FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3036455479> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3036455479 abstract "Abstract Background Incorporating patient preference (PP) information into decision-making has become increasingly important to many stakeholders. However, there is little guidance on which patient preference assessment methods, including preference exploration (qualitative) and elicitation (quantitative) methods, are most suitable for decision-making at different stages in the medical product lifecycle (MPLC). This study aimed to use an empirical approach to assess which attributes of PP assessment methods are most important, and to identify which methods are most suitable, for decision-makers’ needs during different stages in the MPLC. Methods A four-step cumulative approach was taken: 1) Identify important criteria to appraise methods through a Q-methodology exercise, 2) Determine numerical weights to ascertain the relative importance of each criterion through an analytical hierarchy process, 3) Assess the performance of 33 PP methods by applying these weights, consulting international health preference research experts and review of literature, and 4) Compare and rank the methods within taxonomy groups reflecting their similar techniques to identify the most promising methods. Results The Q-methodology exercise was completed by 54 stakeholders with PP study experience, and the analytical hierarchy process was completed by 85 stakeholders with PP study experience. Additionally, 17 health preference research experts were consulted to assess the performance of the PP methods. Thirteen promising preference exploration and elicitation methods were identified as likely to meet decision-makers’ needs. Additionally, eight other methods that decision-makers might consider were identified, although they appeared appropriate only for some stages of the MPLC. Conclusions This transparent, weighted approach to the comparison of methods supports decision-makers and researchers in selecting PP methods most appropriate for a given application." @default.
• W3036455479 created "2020-06-25" @default.
• W3036455479 creator A5007711014 @default.
• W3036455479 creator A5019463221 @default.
• W3036455479 creator A5045284837 @default.
• W3036455479 creator A5059642441 @default.
• W3036455479 creator A5062792363 @default.
• W3036455479 creator A5082114306 @default.
• W3036455479 creator A5090931498 @default.
• W3036455479 date "2020-06-19" @default.
• W3036455479 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3036455479 title "Appraising patient preference methods for decision-making in the medical product lifecycle: an empirical comparison" @default.
• W3036455479 cites W1963655754 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W1983122360 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W1987293279 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W1987629986 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W1994868670 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W1996468947 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2003552981 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2033166018 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2048709304 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2089174201 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2090525533 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2091310835 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2092553756 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2098534719 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2106240513 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2110142496 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2122152808 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2157237487 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2189340722 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2333009280 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2511659939 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2514849762 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2594599530 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2892818464 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W2895773179 @default.
• W3036455479 cites W4254347811 @default.
• W3036455479 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01142-w" @default.
• W3036455479 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7304129" @default.
• W3036455479 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32560655" @default.
• W3036455479 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3036455479 type Work @default.
• W3036455479 sameAs 3036455479 @default.
• W3036455479 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W3036455479 countsByYear W30364554792020 @default.
• W3036455479 countsByYear W30364554792021 @default.
• W3036455479 countsByYear W30364554792022 @default.
• W3036455479 countsByYear W30364554792023 @default.
• W3036455479 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3036455479 hasAuthorship W3036455479A5007711014 @default.
• W3036455479 hasAuthorship W3036455479A5019463221 @default.
• W3036455479 hasAuthorship W3036455479A5045284837 @default.
• W3036455479 hasAuthorship W3036455479A5059642441 @default.
• W3036455479 hasAuthorship W3036455479A5062792363 @default.
• W3036455479 hasAuthorship W3036455479A5082114306 @default.
• W3036455479 hasAuthorship W3036455479A5090931498 @default.
• W3036455479 hasBestOaLocation W30364554791 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C164226766 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C2777868144 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C87345402 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C105795698 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C111919701 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C114614502 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C120936955 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C127413603 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C144133560 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C164226766 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C195094911 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C2524010 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C2777868144 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C2781249084 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C33923547 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C41008148 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C42475967 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C539667460 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C56739046 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C87345402 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C90673727 @default.
• W3036455479 hasConceptScore W3036455479C98045186 @default.
• W3036455479 hasFunder F4320326631 @default.
• W3036455479 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3036455479 hasLocation W30364554791 @default.
• W3036455479 hasLocation W30364554792 @default.

• next