FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3036278291> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3036278291 endingPage "909.e8" @default.
• W3036278291 startingPage "909.e1" @default.
• W3036278291 abstract "Background To accommodate passage through the birth canal, the fetal skull is compressed and reshaped, a phenomenon known as molding. The fetal skull bones are separated by membranous sutures that facilitate compression and overlap, resulting in a reduced diameter. This increases the probability of a successful vaginal delivery. Fetal position, presentation, station, and attitude can be examined with ultrasound, but fetal head molding has not been previously studied with ultrasound. Objective This study aimed to describe ultrasound-assessed fetal head molding in a population of nulliparous women with slow progress in the second stage of labor and to study associations with fetal position and delivery mode. Study Design This was a secondary analysis of a population comprising 150 nulliparous women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation, with slow progress in the active second stage with pushing. Women were eligible for the study when an operative intervention was considered by the clinician. Molding was examined in stored transperineal two-dimensional and three-dimensional acquisitions and differentiated into occipitoparietal molding along the lambdoidal sutures, frontoparietal molding along the coronal sutures, and parietoparietal molding at the sagittal suture (molding in the midline). Molding could not be classified if positions were unknown, and these cases were excluded. We measured the distance from the molding to the head midline, molding step, and overlap of skull bones and looked for associations with fetal position and delivery mode. The responsible clinicians were blinded to the ultrasound findings. Results Six cases with unknown position were excluded, leaving 144 women in the study population. Fetal position was anterior in 117 cases, transverse in 12 cases, and posterior in 15 cases. Molding was observed in 79 of 144 (55%) fetuses. Molding was seen significantly more often in occiput anterior positions than in non–occiput anterior positions (69 of 117 [59%] vs 10 of 27 [37%]; P=.04). In occiput anterior positions, the molding was seen as occipitoparietal molding in 68 of 69 cases and as parietoparietal molding in 1 case with deflexed attitude. Molding was seen in 19 of 38 (50%) of occiput anterior positions ending with spontaneous delivery, 42 of 71(59%) ending with vacuum extraction, and in 7 of 8 (88%) with failed vacuum extraction (P=.13). In 4 fetuses with occiput posterior positions, parietoparietal molding was diagnosed, and successful vacuum extraction occurred in 3 cases and failed extraction in 1. Frontoparietal molding was seen in 2 transverse positions and 4 posterior positions. One delivered spontaneously; vacuum extraction failed in 3 cases and was successful in 2. Only 1 of 11 fetuses with either parietoparietal or frontoparietal molding was delivered spontaneously. Conclusion The different types of molding can be classified with ultrasound. Occipitoparietal molding was commonly seen in occiput anterior positions and not significantly associated with delivery mode. Frontoparietal and parietoparietal moldings were less frequent than reported in old studies and should be studied in larger populations with mixed ethnicities. To accommodate passage through the birth canal, the fetal skull is compressed and reshaped, a phenomenon known as molding. The fetal skull bones are separated by membranous sutures that facilitate compression and overlap, resulting in a reduced diameter. This increases the probability of a successful vaginal delivery. Fetal position, presentation, station, and attitude can be examined with ultrasound, but fetal head molding has not been previously studied with ultrasound. This study aimed to describe ultrasound-assessed fetal head molding in a population of nulliparous women with slow progress in the second stage of labor and to study associations with fetal position and delivery mode. This was a secondary analysis of a population comprising 150 nulliparous women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation, with slow progress in the active second stage with pushing. Women were eligible for the study when an operative intervention was considered by the clinician. Molding was examined in stored transperineal two-dimensional and three-dimensional acquisitions and differentiated into occipitoparietal molding along the lambdoidal sutures, frontoparietal molding along the coronal sutures, and parietoparietal molding at the sagittal suture (molding in the midline). Molding could not be classified if positions were unknown, and these cases were excluded. We measured the distance from the molding to the head midline, molding step, and overlap of skull bones and looked for associations with fetal position and delivery mode. The responsible clinicians were blinded to the ultrasound findings. Six cases with unknown position were excluded, leaving 144 women in the study population. Fetal position was anterior in 117 cases, transverse in 12 cases, and posterior in 15 cases. Molding was observed in 79 of 144 (55%) fetuses. Molding was seen significantly more often in occiput anterior positions than in non–occiput anterior positions (69 of 117 [59%] vs 10 of 27 [37%]; P=.04). In occiput anterior positions, the molding was seen as occipitoparietal molding in 68 of 69 cases and as parietoparietal molding in 1 case with deflexed attitude. Molding was seen in 19 of 38 (50%) of occiput anterior positions ending with spontaneous delivery, 42 of 71(59%) ending with vacuum extraction, and in 7 of 8 (88%) with failed vacuum extraction (P=.13). In 4 fetuses with occiput posterior positions, parietoparietal molding was diagnosed, and successful vacuum extraction occurred in 3 cases and failed extraction in 1. Frontoparietal molding was seen in 2 transverse positions and 4 posterior positions. One delivered spontaneously; vacuum extraction failed in 3 cases and was successful in 2. Only 1 of 11 fetuses with either parietoparietal or frontoparietal molding was delivered spontaneously. The different types of molding can be classified with ultrasound. Occipitoparietal molding was commonly seen in occiput anterior positions and not significantly associated with delivery mode. Frontoparietal and parietoparietal moldings were less frequent than reported in old studies and should be studied in larger populations with mixed ethnicities." @default.
• W3036278291 created "2020-06-25" @default.
• W3036278291 creator A5006529391 @default.
• W3036278291 creator A5020573936 @default.
• W3036278291 creator A5047973360 @default.
• W3036278291 creator A5088490808 @default.
• W3036278291 date "2020-12-01" @default.
• W3036278291 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3036278291 title "Fetal molding examined with transperineal ultrasound and associations with position and delivery mode" @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1718338880 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1743901874 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1901309303 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1978215037 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1984336877 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1987926802 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1989189657 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W1999101539 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2004491106 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2009456537 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2015214105 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2020135857 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2020536813 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2042031815 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2042692843 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2044372043 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2048725876 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2050121182 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2064659103 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2079546325 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2088620381 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2088915407 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2091423085 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2096230879 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2101992499 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2102311960 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2122305220 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2123914755 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2134237123 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2165610272 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2204894127 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2261024164 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2597100025 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2738796267 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2803698222 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2817564043 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2899505472 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2903848399 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2922860380 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2945153817 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2946628383 @default.
• W3036278291 cites W2978142302 @default.
• W3036278291 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.042" @default.
• W3036278291 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32585224" @default.
• W3036278291 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3036278291 type Work @default.
• W3036278291 sameAs 3036278291 @default.
• W3036278291 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W3036278291 countsByYear W30362782912021 @default.
• W3036278291 countsByYear W30362782912022 @default.
• W3036278291 countsByYear W30362782912023 @default.
• W3036278291 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3036278291 hasAuthorship W3036278291A5006529391 @default.
• W3036278291 hasAuthorship W3036278291A5020573936 @default.
• W3036278291 hasAuthorship W3036278291A5047973360 @default.
• W3036278291 hasAuthorship W3036278291A5088490808 @default.
• W3036278291 hasBestOaLocation W30362782912 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2778408130 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2779300802 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2779811377 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2781173009 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C54942250 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C67558686 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C126838900 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C131872663 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C141071460 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C143753070 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C159985019 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C172680121 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C192562407 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C199343813 @default.
• W3036278291 hasConceptScore W3036278291C2777327002 @default.

• next