1988760425 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W1991116908 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2001772254 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2004654169 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2016468995 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2027532701 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2028854741 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2066178370 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2066222765 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2072464102 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2079717293 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2097907830 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2099830934 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2107797783 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2109465957 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2115168981 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2118744821 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2135369095 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2140265778 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2148529070 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2162963008 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2171129594 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2171942415 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2178883737 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2290487107 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2344504512 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2560434922 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W2606485088 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W4210983011 @default.
• W3034249610 cites W4250734641 @default.
• W3034249610 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.03.013" @default.
• W3034249610 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32534797" @default.
• W3034249610 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3034249610 type Work @default.
• W3034249610 sameAs 3034249610 @default.
• W3034249610 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W3034249610 countsByYear W30342496102021 @default.
• W3034249610 countsByYear W30342496102022 @default.
• W3034249610 countsByYear W30342496102023 @default.
• W3034249610 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5000954129 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5023237097 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5035938328 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5037291245 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5037316372 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5051939978 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5054372269 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5059869660 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5068397724 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5075231184 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5086842226 @default.
• W3034249610 hasAuthorship W3034249610A5087158458 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C2777180221 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C2777391703 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C2777538456 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C2779306644 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C2780473172 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C126322002 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C134018914 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C201903717 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C207103383 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C2777180221 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C2777391703 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C2777538456 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C2779306644 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C2780473172 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C44249647 @default.
• W3034249610 hasConceptScore W3034249610C50382708 @default.

• next