FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3035166475> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3035166475 endingPage "2279.e12" @default.
• W3035166475 startingPage "2279.e1" @default.
• W3035166475 abstract "Purpose To investigate a predisposition to mandibular angle fractures, a retrospective study was performed in which fractured mandibles were compared with healthy mandibles with no history of fracture. Other investigations of angle fracture risk have exclusively studied patients with existing fractures. In addition, the risk has not been comprehensively explained in conjunction with the specific features of mandibular anatomy. We sought to characterize any anatomic variations between the jaws that had fractured and those that had never fractured. Materials and Methods Healthy mandibles with no history of fracture were physically measured at the William M. Bass Skeletal Collection at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville and compared with fractured mandibles from computed tomography (CT) scans at the Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center. A total of 52 healthy mandibles and 44 CT scans were evaluated. MATLAB machine learning algorithms (MathWorks, Natick, MA) were used to compare the study populations and isolate those anatomic features that differed between healthy and fractured mandibles. Results Machine learning classifiers were able to differentiate between male and female jaws, with the condylion–gnathion distance the most distinguishing feature. The 6 most common anatomic features that differed between healthy and fractured mandibles were the 1) retromolar space, 2) perimeter of the cross-section just proximal to the second molar, 3) breadth of the ramal cross-section, 4) thickness of the oblique ridge, 5) transgonial angle, and 6) location of the ipsilateral mental foramen. The presence of third molars was also related to fracture risk, with third molars present in 72.7% of the fractured mandibles versus 26.9% of unfractured mandibles. Of the fractured mandibles with third molars present, 87.5% had the fracture running directly through the tooth or its socket. Conclusions The results from the present study have provided evidence that anatomic differences exist between mandibles that sustain angle fractures and those that do not. Although much of the morphology was found to be interdependent, the fracture risk could be accurately predicted using 6 anatomic features. Understanding these mandibular variations and identifying patients vulnerable to mandibular fracture could provide clinicians with additional objective information. Furthermore, using the methods demonstrated in our study, future research could focus on developing an algorithm that includes these unique anatomic features in the hope of assisting surgeons in providing tailored treatment for mandibular angle fractures according to patient-specific morphology." @default.
• W3035166475 created "2020-06-19" @default.
• W3035166475 creator A5018590944 @default.
• W3035166475 creator A5019711407 @default.
• W3035166475 creator A5050540982 @default.
• W3035166475 creator A5077988989 @default.
• W3035166475 creator A5089693574 @default.
• W3035166475 date "2020-12-01" @default.
• W3035166475 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3035166475 title "An Anatomic Predisposition to Mandibular Angle Fractures" @default.
• W3035166475 cites W1977831127 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W1978472636 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W1986660334 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W1997308572 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2002210794 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2015055334 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2016863921 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2022064794 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2036664372 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2046078800 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2074390281 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2077210333 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2089475449 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2095259053 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2145104836 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2509473138 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2581707971 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2748327635 @default.
• W3035166475 cites W2891719584 @default.
• W3035166475 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.042" @default.
• W3035166475 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32649890" @default.
• W3035166475 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3035166475 type Work @default.
• W3035166475 sameAs 3035166475 @default.
• W3035166475 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3035166475 countsByYear W30351664752021 @default.
• W3035166475 countsByYear W30351664752022 @default.
• W3035166475 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3035166475 hasAuthorship W3035166475A5018590944 @default.
• W3035166475 hasAuthorship W3035166475A5019711407 @default.
• W3035166475 hasAuthorship W3035166475A5050540982 @default.
• W3035166475 hasAuthorship W3035166475A5077988989 @default.
• W3035166475 hasAuthorship W3035166475A5089693574 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C157369684 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C2778636310 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C2779018087 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C2779767645 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C2780157959 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C3017695358 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C105702510 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C126838900 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C157369684 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C199343813 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C202271784 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C2778636310 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C2779018087 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C2779767645 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C2780157959 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C29694066 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C3017695358 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C36454342 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C59822182 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C71924100 @default.
• W3035166475 hasConceptScore W3035166475C86803240 @default.
• W3035166475 hasFunder F4320310400 @default.
• W3035166475 hasFunder F4320310423 @default.
• W3035166475 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W3035166475 hasLocation W30351664751 @default.
• W3035166475 hasOpenAccess W3035166475 @default.
• W3035166475 hasPrimaryLocation W30351664751 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2053674028 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2074447629 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2091969123 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2342952676 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2363652855 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2365264170 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2378708604 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2405342644 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W2440787519 @default.
• W3035166475 hasRelatedWork W4210802276 @default.
• W3035166475 hasVolume "78" @default.
• W3035166475 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3035166475 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3035166475 magId "3035166475" @default.
• W3035166475 workType "article" @default.