FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3038791334> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3038791334 endingPage "217" @default.
• W3038791334 startingPage "205" @default.
• W3038791334 abstract "To develop an evidence base to guide clinicians treating adults with large proximal ureteral stones (LPUS) greater than 10 mm. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning different LPUS management techniques including laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) up until March 2020. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement when searching and determining inclusion. All included articles were quality assessed and the data analyses were conducted with Review Manager (5.3). 12 RCTs involving 1416 patients met our eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Of these participants, 44.6% (n = 632) underwent URL, 25.5% (n = 361) PCNL, and 29.9% (n = 423) LU. Pooled analysis revealed that URL had a significantly lower stone-free rate (SFR) compared to PCNL and LU (both with p < 0.05). URL had a significantly higher ureteral injury rate compared to LU (Relative risk (RR) = 5.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52 to 18.22, p = 0.009) and PCNL (RR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 16.34, p = 0.04). However, no significant differences were found between PCNL and LU in terms of SFR or overall complications, both with p > 0.05. URL initially costs less than PCNL (Weighted mean difference (WMD) −597.35US$, 95% CI -823.10 to −371.60, p < 0.00001), but being less effective creates greater demand for repeat or ancillary treatments compared to LU (RR 15.65, 95% CI 2.11–116.12, p = 0.007) and PCNL (RR 8.86; 95% CI 3.19–24.60; p < 0.00001). Both PCNL and LU appear more effective and safer than URL for LPUS; although, LU has higher risk of urine leakage and is more likely incur trauma which requires additional support. However, caution must be taken because this recommendation is based upon a very limited number of clinical studies, and even fewer comparing flexible ureteroscopic technologies. Further prospective real-world studies or RCTs comparing flexible URL, LU and PCNL are required, as well as an in depth analysis of the hidden costs involved in unsuccessful URL treatments. • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) are superior to ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL). • LU has higher risk of urine leakage. • LU can cause more trauma than PCNL." @default.
• W3038791334 created "2020-07-10" @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5005813144 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5007780632 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5014930577 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5043120457 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5058590640 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5061082958 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5062755510 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5083694907 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5085522111 @default.
• W3038791334 creator A5088064336 @default.
• W3038791334 date "2020-08-01" @default.
• W3038791334 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W3038791334 title "Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials" @default.
• W3038791334 cites W1236439116 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W1620380385 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W1918509856 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W1951953522 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W1983213924 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W1988110589 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2003180498 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2018115130 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2027245130 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2032737829 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2033064480 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2035939822 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2047189144 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2086676336 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2095471272 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2125772776 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2149476294 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2150771336 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2162732991 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W217866944 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2258966579 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2315802787 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2468996569 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2514844209 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2550048869 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2623937697 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2726504275 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2747393027 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2808187621 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2900647439 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W2967810495 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W3032643595 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W4241496585 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W4249589912 @default.
• W3038791334 cites W55969528 @default.
• W3038791334 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025" @default.
• W3038791334 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32622059" @default.
• W3038791334 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3038791334 type Work @default.
• W3038791334 sameAs 3038791334 @default.
• W3038791334 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W3038791334 countsByYear W30387913342020 @default.
• W3038791334 countsByYear W30387913342021 @default.
• W3038791334 countsByYear W30387913342022 @default.
• W3038791334 countsByYear W30387913342023 @default.
• W3038791334 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5005813144 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5007780632 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5014930577 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5043120457 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5058590640 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5061082958 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5062755510 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5083694907 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5085522111 @default.
• W3038791334 hasAuthorship W3038791334A5088064336 @default.
• W3038791334 hasBestOaLocation W30387913341 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConceptScore W3038791334C126322002 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConceptScore W3038791334C126894567 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConceptScore W3038791334C141071460 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConceptScore W3038791334C168563851 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConceptScore W3038791334C71924100 @default.
• W3038791334 hasConceptScore W3038791334C95190672 @default.
• W3038791334 hasLocation W30387913341 @default.
• W3038791334 hasOpenAccess W3038791334 @default.
• W3038791334 hasPrimaryLocation W30387913341 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W3038791334 hasRelatedWork W2903040050 @default.
• W3038791334 hasVolume "80" @default.

• next