Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3037983066> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W3037983066 endingPage "103262" @default.
- W3037983066 startingPage "103262" @default.
- W3037983066 abstract "Abstract Several studies have highlighted the persistent lack of impact that African researchers have in international science. To examine this in the geosciences, we reviewed the representation and contribution of African authors using a bibliometric study of international high-impact geoscience journals. Detailed metadata from all articles (n = 182,996) published in these journals (n = 21), and from two Africa-based journals, were extracted from the Web of Science™. We then assembled information related to the research to track how frequently African authors and studies appear, relative to their international peers. The results show that, on average, 3573 high-impact geoscience articles are published each year, and 3.9% of these articles are on an African topic. Only 30% of these African articles contain an African author. In terms of authorship, the continent of Africa has produced 2.3% of the geoscience literature surveyed, which is comparable to the Netherlands (2.2%), a country 70 times smaller than Africa by population. Geoscience output from Africa over time shows concerning trends, in that it persistently lags behind global output, especially in comparison with high-income countries. For example, the five years of most prolific output from Africa occurred more than 25 years ago (1978, 1979, 1982, 1983, 1990). In terms of academic impact, the 25 most highly cited geoscience articles for each of the journals surveyed were found to be written by 2744 authors, of which only 13 are African. There is also an intra-Africa imbalance in authorship, given that more than 80% of African authorships stem from only five countries (South Africa, Egypt, Morocco, Ethiopia, Algeria, and Cameroon). Lastly, we show that most countries produce 60–80% of their own geoscience articles (i.e., by in-country authors), while this number for Africa is 30%. This is clear evidence of ‘parachute’ geoscience in Africa, a practise that marginalises the prospects of in-country researchers. Such practises may have also developed because the next generation of researchers in Africa is not developing, a problem caused by the lowest tertiary education enrolment rate in the world, and the well-documented ‘brain-drain’ of scientists from the continent. There is also a strong parallelism between research expenditure per capita and research output globally: high-income countries, which produce most of the geoscience research, spent US$1064 per capita on research in 2017, while Africa spent only US$42. Such low expenditure results not only from difficulties in raising research funds, but also from weak institutional support for African researchers, except in South Africa. For those researchers who are productive, they are reluctant to submit work to high-impact journals, for fear of rejection, and many do not become involved in international collaborations because of high teaching loads and lack of incentive. Indeed, there is even a distinct lack of intra-Africa collaboration—only 6 countries collaborate internally, mostly with South Africa. However, there are positive international collaborations being developed in the earth and environmental sciences in Africa, such as the UNESCO-supported online training program (GEOLOOC), the West African Exploration Initiative, the Africa Array program, and other programs initiated by the British Geological Survey in East Africa." @default.
- W3037983066 created "2020-07-02" @default.
- W3037983066 creator A5045092096 @default.
- W3037983066 creator A5055327907 @default.
- W3037983066 creator A5071367991 @default.
- W3037983066 date "2020-09-01" @default.
- W3037983066 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
- W3037983066 title "Out of Africa: The underrepresentation of African authors in high-impact geoscience literature" @default.
- W3037983066 cites W1973532288 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W1979109468 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W1980642331 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2006990074 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2055458526 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2063560178 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2079377779 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2085520986 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2119361765 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2128438887 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2159534748 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2190487559 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2264728004 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2405054891 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2555315083 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2607441733 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2760604601 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2780049920 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2788843768 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2913596828 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2919176114 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2922015415 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2940171904 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W2951345899 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W331197271 @default.
- W3037983066 cites W4251462416 @default.
- W3037983066 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103262" @default.
- W3037983066 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3037983066 type Work @default.
- W3037983066 sameAs 3037983066 @default.
- W3037983066 citedByCount "56" @default.
- W3037983066 countsByYear W30379830662020 @default.
- W3037983066 countsByYear W30379830662021 @default.
- W3037983066 countsByYear W30379830662022 @default.
- W3037983066 countsByYear W30379830662023 @default.
- W3037983066 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3037983066 hasAuthorship W3037983066A5045092096 @default.
- W3037983066 hasAuthorship W3037983066A5055327907 @default.
- W3037983066 hasAuthorship W3037983066A5071367991 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConcept C17409809 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConcept C1965285 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConceptScore W3037983066C127313418 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConceptScore W3037983066C17409809 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConceptScore W3037983066C17744445 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConceptScore W3037983066C1965285 @default.
- W3037983066 hasConceptScore W3037983066C205649164 @default.
- W3037983066 hasFunder F4320322812 @default.
- W3037983066 hasLocation W30379830661 @default.
- W3037983066 hasOpenAccess W3037983066 @default.
- W3037983066 hasPrimaryLocation W30379830661 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W1758497512 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W1986055120 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W2040829098 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W2106604767 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W2361911732 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W2380934447 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W2569551886 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3037983066 hasRelatedWork W4200078603 @default.
- W3037983066 hasVolume "208" @default.
- W3037983066 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3037983066 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3037983066 magId "3037983066" @default.
- W3037983066 workType "article" @default.