FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3037665080> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3037665080 abstract "Abstract Background Mechanical plaque removal has been commonly accepted to be the basis for periodontal treatment. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasonic and manual subgingival scaling at different initial probing pocket depths (PPD) in periodontal treatment. Methods English-language databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov, by January, 2019) were searched. Weighted mean differences in primary outcomes, PPD and clinical attachment loss (CAL) reduction, were estimated by random effects model. Secondary outcomes, bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival recession (GR), and post-scaling residual dental calculus, were analyzed by comparing the results of each study. The quality of RCTs was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. The GRADE approach was used to assess quality of evidence. Results Ten randomized controlled trials were included out of 1434 identified. Initial PPD and follow-up periods formed subgroups. For 3-months follow-up: (1) too few shallow initial pocket studies available to draw a conclusion; (2) the heterogeneity of medium depth studies was so high that could not be merged to draw a conclusion; (3) deep pocket studies showed no statistical differences in PPD and CAL reduction between ultrasonic and manual groups. For 6-months follow-up: (1) too few shallow initial PPD studies to draw a conclusion; (2) at medium pocket depth, PPD reduction showed manual subgingival scaling better than ultrasound. No statistical differences were observed in CAL reduction between the two approaches; (3) for deep initial PPD studies, both PPD and CAL reduction showed manual subgingival scaling better. GR results indicated no statistical differences at medium and deep initial pocket studies between the two methods. BOP results showed more reduction at deep pocket depths with manual subgingival scaling. No conclusion could be drawn about residual dental calculus. Conclusion When initial PPD was 4-6 mm, PPD reduction proved manual subgingival scaling was superior, but CAL results showed no statistical differences between the two means. When initial PPD was ≥6 mm, PPD and CAL reductions suggested that manual subgingival scaling was superior." @default.
• W3037665080 created "2020-07-02" @default.
• W3037665080 creator A5061525254 @default.
• W3037665080 creator A5061753323 @default.
• W3037665080 creator A5063286654 @default.
• W3037665080 creator A5075449171 @default.
• W3037665080 creator A5081386201 @default.
• W3037665080 date "2020-06-25" @default.
• W3037665080 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3037665080 title "Treating periodontitis-a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ultrasonic and manual subgingival scaling at different probing pocket depths" @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1520256772 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1939289077 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1965713432 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1967575645 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1968125602 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1969144976 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1985195347 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1987805863 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1988867823 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1992962840 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1995916340 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W1996723752 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2001104262 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2009884438 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2020770644 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2022813005 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2037854146 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2041968465 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2047097550 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2049557405 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2050577614 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2054196221 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2057259168 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2066138890 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2066512986 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2074284285 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2081140222 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2086563640 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2097871335 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2099824040 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2101101187 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2102644664 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2104259288 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2105333370 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2107691553 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2120282532 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2126544020 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2131992942 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2133359914 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2144961543 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2145225014 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2147331510 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2149340053 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2153577956 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2164073643 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2167951348 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2172563432 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2186852451 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2410114756 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2419165767 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2427507332 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2436317410 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2567362164 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2593228368 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2606491090 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2614609027 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2802063533 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2804473136 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2809328317 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2809948294 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W2945620122 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W3024989585 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W34521415 @default.
• W3037665080 cites W4241329465 @default.
• W3037665080 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01117-3" @default.
• W3037665080 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7318456" @default.
• W3037665080 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32586315" @default.
• W3037665080 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3037665080 type Work @default.
• W3037665080 sameAs 3037665080 @default.
• W3037665080 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3037665080 countsByYear W30376650802020 @default.
• W3037665080 countsByYear W30376650802021 @default.
• W3037665080 countsByYear W30376650802022 @default.
• W3037665080 countsByYear W30376650802023 @default.
• W3037665080 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3037665080 hasAuthorship W3037665080A5061525254 @default.
• W3037665080 hasAuthorship W3037665080A5061753323 @default.
• W3037665080 hasAuthorship W3037665080A5063286654 @default.
• W3037665080 hasAuthorship W3037665080A5075449171 @default.
• W3037665080 hasAuthorship W3037665080A5081386201 @default.
• W3037665080 hasBestOaLocation W30376650801 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3037665080 hasConcept C2777077232 @default.

• next