Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3035307628> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3035307628 endingPage "e19713" @default.
- W3035307628 startingPage "e19713" @default.
- W3035307628 abstract "Background When someone needs to know whether and when to seek medical attention, there are a range of options to consider. Each will have consequences for the individual (primarily considering trust, convenience, usefulness, and opportunity costs) and for the wider health system (affecting clinical throughput, cost, and system efficiency). Digital symptom assessment technologies that leverage artificial intelligence may help patients navigate to the right type of care with the correct degree of urgency. However, a recent review highlighted a gap in the literature on the real-world usability of these technologies. Objective We sought to explore the usability, acceptability, and utility of one such symptom assessment technology, Ada, in a primary care setting. Methods Patients with a new complaint attending a primary care clinic in South London were invited to use a custom version of the Ada symptom assessment mobile app. This exploratory pilot study was conducted between November 2017 and January 2018 in a practice with 20,000 registered patients. Participants were asked to complete an Ada self-assessment about their presenting complaint on a study smartphone, with assistance provided if required. Perceptions on the app and its utility were collected through a self-completed study questionnaire following completion of the Ada self-assessment. Results Over a 3-month period, 523 patients participated. Most were female (n=325, 62.1%), mean age 39.79 years (SD 17.7 years), with a larger proportion (413/506, 81.6%) of working-age individuals (aged 15-64) than the general population (66.0%). Participants rated Ada’s ease of use highly, with most (511/522, 97.8%) reporting it was very or quite easy. Most would use Ada again (443/503, 88.1%) and agreed they would recommend it to a friend or relative (444/520, 85.3%). We identified a number of age-related trends among respondents, with a directional trend for more young respondents to report Ada had provided helpful advice (50/54, 93%, 18-24-year olds reported helpful) than older respondents (19/32, 59%, adults aged 70+ reported helpful). We found no sex differences on any of the usability questions fielded. While most respondents reported that using the symptom checker would not have made a difference in their care-seeking behavior (425/494, 86.0%), a sizable minority (63/494, 12.8%) reported they would have used lower-intensity care such as self-care, pharmacy, or delaying their appointment. The proportion was higher for patients aged 18-24 (11/50, 22%) than aged 70+ (0/28, 0%). Conclusions In this exploratory pilot study, the digital symptom checker was rated as highly usable and acceptable by patients in a primary care setting. Further research is needed to confirm whether the app might appropriately direct patients to timely care, and understand how this might save resources for the health system. More work is also needed to ensure the benefits accrue equally to older age groups." @default.
- W3035307628 created "2020-06-19" @default.
- W3035307628 creator A5015665351 @default.
- W3035307628 creator A5047548456 @default.
- W3035307628 creator A5069872593 @default.
- W3035307628 creator A5083800253 @default.
- W3035307628 date "2020-07-10" @default.
- W3035307628 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3035307628 title "Patients’ Utilization and Perception of an Artificial Intelligence–Based Symptom Assessment and Advice Technology in a British Primary Care Waiting Room: Exploratory Pilot Study" @default.
- W3035307628 cites W1553663179 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W1838071484 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W1839239336 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2097886164 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2111915217 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2117423079 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2149886584 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2171284331 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2204320666 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2312931650 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2331439827 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2548551821 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2616270221 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2765304416 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2782898451 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2804955212 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2899560923 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2903513497 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2954965067 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2963299613 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2965593496 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2966765155 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2967601413 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2971469193 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2982083314 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W2998293911 @default.
- W3035307628 cites W3023316617 @default.
- W3035307628 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/19713" @default.
- W3035307628 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7382011" @default.
- W3035307628 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32540836" @default.
- W3035307628 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3035307628 type Work @default.
- W3035307628 sameAs 3035307628 @default.
- W3035307628 citedByCount "69" @default.
- W3035307628 countsByYear W30353076282020 @default.
- W3035307628 countsByYear W30353076282021 @default.
- W3035307628 countsByYear W30353076282022 @default.
- W3035307628 countsByYear W30353076282023 @default.
- W3035307628 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3035307628 hasAuthorship W3035307628A5015665351 @default.
- W3035307628 hasAuthorship W3035307628A5047548456 @default.
- W3035307628 hasAuthorship W3035307628A5069872593 @default.
- W3035307628 hasAuthorship W3035307628A5083800253 @default.
- W3035307628 hasBestOaLocation W30353076281 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C2780838233 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C107457646 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C15744967 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C160735492 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C162324750 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C169760540 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C170130773 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C17744445 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C199539241 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C26760741 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C2780838233 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C2908647359 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C41008148 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C50522688 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C512399662 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C71924100 @default.
- W3035307628 hasConceptScore W3035307628C99454951 @default.
- W3035307628 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W3035307628 hasLocation W30353076281 @default.
- W3035307628 hasLocation W30353076282 @default.
- W3035307628 hasLocation W30353076283 @default.
- W3035307628 hasOpenAccess W3035307628 @default.
- W3035307628 hasPrimaryLocation W30353076281 @default.
- W3035307628 hasRelatedWork W1596393722 @default.
- W3035307628 hasRelatedWork W1885497808 @default.
- W3035307628 hasRelatedWork W1973769527 @default.
- W3035307628 hasRelatedWork W2022249118 @default.
- W3035307628 hasRelatedWork W2046737675 @default.
- W3035307628 hasRelatedWork W2072761933 @default.
- W3035307628 hasRelatedWork W2347345225 @default.