FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3036406410> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3036406410 endingPage "787" @default.
• W3036406410 startingPage "786" @default.
• W3036406410 abstract "Central MessageExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to transplant has yielded positive outcomes. However, in the context of pulmonary hypertension and in emergently listed candidates one must exercise caution in this group of patients most uniquely capable of burning the very bridge to transplantation on which they are supported. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to transplant has yielded positive outcomes. However, in the context of pulmonary hypertension and in emergently listed candidates one must exercise caution in this group of patients most uniquely capable of burning the very bridge to transplantation on which they are supported. In this edition, Kukreja et al proffer a retrospective review from a single center in which they analyze data pertaining to patients who required extracorporeal support as a bridge to lung transplantation between 2010 and 2018.1Kukreja J. Tsou S. Chen J. et al.Risk factors of extracorporal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 32: 772-785Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (16) Google Scholar The analysis elucidates differences in outcomes between those successfully bridged versus those who failed. Additionally, the authors report discrepancies in results in recipients who were listed electively versus those listed emergently. The report is timely, relevant and, in particular, addresses the fate of those patients who were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) but not ultimately listed for transplantation. Their results reflect reports in the literature that have demonstrated steady improvement in ECMO outcomes over the past decade.2Hayanga A.J. Aboagye J. Esper S. et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation in the United States: Aan evolving strategy in the management of rapidly advancing pulmonary disease.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 149: 291-296Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar Indeed, bridging to lung transplantation using mechanical support may conceivably surpass mechanical ventilation as the bridging option of choice.3Hayanga J.W.A. Hayanga H.K. Holmes S.D. et al.Mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: Closing the gap.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019; 38: 1104-1111Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar One must, nevertheless, bear in mind that the small sample size precluded the ability to perform multivariate analysis, and the conclusions are derived purely from univariate analysis. Furthermore, the independent effects of collinearity and confounding have not necessarily been comprehensively discussed. The results are nevertheless, compelling. The authors duly implicate the role of right ventricular dysfunction as an Achilles’ heel and indeed one that, anecdotally, has plagued ECMO bridging from the outset. They provide the tacit acknowledgment of the nuanced complexity of blood type B, its relative rarity, and its consequent ability to prolong waitlist time. Albeit without a reference height, the impact of short stature was quantified as a day in waitlist duration for every centimeter decrease in height. One assumes this to be a deviation from average US height. Most ambitious in this account, however, was the enthusiasm and willingness to tackle and list patients who had been emergently placed on mechanical support without any prior multidisciplinary assessment or previous transplant evaluation. Approximately one-third of all the recipients fulfilled these criteria. Vociferous arguments exist both for and against this practice. The excellent outcomes, however, must duly be acknowledged and for which the authors will be applauded as kudos for a high-risk undertaking. Germane to the ethical debate, it is clear that the patients placed on ECMO but not ultimately listed had been offered the only chance of life without which they would have had no options (without extracorporeal support). Nevertheless, there is a high socioeconomic and geopolitical burden inherent in this approach that would argue against it. This controversy is particularly poignant in the context of E-cigarette or Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury or in the era of COVID-19.4Aldy K. Cao D.J. McGetrick M. et al.Severe E-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury requiring venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020; 21: 385-388Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar,5MacLaren G Fisher D Brodie D Preparing for the most critically ill patients with COVID-19: The potential role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.JAMA. 2020; (Feb 19. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2342. Online ahead of print.)Crossref PubMed Scopus (303) Google Scholar In keeping with the ISHLT recommendations and within the ethical prism of the narrative, however, one must still maintain an abundance of caution in pursuing transplantation in a cohort of patients most uniquely capable of burning the very bridge to transplantation on which they are supported.6Weill D Benden C Corris PA et al.A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014—An update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015; 34: 1-15Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (957) Google Scholar Risk Factors and Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Bridge to Lung TransplantationSeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 32Issue 4PreviewThis study aimed to identify outcome determinants for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) at our institution.This retrospective single-center study reviewed patients on ECMO between 2010 and 2018 and compared clinical characteristics between patients who underwent successful-BTT and those who did not. Additionally, we examined differences between actively versus emergently listed patients and reasons for failure-to-list. Seventy-six patients were placed on ECMO with the intent to bridge to transplant. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W3036406410 created "2020-06-25" @default.
• W3036406410 creator A5010516571 @default.
• W3036406410 creator A5019566394 @default.
• W3036406410 creator A5030572445 @default.
• W3036406410 creator A5056029262 @default.
• W3036406410 creator A5079404229 @default.
• W3036406410 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W3036406410 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3036406410 title "Commentary: Burning Your Bridges" @default.
• W3036406410 cites W2028558343 @default.
• W3036406410 cites W2039223561 @default.
• W3036406410 cites W2953560440 @default.
• W3036406410 cites W3008421357 @default.
• W3036406410 cites W3011589301 @default.
• W3036406410 cites W3027078729 @default.
• W3036406410 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.06.009" @default.
• W3036406410 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7305718" @default.
• W3036406410 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32569650" @default.
• W3036406410 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3036406410 type Work @default.
• W3036406410 sameAs 3036406410 @default.
• W3036406410 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3036406410 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3036406410 hasAuthorship W3036406410A5010516571 @default.
• W3036406410 hasAuthorship W3036406410A5019566394 @default.
• W3036406410 hasAuthorship W3036406410A5030572445 @default.
• W3036406410 hasAuthorship W3036406410A5056029262 @default.
• W3036406410 hasAuthorship W3036406410A5079404229 @default.
• W3036406410 hasBestOaLocation W30364064101 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C100776233 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C2776858399 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C2780073493 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C2780930700 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C2781448352 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C100776233 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C141071460 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C151730666 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C164705383 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C167135981 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C177713679 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C2776858399 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C2779343474 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C2780073493 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C2780930700 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C2781448352 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C2911091166 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C71924100 @default.
• W3036406410 hasConceptScore W3036406410C86803240 @default.
• W3036406410 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3036406410 hasLocation W30364064101 @default.
• W3036406410 hasLocation W30364064102 @default.
• W3036406410 hasLocation W30364064103 @default.
• W3036406410 hasOpenAccess W3036406410 @default.
• W3036406410 hasPrimaryLocation W30364064101 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W2001642818 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W2021473600 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W2046069863 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W2331207641 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W2589866513 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W2906418972 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W3030385200 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W3032053894 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W3137932289 @default.
• W3036406410 hasRelatedWork W4297809391 @default.
• W3036406410 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W3036406410 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3036406410 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3036406410 magId "3036406410" @default.
• W3036406410 workType "article" @default.