FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3036718535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3036718535 endingPage "141" @default.
• W3036718535 startingPage "133" @default.
• W3036718535 abstract "In Portugal there are no instruments that measure the impact of dysphagia on the quality of life. The aim of this study was the assessment of the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of SWAL-QOL, in a head and neck cancer population. It was a case–control study, with a consecutive sample of 300 subjects that was divided into 3 groups (2 controls and 1 case). We performed principal components analysis, assessed reliability and clinical validity. For concurrent validity of the Portuguese version of SWAL-QOL, the Functional Scale of Oral Intake (FOIS) and the Performance Status Scale (PSS) for patients with head and neck cancer were used. The sample was predominantly male (66%) with a mean age of 57 years. Regarding the patients with head and neck cancer, 22% were in stage IIIA, and 43% had lesions on the larynx. As to the treatment provided, 33% underwent surgery and radiotherapy, and 80% of cases had oral feeding. The psychometric validity of SWAL-QOL was established, with good results for internal consistency (from .665 to .952), reproducibility (from .628 to .877) and construct validity. SWAL-QOL also showed good correlation with the clinical variable dysphagics vs. non-dysphagics. There were no statistical significant differences for the consistency of food and fluids, and oral vs. non-oral nutrition. The validation of SWAL-QOL for the Portuguese language revealed that this instrument is psychometrically valid and appropriate for use with dysphagic patients with head and neck cancer. En Portugal no existen instrumentos que midan el impacto de la disfagia en la calidad de vida. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión portuguesa de SWAL-QOL, en una población de pacientes de cáncer de cabeza y cuello. Estudio de control de casos, con una muestra consecutiva de 300 sujetos, que se dividió en 3 grupos (2 grupos control y un caso). Realizamos un análisis de los componentes principales, y evaluamos la fiabilidad y la validez clínica. Para la validez concurrente de la versión portuguesa de SWAL-QOL, utilizamos la Functional Scale of Oral Intake (FOIS) y la Performance Status Scale (PSS) para los pacientes de cáncer de cabeza y cuello. La muestra se compuso fundamentalmente de varones (66%), con una edad media de 57 años. Con relación a los pacientes de cáncer de cabeza y cuello, el 22% estaba en estadio IIIA y el 43% tenía lesiones en la laringe. En cuanto a la terapia suministrada, el 33% recibió cirugía y radioterapia y el 80% de los casos recibió alimentación oral. Se estableció la validez psicométrica de SWAL-QOL, con buenos resultados para consistencia interna (de 0,665 a 0,592), reproducibilidad (de 0,628 a 0,877), y validez del constructo. SWAL-QOL reflejó también una buena correlación con la variable clínica disfágicos vs no disfágicos. No se produjeron diferencias estadísticamente significativas para la consistencia de alimentos y líquidos y nutrición oral vs no oral. La validación de SWAL-QOL para el idioma portugués reveló que se trata de un instrumento psicométricamente válido para uso con pacientes disfágicos de cáncer de cabeza y cuello." @default.
• W3036718535 created "2020-06-25" @default.
• W3036718535 creator A5014360454 @default.
• W3036718535 creator A5016292431 @default.
• W3036718535 creator A5038882475 @default.
• W3036718535 creator A5057372062 @default.
• W3036718535 date "2021-07-01" @default.
• W3036718535 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3036718535 title "Psychometric validity of the Portuguese version of SWAL-QOL for head and neck cancer" @default.
• W3036718535 cites W1973757338 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W1987714378 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2013297434 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2013526284 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2015274527 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2016756532 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2017368588 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2026798191 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2029138068 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2053432594 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2061223061 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2066712914 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2070137378 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2078002984 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2086894983 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2100669773 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2123393844 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2152848155 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2163414728 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2165139371 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2172288146 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2328014022 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2493980983 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2727309332 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2746389092 @default.
• W3036718535 cites W2783082855 @default.
• W3036718535 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2020.03.015" @default.
• W3036718535 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3036718535 type Work @default.
• W3036718535 sameAs 3036718535 @default.
• W3036718535 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3036718535 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3036718535 hasAuthorship W3036718535A5014360454 @default.
• W3036718535 hasAuthorship W3036718535A5016292431 @default.
• W3036718535 hasAuthorship W3036718535A5038882475 @default.
• W3036718535 hasAuthorship W3036718535A5057372062 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C112497637 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C198999979 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C2776530083 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C2780596822 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C3018868096 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C112497637 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C121608353 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C126322002 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C141071460 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C159110408 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C171606756 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C1862650 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C198999979 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C2776530083 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C2779951463 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C2780596822 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C3018868096 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C49453240 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C70410870 @default.
• W3036718535 hasConceptScore W3036718535C71924100 @default.
• W3036718535 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3036718535 hasLocation W30367185351 @default.
• W3036718535 hasOpenAccess W3036718535 @default.
• W3036718535 hasPrimaryLocation W30367185351 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W1965239951 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W1975956490 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W1996847880 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W2400964677 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W2412875776 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W2769254177 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W2790237985 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W4214519139 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W4244393525 @default.
• W3036718535 hasRelatedWork W4285676877 @default.
• W3036718535 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W3036718535 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3036718535 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3036718535 magId "3036718535" @default.
• W3036718535 workType "article" @default.