FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3036703449> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3036703449 endingPage "543" @default.
• W3036703449 startingPage "536" @default.
• W3036703449 abstract "Abstract Purpose To explore how registered nurses (certified, noncertified, and managers) value certification as determined by the Perceived Value of Certification Tool, review the psychometric properties of the instrument, and ascertain the benefits and barriers to nursing specialty certification. Design Systematic review (without meta‐analysis) of 18 studies representing 26,534 registered nurses. Methods Rigorous processes were used to minimize bias; to identify, appraise, and synthesize studies to explore how registered nurses value certification; and to ascertain the benefits and barriers to nursing specialty certification. Psychometric properties of the Perceived Value of Certification Tool were also reviewed and evaluated. Methods and results are presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Findings All studies included in the review were cross‐sectional studies with observational, descriptive designs published between 2003 and 2019. The average study participant was a 49‐year‐old Caucasian woman with a bachelor of science in nursing degree and 20 years of experience working as a staff nurse in a hospital. In accordance with the results reported in all studies included in the systematic review, the highest level of agreement and strong agreement occurred with the intrinsic value statements of enhances feeling of personal accomplishment ( n = 16,697; 97.8%), provides personal satisfaction ( n = 16,607; 92.7%), and validates specialized knowledge ( n = 16,697; 97%). The lowest levels of agreement and strong agreement occurred with the extrinsic value statements of promotes recognition from employers ( n = 16,607; 78.6%), increases consumer confidence ( n = 16,607; 73.3%), and increases salary ( n = 16,607; 41.9%). Conclusions The vigorous statistical work completed on the developmental study for the instrument conducted in 2003 has yet to be duplicated in the multiple studies published subsequently. The chiefly descriptive studies detailed in this systematic review are of limited usefulness in guiding future research. The Perceived Value of Certification Tool has proven useful in stimulating interest; however, a revision of the instrument is now required to promote research and patient outcome studies regarding the self‐perceived value of certification in nursing specialties. Clinical Relevance This report systematically reviews 18 studies that have used the Perceived Value of Certification Tool, a tool that has been widely used since 2003, to measure the perceptions of registered nurses regarding specialty certification. This review provides evidence that the instrument has potential for expanded use in patient outcomes studies and should be revised to better serve the needs of researchers." @default.
• W3036703449 created "2020-06-25" @default.
• W3036703449 creator A5017579328 @default.
• W3036703449 creator A5037946782 @default.
• W3036703449 creator A5061450130 @default.
• W3036703449 date "2020-06-20" @default.
• W3036703449 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3036703449 title "What Is the Perceived Value of Certification Among Registered Nurses? A Systematic Review" @default.
• W3036703449 cites W1972312895 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2016674707 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2025809241 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2031319596 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2038677287 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2046102024 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2072446432 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2090917278 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2092532084 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2129280101 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2322911958 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2765423389 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2790945994 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2802555338 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W2893683832 @default.
• W3036703449 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W3036703449 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12579" @default.
• W3036703449 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32564465" @default.
• W3036703449 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3036703449 type Work @default.
• W3036703449 sameAs 3036703449 @default.
• W3036703449 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W3036703449 countsByYear W30367034492020 @default.
• W3036703449 countsByYear W30367034492021 @default.
• W3036703449 countsByYear W30367034492022 @default.
• W3036703449 countsByYear W30367034492023 @default.
• W3036703449 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3036703449 hasAuthorship W3036703449A5017579328 @default.
• W3036703449 hasAuthorship W3036703449A5037946782 @default.
• W3036703449 hasAuthorship W3036703449A5061450130 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C20387591 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C2777626052 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C122980154 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C142724271 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C15744967 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C159110408 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C166957645 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C17744445 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C189708586 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C199539241 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C20387591 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C23131810 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C2777626052 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C2779473830 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C46304622 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C509550671 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C512399662 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C71924100 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C77805123 @default.
• W3036703449 hasConceptScore W3036703449C95457728 @default.
• W3036703449 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3036703449 hasLocation W30367034491 @default.
• W3036703449 hasOpenAccess W3036703449 @default.
• W3036703449 hasPrimaryLocation W30367034491 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W2000811477 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W2066052364 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W2358435779 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W2365653098 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W3026840991 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W3032220911 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W3045293259 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W3127761055 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W4242399787 @default.
• W3036703449 hasRelatedWork W4381328000 @default.
• W3036703449 hasVolume "52" @default.
• W3036703449 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3036703449 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3036703449 magId "3036703449" @default.
• W3036703449 workType "article" @default.