Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3036818332> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3036818332 endingPage "484" @default.
- W3036818332 startingPage "461" @default.
- W3036818332 abstract "Purpose Traditional approaches in qualitative research have adopted one research paradigm linked to an established typology. This paper addresses the unconventional application of two research paradigms in one study. A critical realist approach was used to augment a constructivist analysis of data in a research project seeking to explore the meaning that managers in small to medium enterprises (SMEs) attach to hazard identification, the construction of a hazard profile reflective of the business and its use in assisting to manage hazards within the SME's safety management system framework. Critical realism offered a complementary but essential framework to explore causal mechanisms that led to a deeper understanding of the findings by searching for the processes and causality that lay beneath the social and organizational phenomena observed. Design/methodology/approach This paper compares the two research paradigms in order to seek junctures and apply them to a research project. Analytical tools applied to each research paradigm within the project are presented, followed by a new multiparadigm conceptual model that integrates critical realism and constructivism, providing an original contribution of knowledge to this field of qualitative research. Findings The adoption of a multiparadigm model enabled not only the interpretation of social phenomena but also the determination of its causality, enabling a more insightful answering of the research question and leading to a deeper insight into the phenomenology that was studied. This research approach widens the boundaries of qualitative inquiry within organizational research by promoting strategies that challenge more traditionally anchored research typologies, and consequently contributes to better research outcomes. Research limitations/implications This study was conducted across four organizations. Similar research is encouraged across a greater number of case studies to validate the process of using a constructivist and critical realist paradigm to gain a more insightful understanding of events and their causality. Practical implications The comparison of two research paradigms and consequent provision of a conceptual model (Figure 3) provides potential for the development of further multiparadigm models for research projects within the field of organizational management. Social implications This paper has the potential to promote engagement and collaboration between research scholars seeking to explore the use of multiple research paradigms. Originality/value Such an approach has not previously been widely discussed or adopted to examine qualitative data, and advances theory in qualitative research. The application of two research paradigms using such an approach can be applied to businesses in a number of different contexts to gain a more insightful understanding of research participant perspectives, observable events arising from those perspectives and their associated causality." @default.
- W3036818332 created "2020-06-25" @default.
- W3036818332 creator A5036900287 @default.
- W3036818332 creator A5037054095 @default.
- W3036818332 creator A5076168833 @default.
- W3036818332 date "2020-06-16" @default.
- W3036818332 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W3036818332 title "Critical realism and constructivism: merging research paradigms for a deeper qualitative study" @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1548093847 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1964099523 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1965925093 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1969197772 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1975652668 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1979290264 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1984365387 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1984804982 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1985529815 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W1992390340 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2000277455 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2001507775 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2041076536 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2052220791 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2054065758 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2063452171 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2079915942 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2089956001 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2109189229 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2116863162 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2123255466 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2126121517 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2126321946 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2126456539 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2133963989 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2157050477 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2158991786 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2159234684 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2163570416 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2171196717 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2289587231 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2410083900 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2505376099 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2740239618 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2790166588 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2806488268 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2884646530 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2902179859 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W2910157291 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W3121175530 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W3148461778 @default.
- W3036818332 cites W4253283288 @default.
- W3036818332 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/qrom-06-2019-1778" @default.
- W3036818332 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3036818332 type Work @default.
- W3036818332 sameAs 3036818332 @default.
- W3036818332 citedByCount "15" @default.
- W3036818332 countsByYear W30368183322020 @default.
- W3036818332 countsByYear W30368183322021 @default.
- W3036818332 countsByYear W30368183322022 @default.
- W3036818332 countsByYear W30368183322023 @default.
- W3036818332 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3036818332 hasAuthorship W3036818332A5036900287 @default.
- W3036818332 hasAuthorship W3036818332A5037054095 @default.
- W3036818332 hasAuthorship W3036818332A5076168833 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C133281099 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C29717899 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C34355311 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C543847140 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C75795011 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C92936396 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C111472728 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C127413603 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C133281099 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C138885662 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C144024400 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C17744445 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C190248442 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C19165224 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C199539241 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C29717899 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C34355311 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C36289849 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C41008148 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C539667460 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C543847140 @default.
- W3036818332 hasConceptScore W3036818332C56739046 @default.